期刊文献+

国有企业高管选拔公文筐测试的信效度研究 被引量:2

A Research on the Reliability and Validity of In-Basket Test used in Selecting Executives in State-Owned Enterprises
下载PDF
导出
摘要 结合广州某区大型国有企业高管人员选拔所采用的公文筐测试,利用数据统计分析技术,包括相关分析、多重线性分析、探索性因素分析等方法,综合分析研究公文筐测试的信效度。结果表明,公文筐测试具有良好的信度(α信度系数为0.902);各维度之间的相关为0.317-0.825,维度得分与总分之间的相关为0.677-0.901;多重线性分析结果显示,各维度间不存在共线性。探索性因素分析的数据指标表明,各项拟合指标均达到理想水平,结构效度较好。 To analyze and study the reliability and validity of In-Basket Test by combining the Test applied in selecting executives for a large state- owned enterprise in a district of Guangzhou. Com- prehensive utilization of data analysis es, inclu- ding correlation analysis, multiple linear analysis, exploratory factor analysis, analysis of reliability and validity of test results. This In- Basket Test has good reliability (with a reliability coefficient of 0. 902) ; The correlation coefficient between va- rious dimensions is 0. 317 -0. 825, scores and to- tal score contain a correlation coefficient between 0. 677 - 0. 901 ; multiple linear analysis shows that collinearity does not exist between various dimen- sions of linear. Exploratory factor analysis of data indicators illustrates that each fit index has a- chieved the desired level of good construct validi- ty. In- Basket Test used in the executive selection test has good reliability and validity.
出处 《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第3期9-13,207,共5页 Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 广东省哲学社会科学"十一五"规划项目<评价中心技术的应用性研究>(批准号:GD10CGL08)
关键词 公文筐测试 胜任特征模型 结构效度 Key words: In-Basket Test Competency Model Construct ValidityKey words: In-Basket Test Competency Model Construct Validity In-Basket Test Competency Model Construct Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Hakstian A. P. , Scratchley L. S.. In - basket Assessment by Fully Objective Methods: Development and Evaluation of a Self - report System [ J ]. Education and Psychologi- cal Measurement, 1997, (4).
  • 2Richard C. Joines. The General management in- basket (GMIB) technical report[ R]. Management & Personnel Systems, INC. 2007.
  • 3PGW Jansen, BAM Stoop. The dynamics of assessment center validity : Results of a 7 -Year Study[J]. Journal of Aoolied Psychology, 2001, (4).
  • 4Sackett Paul R. , Tuzinski Kathleen A.. The Role of Di- mensions and Exercises in Assessment Center Judgments [ N ]. London, Manuel ( Ed ). How People Evaluate Others in Organizations. Applied in Psychology,2001.
  • 5Mark C, B. , David J. W.. A Meta -Analytic Evalua- tion of the Impact of Dimension and Exercise Factors on Assessment Center Ratings [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psy- chology. 2006, (5).
  • 6Bernd Marcus, R.D. Goffin, N.G. Johnston, et al. Personality and cognitive ability as predictors of typical and maximum managerial performance [ J ]. Human Per- formanee, 2007, (3).
  • 7Brannick Michael T. , Michaels Charles E. , Baker David P.. Construct Validity of In - basket Scores [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989, (6).
  • 8Paul R. Sackett and George F. Dreher. Constructs and assessment center dimensions: Some troubling empirical findings [ J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982, (4).
  • 9Peter Bycio, Kenneth M.. Alvares and June Hahn. Situa- tional specificity in assessment center ratings: a confirm- atory factor analysis [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987, (3).
  • 10Rolland Jean Perre. Construct Validity of In - basket Dimensions [ J ]. European Review of Applied Psychol- ogy,1999, (3).

二级参考文献41

  • 1吴志明,张厚粲.评价中心的构想效度和结构模型[J].心理学报,2001,33(4):372-378. 被引量:37
  • 2[1]Task Force on Assessment Center Guidelines. Guidelines and Ethical Considerations for Assessment Center Operations, 1989. 1~2
  • 3[2]Russell C J. Individual Decision Processes in an Assessment Center. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985, 70:737~746
  • 4[3]Gaugler B B, Thornton Ⅲ G C. Number of Assessment Center Dimensions as a Determinant of Assessor Accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989, 74:611~618
  • 5[5]Jansen P, Jongh F D. Assessment Centers: A Practical Handbook. JOHN WILEY & SONS, 1997.25~26
  • 6[6]Ryan A M, Daurn D B, Todd G. Direct, Indirect, and Controlled Observation and Rating Accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology,1995, 80:664~670
  • 7[7]Lievens F. Assessor Training Strategies and Their Effects on Accuracy, Interrater Reliability, and Discriminant Validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86:255~264
  • 8[8]Schleicher D J, Day D V. A New Frame for Frame-Of-Reference Training: Enhancing the Construct Validity of Assessment Centers.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002, 87:735~746
  • 9[9]Murphy K R. Criterion Issues in Performance Appraisal Research: Behavioral Accuracy Versus Classification Accuracy.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50:45~50
  • 10[10]Thornton Ⅲ G C, Zorich S. Training to Improve Observer Accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, 65:351~354

共引文献18

同被引文献5

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部