期刊文献+

小鼠新颖寻求特质对酒精的运动激活效应的影响 被引量:2

The Influence of Novelty Seeking Behavioral Trait on Ethanol Induced Stimulatory Effects in Mice
下载PDF
导出
摘要 新颖寻求(或感觉寻求)特质与许多成瘾药物的易感性密切相关。例如,高、低新颖寻求动物对可卡因、苯丙胺和吗啡等成瘾药物的奖赏、运动激活、强化效应的反应存在差异。长期饮用酒精也容易成瘾,但尚未发现关于新颖寻求特质影响酒精成瘾的报道。本实验采用药物成瘾研究中常用的自发活动模型,考察了高、低新颖寻求动物在酒精急性处理、慢性处理和激发过程中的行为表现。实验过程中首先采用两种新颖寻求模型,即新颖环境中自发活动模型和新颖客体偏爱模型,将昆明小鼠分别区分为高、低自发活动组和高、低新颖客体偏爱组,连续10天给予酒精(2g/kg/d,i.p.)或等量盐水处理,戒断2天后所有小鼠接受酒精(2g/kg)激发。实验结果表明,新颖环境低自发活动小鼠比新颖环境高自发活动小鼠对酒精急性、慢性处理导致的运动激活效应更敏感;在酒精激发期前者的自发活动水平也高于后者。本实验结果说明新颖环境中自发活动特质影响动物对酒精导致的运动激活效应的反应。 Novelty seeking or sensation seeking is often associated with susceptibility to substance abuse.In preclinical studies,high and low novelty seeking animals show different sensitivities to locomotor stimulating,rewarding and reinforcing effects of drugs of abuse,such as cocaine,amphetamine and morphine.It is well known that chronic alcohol consumption can result in alcoholism;however,little is known about the relationship between novelty seeking behavioral trait and propensity to alcoholism.The present study examined the relationship between novelty seeking and the response to acute or repeated ethanol treatment using locomotor activity as the behavioral endpoint.Adult male KM mice were categorized as HR(high responders in novel environment) and LR(low responders in novel environment),or HOP(high object preference) and LOP(low object preference) based on their activities in a novel environment and novel object preference.After baseline activity measurements,subjects were tested daily after i.p.injections of either ethanol(2g/kg/d) or saline for 10 days.Two days later,ethanol(2g/kg) was re-tested in all animals.LR mice were more sensitive than HR mice to acute and chronic ethanol induced hyperactivity.When challenged with ethanol 2 days after repeated ethanol treatment,the locomotor stimulating effect of ethanol was more robust in LR mice than in HR mice.No such difference was observed in HOP mice and LOP mice.In conclusion,locomotor activity in a novel environment may predict the locomotor stimulating effects of ethanol in KM mice.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第9期1038-1044,共7页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(10YJAXLX010)资助
关键词 新颖寻求 感觉寻求 酒精 自发活动 novelty seeking sensation seeking ethanol or alcohol locomotor activity
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Ballaz, S. J. (2009). Differential novelty detection in rats selectively bred for novelty-seeking behavior. Neuroscience Letters, 461(1), 45-48.
  • 2Blancharda, M. M., Mendelsohna, D., & Stamp, J. A. (2009). The HR/LR model: Further evidence as an animal model of sensation seeking. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(7), 1145-1154.
  • 3Boehm, S. L., Goldfarb, K. J., Serio, K. M., Moore, E. M., & Linsenbardt, D. N. (2008). Does context influence the duration of locomotor sensitization to ethanol in female DBA/2J mice? Psychopharmacology, 197(2), 191-201.
  • 4Breese, G. R., Sinha, R., & Heilig, M. (2010). Chronic alcohol neuroadaptation and stress contribute to susceptibility for alcohol craving and relapse. Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 129(2), 149-171.
  • 5Chuck, T. L., McLaughlin, R J., Arizzi-LaFrance, M. N., Salamone, J. D., & Correa, M. (2006). Comparison between multiple behavioral effects of peripheral ethanol administration in rats: Sedation, ataxia, and bradykinesia. Life Sciences, 79(2), 154-161.
  • 6Cloninger, C. R. (1986). A unified biosocial theory of personality and its role in the development of anxiety states. Psychiatric Developments, 4(3), 167-226.
  • 7Cloninger, C. R., Sigvardsson, S., & Gohman, M. (1988). Childhood personality predicts alcohol abuse in young adults. Alcoholism Clinical and Experiment Research, 12(4), 494-505.
  • 8Davis, B. A., Clinton, S. M., Akila, H., & Becker, J. B. (2008). The effects of novelty-seeking phenotypes and sex differences on acquisition of cocaine self-administration in selectively bred High-Responder and Low-Responder rats. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 90(3), 331-338.
  • 9Didone, V., Quoilin, C., Tirelli, E., & Quertemont, E. (2008). Parametric analysis of the development and expression of ethanol-induced behavioral sensitization in female Swiss mice: Effects of dose, injection schedule, and test context. Psychopharmacology, 201(2), 249-260.
  • 10Hooks, M. S., Jones, G. H., Neill, D. B., & Justice, J. B., Jr. (1992). Individual differences in amphetamine sensitization: Dose-dependent effects. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 41(1), 203-210.

