期刊文献+

Bryan人工颈椎间盘置换治疗颈椎病的中期临床随访 被引量:12

Clinical outcome of Bryan artificial cervical disc replacement for the treatment of cervical spondylosis:A midterm follow-up
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:Bryan人工颈椎间盘置换的短期疗效优良已被大多数学者公认,但有关其中长期临床效果及并发症的资料较少。目的:总结Bryan人工颈椎间盘置换治疗颈椎病的中期临床效果。方法:选择2004-11/2007-12在四川大学华西医院骨科接受Bryan人工颈椎间盘置换的颈椎间盘突出症患者34例,其中单节段置换30例,双节段置换4例。于置换前、置换后7d、3,6,12,24,36,48个月行SF-36生活质量量表评分、JOA评分、颈部及上肢疼痛目测类比评分;以颈椎正侧位及功能位X射线片测量手术节段、邻近节段及C2~7屈伸活动度的变化,手术节段和邻近节段椎间高度变化及手术节段的轴向平移情况。结果与结论:所有患者置换后神经症状均明显好转,各随访点SF-36生活质量量表躯体评分和心理评分、JOA评分、颈部和上肢疼痛目测类比评分较置换前明显改善(P<0.05),3个月之后各随访时点两两比较差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。置入的Bryan假体历次随访均保留了>2°的活动度,未发现手术节段异位骨化与自发性融合,随访48个月时手术节段及C2~7屈伸活动度较置换前略有增加,但差异无显著性意义(P>0.05);上下邻近节段屈伸活动度维持了置换前水平;手术节段的椎间高度由置换前的(6.04±1.02)mm增加到(8.44±0.43)mm(P<0.05);上下邻近节段椎间高度及手术节段的轴向平移均维持了置换前水平。说明Bryan人工颈椎间盘治疗颈椎间盘退变性疾病的中期临床效果良好,较好的保留了手术节段、邻近节段及整个颈椎的运动学特性,且近中期并发症很少。 BACKGROUND:Although the short-term clinical efficacy of Bryan artificial cervical disc replacement is generally acknowledged by most spinal surgeons,the midterm and long term clinical results and complications are still unclear.OBJECTIVE:To summarize midterm term clinical results of Bryan artificial cervical disc replacement for the treatment of cervical spondylosis.METHOD:From November 2004 to December 2007,34 patients had Bryan cervical disc replacement in Department of Orthopedics,West China Hospital were selected,including 30 cases with single replacement and 4 cases with bi-level replacement.Clinical result was evaluated by SF-36 score,JOA score,and neck/arm pain VAS scores.And the data was collected before surgery and at 7 days,3,6,12,24,36 and 48 months after surgery.Neutral lateral and dynamic cervical radiographs were made to measure the flexion-extension range of motion(ROM) of operative segment,adjacent segments and C2-7 segment,the intervertebral height of operative and adjacent segments,and the translation of operative level.The intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:The neurological symptoms of each patient were alleviated notably.The postoperative SF-36 physical component score and SF-36 mental component score,JOA score,NDI score and neck/arm pain VAS scores were significantly improved compared with those of the preoperative(P 0.05),but no statistical significance were noted between each time point after 3-month follow-up(P 0.05).Each implanted prosthesis preserved the ROM2 at each follow-up time point,and no heterotopic ossification or spontaneous fusion was found at the operative segment.At 48-month follow-up,flexion-extension ROM of operative segment and C2-7 segment slightly increased but showed no statistical significance compared with the preoperative counterparts(P 0.05);ROM of upper and lower adjacent segments also showed no statistical significance compared with the preoperative data(P 0.05).Intervertebral height of operative segment was(6.041.02) mm before the operation and significantly increased to(8.440.43) mm at 48-month follow-up(P 0.05).Intervertebral height of adjacent segments,and the translation of operative level were not significantly changed(P 0.05).The clinical result of Bryan artificial cervical disc replacement is good and kinematic characteristics of operative segment,adjacent segments and C2-7 segment can be maintained in midterm follow-up.The operation is safe and there are few early midterm complications.
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第17期3047-3052,共6页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Robinson R,Smith G.Anterolateral cervical disc removal and interbody fusion for cervical disc syndrome.Bull John Hopkins Hosp.1955;96:223-224.
  • 2Cloward RB.The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks.J Neurosurg 1958;15:602-617.
  • 3Bohlman HH,Emery SE,Goodfellow DB,et al.Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy.Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients.J Bone Joint Surg Am.1993;75:1298-1307.
  • 4Emery SE,Bolestra MJ,Banks MA,et al.Robinson anterior cervical fusion:comparison of the standard and modified techniques.Spine 1994;19:660-663.
  • 5Kaiser MG,Haid RW Jr,Subach BR,et al.Anterior cervical plating enhances arthrodesis after discectomy and fusion with cortical allograft.Neurosurgery 2002;50(2):229-236.
  • 6Wang JC,McDonough PW,Endow KK,et al.Increased fusion rates with cervical plating for two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.Spine(Phila Pa 1976).2000;25(1):41-45.
  • 7Rihn JA,Lawrence J,Gates C,et al.Adjacent segment disease after cervical spine fusion.Instr Course Lect.2009;58:747-756.
  • 8Goffin J,Geusens E,Vantomme N,et al.Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine.J Spinal Disord Tech.2004; 17:79-85.
  • 9Brown CA,Eismont FJ.Complications in spinal fusion.Orthop Clin North Am.1998;29:679-699.
  • 10Silber JS,Anderson DG,Daffner SD,et al.Donor site morbidity after anterior iliac crest bone harvest for single-level anterior cervieal discectomy and fusion.Spine(Phila Pa 1976).2003;28:134-139.

