期刊文献+

发光二极管荧光显微镜在基层应用的多中心研究 被引量:7

Multicenter study of application of fluorescent-staining light-emitting diodes fluorescence microscope at county level in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价荧光染色发光二极管荧光显微镜涂片镜检(简称LED)在基层实验室的应用情况。方法对研究期间到6个县(区)级结核病防治机构(简称结防机构)就诊的肺结核可疑症状者3691例和随访患者2509例,以及8例没有记录初诊随访患者的共11 288份痰标本进行涂片镜检,每份标本涂2张片,分别使用萋尼(简称Z-N)和LED法进行染色、镜检,比较两种方法在阳性检出率及读片时间等方面的差异。结果 LED法的阳性涂片检出率为11.20%(1264/11 288),较Z-N法(8.59%,970/11 288)提高2.61%(χ2=8086.74,P=0.000)。读片时间LED[(120.03±38.88)s]明显短于Z-N法[(206.31±75.86)s](t=28.12,P=0.00)。结论基层实验室使用LED较Z-N能够提高涂片镜检的阳性检出率,且读片时间明显缩短,在我国基层实验室应用具有较好前景。 Objective To assess the application status of fluorescent-staining light-emitting diodes fluorescence microscope(LED) in laboratories at county level in China. Methods Two smears were prepared for each sputum from 11288 specimens coming from 3691 pulmonary tuberculosis suspects,2509 follow-up patients and 8 cases without record of diagnosis or follow-up.Each of smears were followed with Zeihl-Neelsen(Z-N) and LED respectively.The comparison of smear positive detection rate and reading time between two methods were made. Results The smear positive detection rate using LED were 11.20%(1264/11288),2.61% higher than that of Z-N(8.59%,970/11288)(χ^2=8086.74,P=0.000).The mean reading time with LED(120.03±38.88)s was significantly shorter than that with Z-N(206.31±75.86)s(t=28.12,P=0.00). Conclusion LED method could increase smear positive detection rate and shorten reading time compared with Z-N,so application of LED at county level laboratories is in prospect.
出处 《中国防痨杂志》 CAS 2011年第9期592-595,共4页 Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis
基金 中国卫生部与比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会结核病防治项目(2009-04-01)
关键词 结核 肺/诊断 显微镜检查 荧光 多中心研究 Tuberculosis,pulmonary/diagnosis Microscopy,fluorescence Multicenter study
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

共引文献6

同被引文献51

  • 1胡培磊,谭云洪,刘丰平,易松林,龙海波,谭笑,陈忠南,龚道方.发光二极管荧光显微镜在痰涂片抗酸杆菌检测中的应用评价[J].结核病与肺部健康杂志,2012,1(3). 被引量:1
  • 2樊学军,孙敏.结核病实验室诊断技术的比较研究[J].中国国境卫生检疫杂志,2005,28(3):160-162. 被引量:19
  • 3刘建军.中国结核病防治规划-痰涂片镜检质量保证手册[M].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2004,1.
  • 4Trusov A, Bumgarner R, Valijev R, et al. Comparison of LuminTM LED fluorescent attachment, fluorescent microscopy and Ziehl - Neels- en for AFB diagnosis[ J ]. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2009,13 (7) : 836 - 841.
  • 5Van Deun A, Chonde TM, Gurnusboga M, et al. Performance and ac- ceptability of the FluoLED Easy module for tuberculosis fluorescence microscopy[J]. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis,2008,12(9) : 1009 - 1014.
  • 6赵雁林.中国结核病防治规划一痰涂片显微镜检查标准化操作及质量保证手册[M].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2009.7.
  • 7中国疾病预防控制中心.中国结核病防治规划痰涂片镜检标准操作及质量保证手册[M].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2009.7-14.
  • 8中华人民共和国卫生部疾病预防控制局,中国疾病预防控制中心.痰涂片镜检标准化操作及质量保证手册.北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2009:4-9.
  • 9Pio A, Luelmo F, Kumaresan J, et ah National tuberculosis programme review: experience over the period 1990-1995 [J]. Bull World Health Organ, 1997,75 (6) 569 581.
  • 10Steingart KR, Henry M, Ng V, et al. Fluorescence versus conven tional sputum smear microscopy for tuloerculosis: a systematic re view[J]. Lancet Infect Dis, 2006,6 (9) : 570-581.

引证文献7

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部