被告人零口供情状下的证据审查与认定模式研究——以受贿案为论证视角

Study on Examination and Affirmation-model of Evidence in Defendant′s Naught Confession

由于侦讯和审判模式的制约,我国法官对口供具有依赖的思维惯性,但在以"一对一"的权钱交易方式为表征的受贿案中,被告人零口供往往导致法官认定受贿事实成立时捉襟见肘,不过这并不能成为放松惩治受贿行为的借口。法官在想方设法收集证据的基础上,采用合理的证据审查和认定模式,是逾越被告人零口供带来的审判障碍的必然路径。其具体模式包括:一是查证赃款赃物的去向或用途;二是重视证人证言的查证;三是适时运用隐蔽作证模式;四是重视间接证据收集并把握它们之间的关联性。本文进而根据上述四种模式得出唯一合理结论。

Our country judge has inertial thinking that convicted defendant depends on its confession eonditioned under investigation and judgment. But when bribee and briber take one-for-one way deal, we are very difficult to verdict bribe-taking in defendant＇s naught confession. Nothing in power-for-money but we should loos- en bribe action on the basis of pretext. Taking reasonable way of evidence examination and judge is an inevita- ble model for solving the problem. Including four areas, checking illicit money＇s whereabouts, paying attention to testimony of the witness＇ investigation, reasonable taking model of guarantee for witness right, paying atten- tion to relation among circumstantial evidence. And then we take presumption of fact to reach a reasonable con- clusion.