期刊文献+

批评话语分析中的词汇语法 被引量:4

Lexicogrammar in Critical Discourse Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 批评话语分析理论主要以语言学理论作为工具来研究社会、意识形态和权力问题,而语言学研究的重点是语言本身的特点,所以需要对批评语言学的理论框架进行改进,在语篇分析程序中增加一个反向研究步骤,从社会文化和意识形态因素如何在语言中体现出发,解析词汇语法特征和某些特殊语篇特征在体现语篇的社会文化和意识形态方面的基本规律,发现了通过在概念意义上以一定的语法模式对整体内容进行取舍,在人际意义上以一定词汇模式表现明确的和隐含的态度意义来实现意识形态的特点,对语言学理论建设做出贡献。 The theory of critical discourse analysis (CDA) mainly studies society, ideology and power by taking linguistic theory as an instrument, but the focus of linguistic study should be on the essential features of language itself. Therefore, we need to refine the CDA theoretical framework by adding a reversed procedure of analysis. From the perspective of how social-cultural and ideological factors are real ized by language, it investigates the basic principles of how the lexico-grammatical and special discoursal features realize the social-cultural and ideological factors, and finds that the ideology of the text is mainly realized by leaving aside certain content with some particular grammatical patterns in terms of ideational meaning, and expressing certain explicit and implicit attitudinal meaning with certain lexical patterns in terms of interpersonal meaning. As a result, it makes contributions to the theoretical construction of linguistics.
出处 《中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2011年第2期101-106,共6页 Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences)
关键词 批评话语分析 系统功能语言学 词汇语法 critical discourse analysis systemic functional linguistics lexicogrammar
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1丁建新,廖益清.批评话语分析述评[J].当代语言学,2001,3(4):305-310. 被引量:148
  • 2Halliday, M. A. K, Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning[M]. London: Edward Arnold. 1978.
  • 3廖益清.批评话语分析综述[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2000,3(1):76-82. 被引量:17
  • 4Fairclough, N. Critical Discourse Analysis---the critical study of language[J]. Journal of Pragmatics. 1995, (26):299 -310.
  • 5Wodak, R & M. Meyer. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis [M]. London: Sage publishers,2001.
  • 6Van Dijk, T. Multidisciplinary CDA: a plea for diversity[A]. in Wodak, R & M. Meyer. (eds) 2001, Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis[C]. London:Sage publishers. 2001.95-120.
  • 7Fairclough, N. Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research[A], in Wodak, R & M. Meyer. (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis[C]. I,ondon: Sage publish ers. 2001. P121- 138.
  • 8Halliday, M. A.K. "Dimensions of discourse analysis: grammar [A]." In van Dijk, T. A. (ed.)Handbook of Discourse Analy sis. Vol. 2. Dimensions of Diseourse[C]. New York:Academic Press, 1985.

二级参考文献20

  • 1辛斌.新闻语篇转述引语的批评性分析[J].外语教学与研究,1998,30(2):11-16. 被引量:128
  • 2辛斌.语言、权力与意识形态:批评语言学[J].现代外语,1996,19(1):21-26. 被引量:232
  • 3Birch, D., ed. 1985. Style, Structure and Criticism. New Delhi: Bahri Publications Private Limited.
  • 4Birch, D., ed.1989. Language, Literature and Critical Practice: Ways of Analysing Text. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • 5Clark, R., and Ivanic, R. 1997. The Politics of Writing. London: Routledge.
  • 6Dijk, van. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Study. London: Sage.
  • 7Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power. London: Routledge.
  • 8Fairclough, N. 1992a. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • 9Fairclough, N. ed. 1992b. Critical Language Awareness. NewYork: Longman Publishing.
  • 10Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language . NewYork: Longman Publishing.

共引文献161

同被引文献61

引证文献4

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部