期刊文献+

论《涉外民事关系法律适用法》的实质正义取向 被引量:1

On Substantial Justice Orientation of Law of the Application of Law for Foreign-Related Civil Relations of the People's Republic of China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2010年10月28日通过的《涉外民事关系法律适用法》比较明显的一个特点是体现了对法的实质正义价值的追求,这一特点在条文中主要体现为在婚姻家庭和特殊合同领域对弱者合法权益的保护、促进某些法律行为有效成立和促进身份关系确立的其他结果导向规则的大幅采纳以及最密切联系原则地位的提升,体现了国际私法的人本主义取向。而实质正义所外化的诸多富有弹性的法律选择规则在实践中会对法官素质提出更高的要求。 It is important to private international law academia that Law of the Application o J Law, for Foreign-Related Civil Relations of the People's Republic of China be adopted eventually on October 28th, 2010. The obvious feature of the Law is the pursuit of substantial justice, which embodies the following: protecting the rights and interests of the disadvantaged parties in the civil relations of marrige and family and certain kind of special contracts; employing result-oriented rules to establish legal transactions and identity relationship; promoting the status of the doctrine of the most significant relationship. AI though the Law is human-oriented, the substantial justice implied in the flexible choice of law rules chal lenges the moral and professional competences of judges.
作者 张丽珍
出处 《中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2011年第2期45-50,共6页 Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences)
关键词 《适用法》 实质正义 保护弱者合法权益 结果导向规则 最密切联系原则 Law of the Application of Law for Foreign-Related Civil Relations of the PeopleS Republic of China substantial justice the protection of the rights and interests of the disadvantaged parties result-oriented rules the doctrine of the most significant relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1郑成良.法律之内的正义[M].北京:法律出版社,2002.
  • 2[美]约翰X罗尔斯著,何怀宏,何包钢,廖申白译.正义论(修订版)[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2009.
  • 3[美]EX博登海默著,邓正来译.法理学-法律哲学与法律方法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004.
  • 4徐冬根.论国际私法的形式正义与实质正义[J].华东政法学院学报,2006(1):67-72. 被引量:21
  • 5Gerhard Kegel, Paternal Home and Dream Home: Traditional Conflict of Laws and the American Reformers, 27 Am. J. Comp. L. 615, 616 (1979).
  • 6[美]西蒙尼德斯著 宋晓译.20世纪末的国际私法-进步抑或退步.民商法论丛,2002,(24):396-396.
  • 7Brainerd Currie, Selected Essays on the Conflict of Laws, 180, 183(1963).
  • 8Robert A. Leflar, Choice Influencing Consideration in Conflicts Law, 41 N. Y. U. L. Rev. 267.
  • 9Conflicts Law More on Choice Influencing Considerations, 54 Cal. L. Rev. 1584.
  • 10Symeon C. Symeonides, Result-selectvism in Conflicts Law, 46 Willamette L. Rev. 1. 3 (2009).

二级参考文献34

共引文献165

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部