期刊文献+

急性白血病椎体骨髓浸润的扩散加权成像研究 被引量:11

Vertebral bone marrow infiltration of acute leukemia: diffusion-weighted imaging study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨椎体骨髓单方向扩散屏气DWI方法,分析急性白血病(AL)患者椎体骨髓浸润DWI的临床应用价值。方法对42例确诊AL患者和15名健康志愿者行胸腰椎矢状面单次激发回波平面DWI(SS—EPI—DWI)序列扫描(b值为0、650s/mm^2),扩散方向为头-足(S/I)、前-后(A/P)和左-右(R/L)方向,每个方向DWI采集时间均为12S,闭气采集。分别在3个方向的ADC图上测量多个椎体骨髓的ADC值,比较3个扩散方向的ADC值的差别。AL患者分为初发未治疗组13例和治疗组29例[初发治疗未缓解(NR)组7例。初发治疗完全缓解(CR)组8例、治疗巩固组14例]。比较不同治疗阶段AL患者ADC值的差异用方差分析、t检验,ADC值与骨髓原始细胞比例的相关性采用Pearson分析。结果57例受试者362个椎体S/I、A/P和R/L方向的ADC值分别为(0.758±0.009)、(0.732±0.009)、(0.758±0.009)×10^-3mm^2/s,三者之间ADC值的差异无统计学意义(F=2.958,P〉0.05)。15名健康志愿者94个椎体ADC值为(0.697±0.122)×10^-3mm^2/s,13例初发未治疗组85个椎体ADC值为(0.592±0.071)×10^-3mm^2/s,两者差异具有统计学意义(t=2.568,P〈0.05);29例治疗组AL患者183个椎体ADC值为(0.796±0.225)×10^-3mm^2/s,与初发未治疗组比较,差异有统计学意义(t=1.332,P〈0.05);初发治疗CR组+巩固治疗组共140个椎体ADC值为(0.786±0.184)×10^-3mm^2/s,初发治疗NR组43个椎体ADC值为(0.804±0.327)×10^-3mm^2/s,两者差异无统计学意义(t=-0.160,P〉0.05)。初发未治疗组的S/IADC值与骨髓象原始细胞比例(中位数26.4%,范围7.9%~48.2%)呈线性负相关(r=-0.524,P〈0.05)。结论椎体骨髓DWI为各向同性,单方向屏气DWI能提高图像质量。初发AL患者ADC值降低,化疗后ADC值增加,初发组ADC值与骨髓象原始细胞比例呈线性负相关。 Objective Using single direction dispersion breathless DWI, to analyze the value of DWI for vertebral bone marrow infiltration in patients with acute leukemia (AL). Methods Forty-two patients with AL and 15 healthy volunteers received vertebral sagittal DWI with single shot spin-echo echoplan imaging (SS-SE-EPI) sequence(b value = 0,650 s/mm^2) at a GE Signa Excite 1.5 T scanner with 8 channels body coil. DWI for all patients were performed from three directions, including from superior to inferior (S/I), from anterior to posterior (A/P) and from right to left (R/L). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value was measured on ADC map from each direction using GE-Function tool DWI software. Forty two patients consisted of 13 onset with untreated patients and 29 treated patients (7 nonremission,8 complete remission and 14 consolidation therapy). The ADC values among the three diffusion directions were compared. Analysis of variance and t test were used to compare the ADC values in different AL stages, Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between ADC values and the percentage of bone marrow progenitor ceils. Results The ADC values from S/I, A/P and R/L of 362 vertebras in the 57 subjects are (0. 758 ±0. 009) ×10^-3mm^2/s, (0. 732 ±0. 009) ×10^-3mm^2/s and (0. 758 ± 0. 009) ×10^-3mm^2/s, respectively. There is no statistical significance ( F = 2. 958, P 〉 0. 05 ). The ADC values from S/I of 94 vertebras in 15 healthy volunteers is (0. 697± 0. 122) ×10^-3mm^2/s, of 85 vertebras in 13 untreated AL patients is (0. 592 ±0. 071)×10^-3mm^2/s. There is statistical significance between them(t = 2. 568,P 〈 0. 05) ;The ADC value of 183 vertebras in 29 treated AL patients [ (0. 796 ± 0. 225) ×10^-3mm^2/s ] is higher than that in untreated patients with statistical significance (t = - 1. 552, P 〈 0. 05). One hundred and forty vertebras in patients with complete remission and consolidation therapy were [ (0. 786±0. 184) ×10^-3mm^2/s] ,and 43 vertebras in patients with non-remission(NR) [ (0. 804 ± 0. 327 ) ×10^-3mm^2/s ], there was not statistical significance between them( t = - 0. 160, P 〉 0.05 ). The ADC values from S/I direction of untreated patients showed significant negative correlation with the proportion of the blast cell in the bone marrow ( median value 26. 4%. Min 7.9% , Max 48.2% ) ( r = - 0. 524, P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusions DWI of vertebral bone marrow is isotropy. ADC value is a non-invasive and quantitative index for evaluating the pathogenetic condition of AL.
出处 《中华放射学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第9期807-811,共5页 Chinese Journal of Radiology
基金 山西省青年科技研究基金资助项目,山西省青年学科带头人资助项目,山西医科大学博士基金资助项目,山西医科大学第二医院博士启动基金资助项目
关键词 白血病浸润 骨髓 磁共振成像 弥散 脊柱疾病 Leukemia infiltration Bone marrow Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging Spinal diseases
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Tamura T, Usui S, Murakami S, et al. Biexponential signal attenuation analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging of breast. Magn Reson Med Sci, 2010, 9:195-207.
  • 2牛金亮,王峻,郝文静,苏晋生,李文晋,郑英.急性髓细胞白血病全身骨髓浸润MRI与血清VEGF含量的相关性研究[J].临床放射学杂志,2009,28(5):670-673. 被引量:3
  • 3Raya JG, Dietrich O, Reiser MF, et al. Techniques for diffusion- weighted imaging of bone marrow. Eur J Radiol, 2005, 55: 64 -73.
  • 4Herneth AM, Philipp MO, Naude J, et al. Vertebral metastases: assessment with apparent diffusion coefficient. Radiology, 2002, 225 : 889-894.
  • 5Biffar A, Dietrich O, Sourbron S, et al. Diffusion and perfusion imaging of bone marrow. Eur J Radiol, 2010, 76:323-325.
  • 6Kwee TC, Takahara T, Ochiai R, et al. Whole-body diffusion- weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol, 2009, 70: 409-417.
  • 7尚伟,余卫,林强,冯逢,李保庆,田均平.MR扩散加权成像评估椎体骨量状况的初步研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2008,42(9):966-968. 被引量:3
  • 8Chan JH, Peh WC, Tsui EY, et al. Acute vertebral body compression fractures : discrimination between benign and malignant causes using apparent diffusion coefficients. Br J Radiol, 2002, 75:207-214.
  • 9Moulopoulos LA, Dimopoulos MA. Magnetic resonance imaging of the bone marrow in hematologic malignancies. Blood, 1997, 90: 2127-2147.
  • 10Nonomura Y, Yasumoto M, Yoshimura R, et al. Relationship between bone marrow cellularity and apparent diffusion coefficient. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2001, 13:757-760.

