期刊文献+

Improved dynamic testing by impedance control

Improved dynamic testing by impedance control
下载PDF
导出
摘要 In this paper, the issue of actuator-structure interaction in dynamic testing of structures is considered. The problem is approached from the novel standpoint of impedance control. It is shown that an effective strategy to design controls for dynamic testing is by designing the test system impedance. It is also shown that this can be achieved using feedforward compensation. The analysis is carried out in the context of displacement controlled dynamic testing, when the tested structure has a high and nonlinear stiffness. It is demonstrated that stable and accurate dynamic testing can be achieved using the proposed strategy, when this is not possible using traditional feedback control techniques. Furthermore, the impedance control and feedforward strategies are applied in the context of hybrid simulation, a technique of coupling computational and physical substructures applied in earthquake engineering. Here, a delay compensation scheme is necessary in addition to feedforward. Experimental results are presented that demonstrate both improved dynamic testing performance when impedance control is employed, and its applicability in hybrid simulation. In this paper, the issue of actuator-structure interaction in dynamic testing of structures is considered. The problem is approached from the novel standpoint of impedance control. It is shown that an effective strategy to design controls for dynamic testing is by designing the test system impedance. It is also shown that this can be achieved using feedforward compensation. The analysis is carried out in the context of displacement controlled dynamic testing, when the tested structure has a high and nonlinear stiffness. It is demonstrated that stable and accurate dynamic testing can be achieved using the proposed strategy, when this is not possible using traditional feedback control techniques. Furthermore, the impedance control and feedforward strategies are applied in the context of hybrid simulation, a technique of coupling computational and physical substructures applied in earthquake engineering. Here, a delay compensation scheme is necessary in addition to feedforward. Experimental results are presented that demonstrate both improved dynamic testing performance when impedance control is employed, and its applicability in hybrid simulation.
机构地区 Department of Civil
出处 《Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration》 SCIE EI CSCD 2011年第3期423-435,共13页 地震工程与工程振动(英文刊)
基金 Dept.of Civil,Structural and Architectural Engineering and the College of Engineering and Applied Sciences of the University of Colorado at Boulder,USA
关键词 dynamic test actuator-structure interaction impedance control hybrid simulation feedforward strategy dynamic test actuator-structure interaction impedance control hybrid simulation feedforward strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Bonnet PA, Williams MS and Blakeborough A (2007), "Compensation of Actuator Dynamics in Real-time Hybrid Tests," Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part 1: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, 221(2): 251-264.
  • 2Combescure D and Pegon P (1997). "a-operator Splitting Time Integration Technique for Pseudodynamic Testing, Error Propagation Analysis," Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 16(7-8): 427.
  • 3Conte JP and Trombetti TL (2000), "Linear Dynamic Modeling of a Uni-axial Servo-hydraulic Shaking Table System," Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 29(9): 1375-1404.
  • 4Dimig J, Shield C, French C, Bailey F and Clark A (1999), "Effective Force Testing: A Method of Seismic Simulation for Structural Testing," ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 125(9): 1028-1037.
  • 5Dyke SJ, Spencer BF, Jr, Quast P and Sain MK (1995),"Role of Control-structure Interaction in Protective System Design," ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 121(2): 322-338.
  • 6Elkhoraibi T and Mosalam KM (2006), dynamic Experiment on One-story RC "Pseudo- Structure with and without Masonry lnfill," 8th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, California.
  • 7Franklin GF, Powell JD and Emami-Naeini A (2002), Feedback control of dynamic systems, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, N.J. London.
  • 8Hilber HM, Hughes TJR and Taylor RL (1977), "Improved Numerical Dissipation for Time Integration Algorithms in Structural Dynamics," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 5(3): 283-292.
  • 9Hogan N (1985), "Impedance Control: an Approach to Manipulation. 1. Theory," Transactions of the ASME. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, 107(1): 1-7.
  • 10Horiuchi T, Inoue M, Konno T and Namita Y (1999), "Real-time Hybrid Experimental System with Actuator Delay Compensation and Its Application to a Piping System with Energy Absorber," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28(10): 1121-1141.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部