摘要
由于效率标准的局限性,而且国有经济也不必然是低效率的,因此效率标准并非选择"国有"抑或"民营"的唯一依据。在一定条件下,"国有"在扩大社会供给方面具有更大的比较优势,因而国家干预社会生产的一个很重要的原因是市场不能提供满足社会消费需求空间的合意的产品。从一定意义上说,如果将"国有"理解为因行业或企业由于获得政府所构建并控制的"公共领域"资源而形成的相应权利,而将"民营"理解为行业或企业通过自身投资形成的相应权利,则"供给"可以成为"国有"抑或"民营"的一种替代性政策依据。
Because the efficiency standard can be limited,and the state-owned economy is not necessarily inefficient,efficiency should not be the only standard in choosing 'state-owned' or 'private'.In given conditions,'state-owned' has more comparative advantage in expanding social supply,so a reason for the state intervention in social production is the market fails to supply desirable products meeting the demand space of social consumption.In a sense,if 'state-owned' is interpreted as an industry or enterprise's attendant rights resulting from receiving 'public resources' built and controlled by the government,and 'private' interpreted as their attendant rights developed by self-investment,'supply' can thus become an alternative policy basis to 'state-owned' or 'private'.
出处
《当代经济研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第9期60-64,92,共5页
Contemporary Economic Research