二级参考文献27

  • 1Stewart J, Badiani A. Tolerance and sensitization to the behavioral effects of drugs. Behav Pharmacol. 1993. 4(4) : 289 -312.
  • 2Robinson T E, Becker J B. Enduring changes in brain and behavior produced by chronic amphetamine administration; a review and evaluation of animal models of amphetamine psychosis. Brain Res,1986, 396(2) : 157 -198.
  • 3Robinson T E, Berridge K C. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive- sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Brain Res Rev, 1993, 18(3) : 247-291.
  • 4Anagnostaras S G, Schallert T, Robinson T E. Memory processes governing amphetamine induced psychomotor sensitization.Neuropsychopharmacology, 2002, 26 (6): 703-715.
  • 5Anagnostaras S G, Robinson T E. Sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine: modulation by associative learning. Behav Neurosci, 1996, 110(6): 1397-1414.
  • 6Hoshaw B A, Lewis M J. Behavioral sensitization to ethanol in rats :evidence from the Sprague - Dawley strain. Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 2001, 68(4) : 685-690.
  • 7Matt[ngly B A, et al. Cocaine - induced behavioral sens t zation:effects of haloperidol and SCH 23390 treatments. Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 1996, 53(3) : 481-486.
  • 8Phillips T J, Roberts A J, Lessov C N. Behavioral sensitization to ethanol: genetics and the effects of stress. Pharmacol BiochemBehav, 1997, 57(3) : 487-493.
  • 9PoweU K R, Hohzman S G. Parametric evaluation of the development of sensitization to the effects of morphine on locomotor activity. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2001. 62( 1 ) : 83-90.
  • 10Vanderschuren L J, et al. A single exposure to morphine induces long- lasting behavioural and neurochemical sensitization in rats.Eur J Neuroscl, 2001, 14(9) : 1533-1538.

共引文献4

同被引文献67

  • 1郑希耕,李勇辉,罗小景,肖琳,杨小燕,隋南.吗啡行为及条件性行为敏感化效应及其个体差异[J].心理学报,2005,37(3):351-356. 被引量:5
  • 2石庆馨,周荣刚,葛燕,秦宪刚,张侃.中学生网络成瘾和感觉寻求的关系[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2005,19(7):453-456. 被引量:37
  • 3Ballaz, S. J. (2009). Differential novelty detection in ratsselectively bred for novelty-seeking behavior.Neuroscience Letters, 461(1): 45-48.
  • 4Ballaz, S. J., Akil, H., & Watson, S. J. (2007a). Analysis of5-HT6 and 5-HT7 receptor gene expression in rats showingdifferences in novelty-seeking behavior. Neuroscience^ 147{2),428一《8.
  • 5Ballaz, S. J., Akil, H.’ & Watson, S. J. (2007b). The 5-HT7receptor: Role in novel object discrimination and relationto novelty-seeking behavior. Neuroscience,192-202.
  • 6Ballaz, S. J., Akil, H.,& Watson, S. J. (2008). The CCK-systemunderpins novelty-seeking behavior in the rat: Geneexpression and pharmacological analyses. Neuropeptides,42(3), 245-253.
  • 7Bardo, M. T.,Bowling, S. L., Robinet, P. M., Rowlett, J. K.,Lacy, M., & Mattingly, B. A. (1993). Role of dopamine D|and D2 receptors in novelty-maintained place preference.Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 7(1-4),101-109.
  • 8Bardo, M. T., Donohew, R. L.,& Harrington, N. G. (1996).Psychobiology of novelty seeking and drug seekingbehavior. Behavioural Brain Research, 77(1-2),23-43.
  • 9Beckmann, J. S., Marusich, J. A., Gipson, C. D.,& Bardo, M.T. (2011). Novelty seeking, incentive salience andacquisition of cocaine self-administration in the rat.Behavioural Brain Research, 216(1), 159-165.
  • 10Belin, D., Berson, N.,Balado, E.,Piazza, P. V., &Deroche-Gamonet, V. (2011). High-novelty-preference ratsare predisposed to compulsive cocaine self-administration.Neuropsychopharmacology, 36, 569-579.

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部