期刊文献+

经济危机环境下冗余资源与公司绩效的关系研究——基于行业竞争强度的调节作用 被引量:15

The Relationship between Slack and Organizational Performance under Financial Crisis Based on the Moderator of Industry Competitive Intensity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对于组织冗余资源与公司绩效之间的关系,组织理论和代理理论有着截然相反的观点。组织理论认为冗余资源能够缓冲环境变化的冲击,改善企业绩效;而代理理论认为冗余资源的存在给公司带来代理问题,会损害企业绩效。本文选取2008年沪、深两市A股市场的制造业上市公司为研究样本,检验了在危机环境下不同类型的冗余资源与企业绩效的关系,以及行业竞争程度的调节作用。本文验证了情境因素的重要作用,进一步拓展了相关理论在中国的应用。 Organizational theory and agency theory hold contrary viewpoints on the relationship between points out that slack may bring agency problem to the firm that would destroy organizational performance. With data from China A-share companies in manufacture sector in 2008, this paper examines the relationship be- tween slack resources and organizational performance as well as the moderating effect of industry competitive intensity under the circumstance of crisis. This study thus provides evidence that circumstance is very impor- tant in slack research, and also expands the application of related theory in China.
机构地区 南京大学商学院
出处 《当代经济科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期85-91,127,共7页 Modern Economic Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"基于不同决策模式的应急供应问题建模与协调机制研究"(70872046) 国家自然科学基金项目"突发事件情境下冗余资源与公司绩效的关系研究"(71072038)
关键词 危机环境 冗余资源 公司绩效 行业竞争强度 Circumstance of Crisis Slack Resource Organizational Performance Industry Competitive Intensity
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Cyert R, March J. A behavioral theory of the firm[ M]. New Jersey : Prentice - Hall, 1963.
  • 2Tan J, Peng M. Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: two studies from an e- merging economy [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24 : 1249 - 1264.
  • 3冉敏.论冗余资源与扭转战略选择[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2007,13(6):37-42. 被引量:14
  • 4Bromiley P. Testing a causal model of corporate risk tak- ing and performance [ J ]. Academy of Management Jour- nal, 1991, 34( 1 ) :37 -59.
  • 5Nohria N, Gulati R. Is slack good or bad for innovation [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39 (5) : 1245 - 1264.
  • 6蒋春燕,赵曙明.组织冗余与绩效的关系:中国上市公司的时间序列实证研究[J].管理世界,2004,20(5):108-115. 被引量:138
  • 7邹国庆,倪昌红.经济转型中的组织冗余与企业绩效:制度环境的调节作用[J].中国工业经济,2010(11):120-129. 被引量:74
  • 8Geroge G. Slack resource and the performance of private- ly held firms [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48:661 - 676.
  • 9Ju M, Zhao H. Behind organizational slack and firm performance in China: the moderating roles of owner- ship and competitive intensity[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management Journal, 1996, 39:701 - 717.
  • 10Barnard C. The function of the executive [ M ]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, MA, 1938.

二级参考文献92

  • 1王永贵,邢金刚,李元.战略柔性与竞争绩效:环境动荡性的调节效应[J].管理科学学报,2004,7(6):70-78. 被引量:56
  • 2戴德明,毛新述,邓璠.上市公司战略选择弹性与业绩关系的实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2006,9(4):76-83. 被引量:9
  • 3靳涛.资本倚重、投资竞争与经济增长——中国转型期经济增长的再思索(1978~2004)[J].统计研究,2006,23(9):37-41. 被引量:23
  • 4Bourgeois, III. L. On the Measurement of Organizational Slack[J]. Academy of Management Review,1981,6(1).
  • 5Bromiley, P. Testing a Causal Model of Corporate Risk Taking and Performance [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, (34).
  • 6Cyert, R., and J. March. A Behavioral Theory of The Firm[M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 1963,.
  • 7Jensen, M., and W. Meckling. Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency. Costs and Ownership Structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3(4).
  • 8Ju, M., and H. Zhao. Behind Organizational Slack and Firm Performance in China: The Moderating Roles of Ownership and Competitive Intensity[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2009, 26(4).
  • 9Nohria, N., and R. Gulati. Is Slack Good or Bad for hmovation[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1996,(39).
  • 10North, D.C. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance [M]. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press, 1990.

共引文献194

同被引文献239

引证文献15

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部