期刊文献+

以创意论成果,以成果论英雄:提升自主创新能力从改革学术评价标准做起 被引量:3

Evaluating the Achievements based on Creativity,and Recognizing Academic Laureates According to their Achievements Only
下载PDF
导出
摘要 区分原始创新与原始创意具有重要意义。通过及时识别和鼓励原始创意,既可以识别潜在的优秀人才,又能够提高从原始创意到原始创新的成功率,及时鼓励自主创意比鼓励自主创新更有意义。诺贝尔奖奖励的是成功地发展成为原始创新的原始创意,广义诺贝尔奖法则还包括对通过查新和确认无颠覆性错误的原始创意和重要的科技创意的奖励,秉承诺贝尔奖的"唯成果论"法则,实现"以创意论成果,以成果论英雄"。通过创新点清单展示型成果盘点法和知识英才三问识别法,能够及时有效地识别知识英才及潜在的知识英才。 Distinguishing between original innovation and original ideas is of great significance. By means of the timely recognition and encouragement of original ideas, we can not only identify potential talents, but also improve the success rate to move from original ideas to original innovation. It is more meaningful to give timely encouragement to independent creativity than to independent innovation. The Nobel Prize awards have designed to recognize the original ideas that later successfully develop into original innovation. The "Nobel Prize Rule" in its broader sense also involves rewarding the original ideas and important scientific creativity whose novelty and non-disruptive attributes have been confirmed. By adhering to the Nobel Prize principle in which "Achievements form the sole criterion", we can realize the scheme of "evaluating the achievements based on creativity, and recognizing academic laureates according to their achievements only". Through the practice of "Achievement evaluation based on display of innovative points" and the approach of "Three inquiries for identifying intellectual talents", we can timely and effectively identify intellectual talents and potential intellectual talents.
作者 刘益东
出处 《未来与发展》 2011年第9期40-46,共7页 Future and Development
关键词 原始创新 原始创意 种子创意 广义诺贝尔奖法则 创新点清单展示型成果盘点法 知识英才三问识别法 original Innovation original Idea aeed Idea generalized nobel prize rule achievement evaluation based on display of innovative points three inquiries for identifying intellectual talents
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献12

  • 1黄平,彭小妍,刘禾,王跃飞.关于学术定量化的讨论[J].读书,2002(2):50-58. 被引量:13
  • 2乔治·弗兰克.注意力—科学界看不见的手[J].世界科技研究与发展,2000,(2):96-96.
  • 3罗伯特·S·艾伯特;方展画.天才和杰出成就,1988.
  • 4张五常.思考的方法.
  • 5陈平.查看详情.
  • 6张五常.查看详情.
  • 7詹姆斯·格莱克.在科学前沿阵地,1988(02).
  • 8何瑜洁.另一种天大资源浪费!从95%的科研论文是垃圾说起.
  • 9刘益东.智业革命--致毁知识不可逆增长逼迫下的科技转型、产业转型与社会转型,2007.
  • 10刘益东.电子学务:下一次科学革命[J].跨世纪,2008,16(3):211-219. 被引量:5

共引文献23

同被引文献41

  • 1黄平,彭小妍,刘禾,王跃飞.关于学术定量化的讨论[J].读书,2002(2):50-58. 被引量:13
  • 2邱均平,朱少强,刘永.“金牌优先”法则应用于科研人才评价的思考[J].图书情报知识,2006,23(4):101-104. 被引量:15
  • 3王国龙.ISI高被引作者概述[J].中国索引,2007,5(2):48-52. 被引量:1
  • 4张铭清.话语权是文化软实力的重要指标[N].光明日报,2009-12-15.
  • 5刘益东.电子学务革命与创新人才特区的创建-人才革命是解决金融危机和自主创新问题的突破口.跨世纪,2009,(5).
  • 6张国强.话语权-美国为什么总是赢得主动(从政者与媒体领袖不能不看的"国家启示录")[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2011.
  • 7张国祚.约瑟夫.奈.对话"软实力"[N].光明日报,2012-07-10(011).
  • 8[美]约瑟夫·奈.权力的大未来[M].王吉美,译,北京:中信出版社.2012:18.
  • 9徐晓虎,陈圻.智库是什么?[N].中国社会科学报,2011-05-26(011).
  • 10马文·鲍尔.麦卡锡本色[M].曾琳,译,北京:中国人民大学出版社.2010:9-10.

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部