期刊文献+

基于经理人过度投资行为的控制权配置机制设计 被引量:1

On the Mechanism Design of the Control Rights Allocation under Managers' Over-Investment Behaviors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过建立一个基本分析框架,研究了经理人过度投资行为与控制权配置机制设计之间的关系,研究结果表明,设计适当的控制权配置机制能够有效缓解经理人的过度投资行为,且控制权的配置存在着某些规律性,并由此得到了一些重要结论:当市场机制较为完善或股东的监督效力比较强时,或当投资项目的风险较大而使监督经营行为的成本很大时,经理人应配置更大的控制权;当经理人获取隐性收益的能力和可能性较大时,经理人应配置较小的控制权;配置给经理人的最优控制权及其最优分成比例在激励功能上是互补的,为降低经理人的过度投资而设计的激励机制就是在两者之间进行权衡。文章最后还对缓解我国公司经理人的过度投资行为提出了建议。 This paper studied the relationship between managers' over-investment behaviors and the mech- anism design of the control rights allocation by developing a basic analysis frame. The results indicate that de- signing the proper mechanism of the control rights allocation can restrain managers' over-investment behaviors and the control rights allocation has certain regularities. We thus conclude that managers should allocate more control rights as the market mechanism is more perfect or shareholders' monitor is quite strong, or as the moni- toring cost to the management caused by investment risks is tremendous; that managers should allocate fewer control rights as managers' ability and possibility to gain the hidden income is big; that the optimal control rights and the optimal sharecropping rate to managers are supplementary in the incentive function, the incentive mechanism to restrain managers' over-investment is the tradeoff between these two aspects.
出处 《当代经济科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期78-84,127,共7页 Modern Economic Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(编号:70772040) 湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目(编号:09YBB148) 湖南科技大学科学研究基金(编号:E58115)
关键词 过度投资 控制权私人收益 控制权配置 激励机制 Key words: Over-investment Private Benefits of Control Rights Control Rights Allocation Incentive Mechanism Over-investment Private Benefits of Control Rights Control Rights Allocation Incentive Mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Bede A, Means C. The modem corporation and private property[M]. Macmillan, New York, NY. 1932.
  • 2Jensen M C, Meckling W H. Theory of firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and capital structure[ J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3 (2) :305 - 360.
  • 3Jensen M C, Ruback R S. The market for corporate con- trol: the scientific evidence [ J ]. Journal of Financial E- conomics, 1983,2:5 - 50.
  • 4Hart O D. The market mechanism as an incentive scheme [J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1983,14:42 -64.
  • 5Jensen M C. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate fi- nance, and takeovers [ J ]. American Economic Review, 1986,76 (3) : 323 - 329.
  • 6Scharfstein D. The disciplinary role of takeover[ J]. Re- view of Economic studies, 1988,55 : 185 - 200.
  • 7Rosen S. Authority, control, and the distribution of earning[J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1982,13 (2) :311 - 324.
  • 8Barro J R. Pay, performance and turnover of bank CEOs [ J]. Journal of Labor Economics, 1990,8 ( 3 ) : 448 - 482.
  • 9Convon M J, Sehwalbach J. Corporate governance, exec- utive pay and performance in Europe [ A ]. Executive Compensation and shareholder value [ C ], Kluwer Aca- demic Publishers, 1999.
  • 10魏刚.高级管理层激励与上市公司经营绩效[J].经济研究,2000,35(3):32-39. 被引量:1645

二级参考文献141

共引文献2466

同被引文献22

引证文献1

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部