二级参考文献27

  • 1任先军,王卫东,王敏,郝勇,张文捷,王建,初同伟,张年春.人工颈椎间盘置换治疗颈椎间盘突出症[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(23):1766-1768. 被引量:6
  • 2Baba H, Furusawa N, Imura S,et al. Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy[ J]. Spine, 1993,18:2167 -2173.
  • 3Gore DR, Sepie SB. Anterior diseeetomy and fusion for painful cervical disc disease : a report of 50 patients with an average follow - up of 21 years [ J ]. Spine, 1998, 23:2047 - 2051.
  • 4Kulkarni V, rajshekhar V, Raghuram L. Accelerated spondylotic changes adjacent to the fused segment following central cervical cor-peetomy: magnetic resonance imaging study evidence [ J]. J Neurosurg, 2004,100:2-6.
  • 5Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, et al. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1999, 81:519 - 528.
  • 6Pracyk JB, Traynelis VC. Treatment of the painful motion segment [J]. Spine, 2005,30:23-32.
  • 7Goffin J, Casey A, Kehr P,et al. Preliminary clonical experience with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis[J].Nenrosurgery, 2002, 51:840- 847.
  • 8Bryan Jr VE, et al. Cervical motion segment replacement [ J ]. Eur Spine J, 2002,11:92 -97.
  • 9Parkinson JF, Sekhon LH. Cervical arthroplasty complicated by delayed spontaneous fusion. Case report [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2005, 2:377 - 380.
  • 10Bartels R, Donk R. Fusion around cervical disc prosthesis:case report [ J]. Neurosurgery, 2005,57 : 194.

共引文献47

同被引文献133

  • 1何智勇,李开南,聂海,母建松,兰海.Discover人工颈椎间盘置换治疗颈椎间盘退变性疾病的临床疗效[J].四川医学,2012,33(11):1930-1932. 被引量:3
  • 2梁秋发,原林,王文军,曹盛俊,刘利乐,朱一平,王麓山,姚女兆,全必春.人工颈椎间盘置换术后颈椎活动与稳定性的评价[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2005,23(6):664-667. 被引量:6
  • 3胥少汀,葛宝斗,徐印坎.实用骨科学[M].北京:人民军医出版社.2007:436.
  • 4Heller JG,Sasso RC,Papadopoulos SM,et a1.Comparison ofBRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decom-pression and fusion:clinical and radiographic results of a ran-domized,controlled,clinical trial[J].Spine,2009,34:101-107.
  • 5John G.Heller,Rick C.Sasso,et al.Comparison of BRYAN Cer-vical Disc Arthroplasty With Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion[J].Spine,2009,34﹙2﹚:101.
  • 6Murrey D,Janssen M,Delamarter R,et a1.Results of the pros-pective,randomized,controlled multicenter Food and Drug Ad-ministration in.vestigational device exemption study of the ProDi-sc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease[J].Spine,2009,9:275-286.
  • 7Riew KD,Buchowski JM,Sasso R,et a1.Cervical disc arthropla-sty compared with arthrodesis for the treatnlent of myelopathy[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2008,90:2354-2364.
  • 8A.Nabhan,F.Ahlhelm,T.Pitzen,et a1.Disc replacement using Pro-Disc C versus fusion:a prospective randomised and control-led radiographic and clinical study[J].Eur Spine,16:423-430.
  • 9Chagas H,Domingues F,Aversa A. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy:10 years of prospective outcome analysis of anterior decompression and fusion[J].Surgical Neurology,2005,(4):30-35.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-1062.2010.04.022.
  • 10Cloward RB. The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks[J].Journal of Neurosurgery,1958.602-617.

引证文献12

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部