期刊文献+

中高剂量文拉法辛对治疗不敏感性躯体形式障碍的疗效比较

Efficacy of middle dose and high dose of venlafaxine in the treatment of treatment non-response somatoform disorders
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨中高剂量文拉法辛对治疗不敏感性躯体形式障碍的疗效。方法:将66例治疗不敏感性躯体形式障碍患者随机分成文拉法辛中剂量组及文拉法辛高剂量组,于治疗前、治疗后12、、4、6周末采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、SCL-90的躯体化因子评定疗效,用不良反应量表(TESS)在治疗后12、、4、6周末评定不良反应。结果:中高剂量两组间疗效无显著差异(x2=0.90,P>0.05)。入组时两组间SCL90躯体化因子、HAMD、HAMA评分差异无显著意义,高剂量组在2、46、周末有下降,而中剂量组在46、周末才下降2,周末3个指标的评分两组间存在差异4,周末与6周末两组的评分无差异,提示高剂量组起效快于中剂量组,但两组6周末的疗效大致相当。TESS评分两组无明显差异。结论:中高剂量文拉法辛对治疗不敏感性躯体形式障碍的疗效及不良反应相当,但高剂量组起效快。 Objective:To explore the efficacy of middle dose and high dose of venlafaxine in the treatment of treatment non - response somatoform disorders. Methods :66 patients with the diagnosis of treatment non -response somatoform disorders were randomly divided into middle dose of venlafaxine group and high dose of venlafaxine group. The efficacy was evaluated by HAMD, HAMA and the Somatlzatlon factor of SCL -90 at pre -treatment and 1,2, 4, 6 weekend after treatment. The side effects were assessed by TESS at 1, 2, 4, 6 weekend after treatment. Results: There was no significant difference in the efficacy between middle dose of venlafaxine group and high dose of venlafaxine group ( x^2 = 0. 90, P 〉 0.05 ). There were no significant differences in HAMD, HAMA and the Somatization factor of SCL - 90 at pre - treatment and 1,4, 6 weekend after treatment between the two groups. However the difference in HAMD, HAMA and the Somatization factor of SCL - 90 was significant at 2 weekend after treatment between the two groups, There was no difference in TESS between the two groups. Conclusions : Middle dose and high dose of venlafaxine had similar efficacy and TESS in treatment of treatment non - response somatoform disorders. But high dose of venlafaxine group had instant effect.
出处 《中国民康医学》 2011年第17期2114-2116,共3页 Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词 文拉法辛 治疗不敏感性躯体形式障碍 奥氮平 Venlafaxine Treatment non - response somatoform disorders Olanzapine
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1徐俊冕.躯体化与躯体形式障碍[J].中国行为医学科学,2004,13(3):359-360. 被引量:63
  • 2Thase ME, Rush AL. The Fourth Generation of Progress [ M ]. New York: Raven Press, 1995:1081 - 1097.
  • 3Harvey AT, Rudolph RL, Preskorn SH. Evidence of the dual mechanisms of action of venlafaxine [ J ]. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2000, 57 (5) : 503 - 509.
  • 4中华医学会精神科分会.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001.75-90.
  • 5汪向东 王希林 骊弘.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.220-223.
  • 6NIMH.副反应量表[M]//张明圆.精神科评定量表手册.长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1998:197-202.
  • 7司天梅,舒良,吉中孚,李惠春,陶明,唐永怡,李晓光,季建林,史以玉,王崇顺,梅其一,欧红霞,翁正,王铭,端义扬,秦晓霞,金雪光.文拉法辛缓释剂治疗抑郁症的开放性研究[J].中华精神科杂志,2006,39(2):85-89. 被引量:38
  • 8Thase ME. What role do atypical antipsychotic drags have in treatment resistant depression[ J]. J Clin Psychiatry, 2002, 63 (2) :95 - 103.

二级参考文献22

  • 1颜文伟(译).精神障碍诊断统计手册(第4版)[J].上海精神医学,1994,6:21-21.
  • 2卫生部疾病控制司 中国疾病预防控制中心精神卫生中心 中华医学会精神病学分会.中国抑郁障碍防治指南[M].北京:北京大学精神卫生研究所,2003.27-54.
  • 3Lipowski ZJ. Somatization: the concept and its clinical application. Am J Psychiatry,1988,145(11):1358-1368.
  • 4世界卫生组织ICD-10. 精神与行为障碍分类. 临床描述与诊断要点.范肖冬,汪向东等译.北京: 人民卫生出版社, 1993.129-135.
  • 5中华医学会精神科分会. CCMD-3. 中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准. 济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001.108-113.
  • 6Cassem NH: Functional Somatic Symptoms and somatoform disorders. in. Hackett TP. & Cassem NH (eds): Handbook of general Hospital psychiatry.PSG. Massachusetts 1987.126-153.
  • 7Ford CV. Somatoform and factitious disorder. In . Gabbard GO.(ed) Treatments of psychiatric disorders, 3rd ed ,2001.1731-1824.
  • 8Phillips KA. Somatoform and factitious disorder. American Psychiatric Publishing,Inc. 2001.1-88.
  • 9Hawton K , Salkovskis PM, Kirk J,et al. eds. Cognitive behaviour therapy for psychiatric problems. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press,1989.235-276.
  • 10Van Londen L, Molenaar RP, Goekoop JG, et al. Three- to 5-year prospective follow-up of outcome in major depression. Psychol Med,1998, 28:731-735.

共引文献2301

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部