期刊文献+

不同靶浓度瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚对妇科开腹手术患者七氟烷MACBAR的影响 被引量:1

Effects of different target concentrations Remifentanil combined with Propofol on MACBAR of Sevoflurane in patients undergoing gynecological laparotomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价不同靶浓度瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚对七氟烷抑制50%妇科开腹手术患者切皮诱发应激反应的最低肺泡有效浓度(MACBAR)的影响。方法:择期拟行妇科开腹手术患者120例随机分为4组,各30例,SA组不使用瑞芬太尼;SB组、SC组和SD组瑞芬太尼效应室浓度分别为1.5、2.0和2.5μg/L。气管插管后吸入七氟烷和血浆浓度为1.5μg/ml的丙泊酚TCI,新鲜气流量8 L/min。SA组气管插管后不给予瑞芬太尼,其余组分别按设定目标靶浓度输注瑞芬太尼。根据序贯法进行试验,SA组、SB组、SC组和SD组初始呼气末七氟烷浓度分别为2.8%、1.5%、1.2%和0.9%,根据患者对切皮的反应(切皮时MAP和HR中任何一项升高幅度≥切皮前的25%为阳性反应)以1.2倍等比级增减,计算七氟烷MACBAR。结果:SA组七氟烷MACBAR为2.1%(1.8%~2.3%),SB、SC和SD组七氟烷MACBAR是1.5%(1.3%~1.6%)、1.1%(1.0%~1.2%)和0.8%(0.7%~0.9%)。与SA组比较,SB组、SC组和SD组七氟醚MACBAR均降低(P<0.05);与SB组比较,SC组和SD组七氟醚MACBAR均降低(P<0.05);SD组与SC组比较MACBAR又降低(P<0.05)。结论:复合丙泊酚靶控输注时瑞芬太尼靶控效应室靶浓度1.5、2.0和2.5μg/L均可降低七氟烷MACBAR,增强七氟烷抑制应激反应的效应,且呈浓度依赖性。 Objective: To investigate the effects of three different plasma effect-site concentration(Ce) of Remifentanil given by TCI on the minimum alveolar concentration of Sevoflurane for blunting adrenergic responses to skin incision(MACBAR) in patients undergoing gynecological laparotomy with TCI of Propofol.Methods: 120 patients undergoing elective gynecological laparotomy were randomly divided in 4 groups(30 cases each),control group(group SA) and 3 Remifentanil gro ups(group SB,SC,SD).The patients were unpremedicated.Anesthesia was induced with TCI of Propofol(target plasma concen tration 3.0 ug/ml) and TCI of Remifentanil(Ce 4 μg/L).Tracheal intubation was facilitated with rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg after the patients lost consciousness.The patients were mechanically ventilated.And then anesthesia was maintained with inhalation of Sevoflurane and TCI of Propofol(target plasma concentration 1.5 μg/ml),fresh gas flow set at 8 L/min maintaining for at least 20 min.In group SA Remifentanil was not given after intubation.In group SB,SC and SD,Remifentanil was given at Ce of 1.5,2.0 and 2.5 μg/L respectively.In group SA,SB,SC and SD,Sevoflurane inhalation was started with the initial end-tidal concentration of 2.8%,1.5%,1.2% and 0.9% respectively.The patients’ response to skin incision was described as positive if MAP or HR increased by ≥25%,or negative(MAP or HR increased by 〈25%).If the response positive,the end-tidal concentration of Sevoflurane for the next patient was increased by 1.2 times,while if negative,deceased by 1.2 times.The Sevoflurane MACBAR was determined by up-and-down sequential trial.Results: In group SA,SB,SC and SD,the MACBAR of Sevoflurane was 2.1%(1.8%-2.3%),1.5%(1.3%-1.6%),1.1%(1.0%-1.2%) and 1.1%(1.0%-1.2%).Compared with group SA,the MACBAR of Sevoflurane significantly decreased in group SB,SC and SD(P〈0.05).Compared with group SB,the MACBAR of Sevoflurane was decreased in group SC(P〈0.05).Compared with group SC,the MACBAR of Sevoflurane decreased in group SD(P〈0.05).Conclusion: Compounded with TCI of Propofol,TCI of Remifentanil at Ce of 1.5,2.0 and 2.5 μg/L can significantly reduce MACBAR of Sevoflurane and enhance the inhibitory effect of Sevoflurane on stress response in a concentration-dependent matter.
