摘要
《证据规定》实施后,司法实践中的一些真实案例对偷拍偷录、陷阱取证、悬赏取证等一些特殊取证方式的认可在一定程度上表明法官对发现真实的追求。为追求个案的实体公正和办案的社会效果,法官可以采取利益衡量的方法来决定非法证据的取舍并借助判例来约束法官对非法证据取舍的自由裁量权。
After Evidence Regulation was published, there was acceptance of secretly tape or videotape, trap evidence obtaining and collecting evidence by offering a reward in judicial practice. To achieve substantive justice and social effect of definite cases, judges may use illegal evidence in accordance with interest measurement.
出处
《宁夏社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第5期23-26,共4页
NingXia Social Sciences
关键词
非法证据
发现真实
实体正义
利益衡量
判例
illegal evidence
truth
substantive justice
interest measurement
cases