保证期间的本体论批判

Criticizing the Ontology of the Guaranty Period

保证期间是我国保证制度中最具争议的法律概念之一。当用法学本体论的方法对其进行批判分析时,会发现保证期间是个难以自圆其说的多余概念。首先,"保证期间"缩减了"保证期限"的概念范围;其次,混淆了"保证期间"与"保证责任期间"的本质区别;第三,保证期间是把一个概念正反两方面的命题揉在一起的错误概念;第四,有关保证期间的法律性质的界定永远在一个圆圈里打转,无法自拔。要消除保证期间带来的矛盾和烦恼,只有取消它。

When using a critical analysis method of legal ontology, we will know that the guaranty period is difficult to justify the extra concept. Firsly, the ＂ guaranty period＂ reduces the ＂ warranty period＂ concept range; Secondly, the confusion of the ＂ guaranty period＂ and ＂ responsibility of e guaranty period＂. Thirdly, guaranty period is the concept of positive and negative aspects; Finally, the legal nature of the guaranty period is always defined in a circle round and round. To eliminate the conflicts and troubles caused by guaranty period, we have to cancel it.