期刊文献+

行政复议的定位之争 被引量:62

On the Discussion of the positioning of Administrative Reconsideration
原文传递
导出
摘要 我国行政复议制度的功能定位应当是解决行政争议,监控行政权的行使和保护行政相对人的合法权益,是这一功能的副产品,而且是基于这一功能必然产生的副产品。但考察制度层面却发现,因为行政复议的定位偏差,已经造成行政复议制度发挥作用和发展的迟滞。要让行政复议制度走出困境,需要梳理现实问题,重新审视行政复议的功能定位。行政复议的定位应当是与其他行政活动或者行政行为有区别的,在性质上更接近司法活动,是准司法性的现实表现,制度架构以及其他相应的配套措施均应以这一定位为准绳。 The functional positioning of administrative reconsideration is to settle administrative disputes, and monitoring the exercise of executive power and protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the executive relative are the inevitable by - product. It can not function well and develop hard because of the error positioning of administrative reconsideration. If we want to get the administrative reconsideration system out of the woods, we need to sort out practical problems and re - examine the functional positioning. In my opinion, the positioning of administrative reconsideration should be different from administrative activities, and it should be a kind of quasi -judicial activities, from which to put forward corresponding measures and institutional framework.
作者 刘莘
出处 《法学论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期10-15,共6页 Legal Forum
关键词 行政复议 功能定位 准司法 行政程序 administrative reconsideration, functional positioning of administrative reconsideration, quasi - judicial activities, administrative procedure
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

共引文献18

引证文献62

二级引证文献400

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部