交通肇事罪之“逃逸”解析——以台湾肇事致人死伤逃逸罪为借鉴

Analysis of "Escape Case" in Traffic Accident Crime——Using Taiwan Crime of Escape after Traffic Offences for Reference

关于为何加重处罚交通肇事逃逸,我国学界长期以来争论不休。理论界主要存在的"逃避法律追究说"和"不救助被害人说"都不能指明交通肇事后逃逸与其他犯罪后逃逸的区别,因此也就无法合理解释处罚交通肇事后逃逸的原因所在。而借鉴台湾地区的刑法学理论,"确认利益说"说明了交通肇事后逃逸的特别之处,因而是可取的。

Scholars have been debating on the issue of the reason of aggravation of penalty of escape case in traffic accident crime for a long time.The theories of ＂escaping the punishment ＂and ＂not salvaging victim＂ are popular in China's Mainland,but they can not demonstrate the differences between traffic offence and other crimes.So they are not the best answer.The theory of ＂confirmed interests＂ which comes from Taiwan can explain the specialty of traffic offence.It is advisable.