期刊文献+

非英语专业大学生英语作文衔接手段习得模式研究 被引量:1

A Study on Acquisition Pattern of English Cohesive Devices for Non-English Majors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我们利用Halliday&Hasan的语篇衔接理论,连续跟踪调查了非英语专业大学生两年来英语作文衔接手段的习得模式。主要回答了两个问题:(1)在大学英语学习的不同阶段,学生使用衔接手段的总体情况如何?(2)随着英语水平的不断提高,学生对衔接手段的使用有无变化?若有变化,变化的模式是什么?通过统计分析,我们发现非英语专业大学生在英语写作时使用了各类衔接手段,但各类衔接手段的使用频率并不相同,指代、连接和词汇衔接使用频率较高,替代与省略使用较少;本研究还发现各种衔接手段的使用频率呈现不同的习得模式。指代的使用频率呈递减,词汇衔接呈递增,而连接、替代与省略没有形成明显的变化趋势。 In the present study, based on Halliday & Hasan's cohesive theory, acquisition pattern of English cohesive devices employed in sample compositions written by Chinese non-English majors is inves tigated successively to explore the following two questions: (1) How do the Chinese non-English majors use English cohesive devices in different learning stages? (2) Are there any changes in using cohesive de vices with the improvement of their English proficiency levels? If there are any, what is the pattern of the changes? By analyzing the related data, we find that non-English majors use all kinds of cohesive devices in their English compositions, but the frequency distributions of various cohesive devices are different. Refer ence, conjunction and lexical cohesion are used frequently in the sample compositions, but substitution and ellipsis are employed less, especially ellipsis. In addition, we also find that the frequency distributions of various cohesive devices present different developmental patterns across the four terms. The frequency of reference displays a decreasing developmental pattern while the frequency of lexical cohesion exhibits an in creasing one, yet the frequencies in using conjunction, substitution and ellipsis do not form a stable tendency.
出处 《中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2011年第2期73-78,共6页 Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences)
关键词 英语作文 衔接手段 习得模式 频率分布 English compositions cohesive devices acquisition pattern frequency distribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Halliday, M. A. K. & R. Hasan. Cohesion in English [M]. geijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2006.
  • 2Crowhurst, M. Cohesion in argument and narration at three grade levels[J]. Research in the Teaching of English , 1987, ( 21):185- 201.
  • 3Spiegel, D. & F. Fitzgerald. Textual cohesion and coherence in children's writing revised[J].Research in the Teaching of English, 1990, (24): 49-66.
  • 4Cox, B. E. , T. Shanahan & M. Tinzmann. Children's knowledge of organization, cohesion and voice in written exposition [J]. Research in the Teaching of English , 1991, (25):179-218.
  • 5潘璠,冯跃进.非英语专业研究生写作中连接词用法的语料库调查[J].现代外语,2004,27(2):157-162. 被引量:108
  • 6徐玉臣.英语作文衔接模式与衔接错误的对比分析[J].国外外语教学,2003(3):54-60. 被引量:10
  • 7Norment, N. J. Contrastive analysis of cohesive devices in Chinese and Chinese ESL in narrative and expository written texts[J].Chinese I.anguage Teaching Association Journal, 1994, (29): 1,49-81.
  • 8Halliday, M. A. K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. Beijing; Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2000.
  • 9McCarthy, M. Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press. , 2002.
  • 10Hinkel, E. Second Language Writer's Text : Linguistic and Rhetorical Features [M]. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaurn Associates., 2002.

二级参考文献27

共引文献247

同被引文献32

  • 1董俊虹.大学生英语写作中语篇衔接与连贯的错误分析[J].外语教学,1999,20(1):84-87. 被引量:48
  • 2王初明,牛瑞英,郑小湘.以写促学——一项英语写作教学改革的试验[J].外语教学与研究,2000,32(3):207-212. 被引量:958
  • 3梁茂成.学习者书面语语篇连贯性的研究[J].现代外语,2006,29(3):284-292. 被引量:92
  • 4De Guerrero M C M & Villamil O S. Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision [ J ]. The Modern Language Journal, 2000, 84( 1 ) : 51-68.
  • 5Gray P & Feldman J. Playing in the zone of proximal development: Qualities of self-directed age mixing be- tween adolescents and young children at a democratic school [ J ]. American Journal of Education, 2004, 110(2) : 108-145.
  • 6Hawe E M & Dixon H R. Building students' evaluative and productive expertise in the writing classroom [ J ]. Assessing Writing, 2014, (19): 66-79.
  • 7Jacobs G Met al. Feedback on student writing: Taking the middle path [ J ]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1998, 7(3): 307-317.
  • 8Leki I. Potential problems with peer responding in ESL writing classes [ J ]. CATESOL Journal, 1990, ( 3 ) : 5 -19.
  • 9Lundstrom K & Baker W. To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2009, 18( 1 ) : 30-43.
  • 10Murphy S. A sociocuhural perspective on teacher response: Is there a student in the room? [ J ]. Assessing Writing, 2000, 7( 1 ): 79-90.

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部