二级参考文献20

  • 1Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, et al. Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res, 1993, 8: 1137-1148.
  • 2Hemeth AM, Philipp MO, Naude J, et al. Vertebral metastases: assessment with apparent diffusion coefficienL Radiology, 2002, 225 : 889-894.
  • 3Yeung DK, Wong SY, Grittith JF, et al. Bone marrow diffusion in osteoporosis : evaluation with quantitative MR diffusion imaging J Magn Reson Imaging, 2004, 19: 222-225.
  • 4Zhou XJ, Leeds NE, McKinnon GC, et al. Characterization of benign and metastatic vertebral compression fractures with quantitative diffusion MR imaging. AJNR , 2002, 23: 165-170.
  • 5Shih T'F, Chang CJ, Hsu CY, et al. Correlation of bone marrow lipid water content with bone mineral density on the lumbar spine. Spine, 2004, 29: 2844-2850.
  • 6Verma S, Rajaratnam JH, Denton J, et al. Adipocytic proportion of bone marrow is inversely related to bone formation in osteoporosis. J Clin Pathol, 2002, 55: 693-698.
  • 7Sotak CH. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient ( ADC ) of tissue water and its relationship to cell volume changes in pathological states. Neurochem Int, 2004, 45 : 569-582.
  • 8Baur A, Reiser MF. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the musculoskeletal system in humans. Skeletal Radiol, 2000, 29: 555 -562.
  • 9Pelosi E,Messa C,Sironi S,et al.Value of integrated PET/CT for lesion localisation in cancer patients:a comparative study.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging,2004,31:932
  • 10Matuszewski L,Persigehl T,Wall A,et al.Assessment of bone marrow angingenesis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia by using contrast-enhanced MR imaging with clinically approved iron oxides:initial experience.Radiology,2007,242:217

共引文献4

同被引文献76

引证文献11

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部