期刊文献+

我院221例剖宫产围手术期抗菌药应用分析 被引量:1

Analysis of the Application of Antibiotics in 221 Cases of Perioperative Cesarean Sections in our Hospital
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:了解我院剖宫产手术后患者应用抗菌药的情况,并评价其应用的合理性。方法:对我院2009年221例剖宫产手术患者围手术期抗菌药应用品种、使用率、联合用药、使用方法等进行统计分析。结果:221例剖宫产患者100%应用抗菌药。使用率最高的是头孢硫脒(45.7%);其中单一用药169例,二联用药52例,无三联及以上用药。结论:剖宫产患者在抗菌药的选择、开始用药时间、疗程等方面存在着不合理现象,应进一步加强剖宫产围手术期抗菌药的合理应用。 Objective :To understand the application of antibiotic for patients after surgery section and to evaluate its application of rationality. Method: Antibiotic application varieties, DDDs, drug combination and method of application were analyzed in 221 patients who underwent perioperative cesarean sections in 2009. Result:Antibiotics were used in 221 patients with cesarean section in the preoperative midterm except 1 case. The antibiotic utilization rate was about 100%. The utilization rate at top being cefathiamidine accounted for 45.7% , 169 cases received their single drug medication, 52 cases received their two-drug medication andno patients received their triple-drug or more than three-drug medication. Conclusion: There were some unreasonable phenomena in patients with cesarean section in the choice of antibiotics, time of the beginning of a drug and treatment time ; therefore, the reasonable use of antibiotic should be further strengthened in perioperative cesarean section.
作者 刘斌
出处 《药物流行病学杂志》 CAS 2011年第9期468-470,共3页 Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology
关键词 剖宫产 抗菌药 合理用药 Cesareansection Antibacterialagents Rational drug use
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献19

共引文献168

同被引文献35

  • 1方英立,谢青,周文.剖宫产患者围手术期抗菌药物应用分析[J].中国医院药学杂志,2006,26(1):59-60. 被引量:16
  • 2Martin, J.A., Hamilton, B. E.,Sutton, P. D.et al.,Births: final data for 2005 [J]. Natl Vital Stat Rep, 2007,56(6):1-103.
  • 3MacDorman, M.F., Menacker, F., and Declercq, E.,Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes[J]. Clin Perinatol, 2008,35(2):293-307,.
  • 4Gomes, U.A., Silva, A. A., Bettiol, H.et al. ,Risk factors for the increasing cae- sarean section rate in Southeast Brazil: a comparison of two birth cohorts, 1978- 1979 and 199d[J]. Int J Epidemiol, 1999,28(4):687-94.
  • 5Leung, G.M., Lain, T. H., Thach, T. Q.et al., Rates of cesarean births in Hong Kong: 1987-1999[J]. Birth, 2001,28(3):166-72.
  • 6Mishra, U.S. and M. Ramanathan, Delivery-related complications and determi-nants of caesarean section rates in India[J]. Health Policy Plan, 2002, 17(1):90-8.
  • 7AbouZahr, C.K, Lessons on safe motherhood[J]. World Health Forum, 1998,19(3): 253-60.
  • 8Tita, A. T., Rouse, D. J., Blackwen, S.et al., Evolving Concepts in Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2009,113 (3):675-682.
  • 9Smaill, F. and G.J. Hofmeyr, Antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean section[J]. Cochrane Database Svst Rev, 2002(3):CD000933.
  • 10Hopkins L, S. and Smaill, F., Antibiotic prophylaxis regimens and drugs for cesarean section[J]. The Cochrane Library, 2000,4:1-52.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部