期刊文献+

腰大池持续引流治疗重症颅内感染的疗效观察 被引量:6

The Efficacy Observation of Continuous Lumbar Drainage for the Treatment of Severe Intracranial Infection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察探讨腰大池持续引流治疗重症颅内感染的临床疗效,总结其临床价值。方法选取我院2007年3月至2010年5月84例重症颅内感染的患者,随机分为观察组和对照组各42例,观察组采用腰大池持续引流治疗,对照组采用传统单纯静脉点滴抗生素治疗,观察对比两组治疗效果,记录相关数据进行统计学分析。结果经治疗后,观察组显效25例,有效10例,无效7例,发生并发症2例,占4.76%,总有效率83.3%;对照组显效17例,有效5例,无效20例,发生并发症8例,占19.0%,总有效率52.4%,两组治疗效果及并发症发生率差异显著(P<0.05),具有统计学意义。结论腰大池持续引流治疗重症颅内感染的临床疗效明显优于传统的抗生素治疗,且不良反应小,并发症发生率较低,值得在临床上合理推广应用。 Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of continuous lumbar drainage for the treatment of severe intracranial infection,to summarize its clinical value.Methods In our hospital from March 2007 to May 2010 84 cases of severe intracranial infection were randomly divided into the observation group and control group,42 cases in each group,the observation group was given continuous lumbar drainage treatment,the control group was given the traditional simple intravenous drip antibiotics treatment,to observe and compare the treatment effect of two groups,and to record the data for statistical analysis.Results After treatment,in the observation group there were 25 cases with marked effect,10 cases with effect,7 cases with no-effect,the complications occurred in 2 cases,accounting for 4.76%,the total effective rate was 83.3%;in control group there were 17 cases with marked effect,5 cases with effect,20 cases with no-effect,the complications occurred in 8 cases,accounting for 19.0%,the total effective rate was 52.4%,The treatment effect of two groups and incidence of complications were significantly different(P 0.05),with statistical significance.Conclusion The clinical efficacy of continuous lumbar drainage for the treatment of severe intracranial infection was superior to conventional antibiotic treatment,and it has side effects,lower incidence of complications,so it deserves the clinical application.
作者 张贵升
出处 《临床医学工程》 2011年第9期1404-1405,共2页 Clinical Medicine & Engineering
关键词 腰大池持续引流 重症颅内感染 临床疗效 Continuous lumbar drainage Severe intracranial infection Clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献8

共引文献37

同被引文献39

  • 1胡深,杨佳勇,魏学忠,傅炜昕,岳亚丁.影响颅脑外伤术后颅内感染的危险因素分析[J].中华神经医学杂志,2006,5(5):498-502. 被引量:32
  • 2刘丽丹,刘军,季学成.持续腰大池引流治疗重症颅内感染[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2006,16(6):642-643. 被引量:21
  • 3李文胜,郭英,王辉,梁潮峰,龚瑾.静脉及鞘内联合用药治疗脑室外引流术后颅内感染[J].中华神经医学杂志,2006,5(10):1048-1049. 被引量:9
  • 4张海涛,徐恩胜.脑室外引流加腰大池引流治疗高血压脑出血破入脑室48例临床体会[J].中华神经外科杂志,2007,23(6):457-457. 被引量:41
  • 5A1- Tamimi YZ, Bhargava D, Feltbower RG, et al. I.urnbar drain age of cerebrospinal fluid after aneurysmal subarachnoid hereof rhage: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial [J]. Stroke, 2012,43(3) :677- 682.
  • 6Allen KP, Isaacson B, Purcell P, et al. Lumbar subarachnoid drain-- age in cerebrospinal fluid leaks after lateral skull base surgery[J]. Otology Neurotology,2011,32(9) : 1522 - 1524.
  • 7王永哲.持续腰大池引流术治疗颅脑损疗效观察.中国农村卫生,2014(z2):415-416.
  • 8Korinek AM, Baugnon T, Golmard JL, et al . Risk factors for adult nosocomial meningitis after craniotomy: role of anti- biotic prophylaxis[-J'). Neurosurgery, 2006,59(1) : 126-133.
  • 9Korinek AM, Golmard JL, Elcheick A, et al . Risk factors for neurosurgical site infections after craniotomy: a critical re- appraisal of antibiotic prophylaxis on 4,578 patientsl-J~. Br J Neurosurg, 2005,19(2) : 155-162.
  • 10Staykov D, Speck V, Volbers B, et al . Early recognition of lumbar overdrainage by lumboventricular pressure gradient I-J]. Neurosurgery, 2011, 68(5): 1187-1191.

引证文献6

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部