出处 《中国医药导报》 CAS 2011年第27期64-66,共3页 China Medical Herald
关键词 麻醉药 吸入 瑞芬太尼 丙泊酚 药物释放系统 剂量效应关系 应激 Anesthetics Inhalation Remifentanil Propofol Drug release system Dose-response relationship Stress
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Albertin A,Casato A,Bergonzi P.Effects of two target controlled concentrations(1 and 3 ng/ml)o f Remifentanil on MACBAR of Sevoflurane[J].Anesthesiologgy,2004,100(2):255-259.
  • 2胡彦艳,黄中华,梁宁,秦丹丹,包延丽.靶控输注异丙酚复合瑞芬太尼对腹腔镜胃肠手术应激反应的影响[J].中国临床新医学,2009,2(3):238-240. 被引量:1
  • 3Leman J,Davis PJ,Welborn LG,et al.Induction,recovery,and safety characteristics of sevoflurane in children undergoing ambulatory surgery.A comparison with halothane[J].Anesthesiology,1996,84(6):1332-1340.
  • 4Daniel M,Weiskopf RB,Noorani M.Fentanyl augments the blockade of the sympathetic response to incision (MAC-BAR) produced by desflurane and isoflurane:desflurane and isoflurane MAC-BAR without and with fentanyl[J].Anesthesiology,1998,88(1):43-49.
  • 5Katoh T,Kobayashi S,Suzuki A.The effects of fentanysl on Sevoflurane requirements for somatic and sympathetic responses to surgical incision[J].Anesthesiology,1999,90(2):398-405.
  • 6Katoh T,Nakajim Y,Moriwaki G.Sevoflurane requirements for tracheal intubation with and without fentanyl[J].British Journal of Anesthesia,1999,82(4):561-565.
  • 7Kntoh T,Ikeda K.The minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration(Mac)of Sevoflurane in humans[J].Anesthesiology,1987,66(3):301-303.
  • 8Roizen MF,Horrigan RW,Frazer BM.Anesthetic doses blocking adrenergic(stress)and cardiovascular responses to incision-MAC_(BAR)[J].Anesthesiolotg,1981,54(5):390-398.
  • 9Shafer A,Doze VA,Shafer SL.Phsrmacokineties and pharmacodynamics of Propofol infusiom during general anesthesia[J].Anesthesiology,1988,69(3):348-356.
  • 10陆军,朱美华,岳伟.丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼在神经外科手术全麻诱导中的联合应用[J].中外医学研究,2010,8(22):26-27. 被引量:4

二级参考文献6

  • 1Thompson JP,Hall AP,Russell J,et al.Effect of remifentanilon the hameodynamic resPonse to orotracheal intubation.Br J Anaesth,1998,80(4):467-469.
  • 2Sneyd JR Camu F,Doenicke A,et al.Remifentanil and fentanil during anesthesia for major abdominal and gynaecological surgery.An oPen comparative study of safety and efficacy0.Eur J Anaesth,2001,18:605.
  • 3Martijn,Mertens,Erik Olofsen,et al.Propofol reducesPerioperative remifentanil requiements in asynergistic manner.Anesthesiology,2003,(99):347-359.
  • 4王祥瑞,俞卫锋,杭燕南.吸入麻醉药.当代麻醉药理学丛书.北京:世界图书出版社,2008:104-109.
  • 5邵兵,赖朝蓬.雷米芬太尼临床药理学及临床应用研究进展[J].现代诊断与治疗,2003,14(3):173-175. 被引量:39
  • 6孙海燕,薛富善,李平,杨冬,李成文,孙海涛,刘鲲鹏.气管插管型喉罩通气道与直接喉镜经口气管插管对血流动力学影响的比较性研究[J].麻醉与监护论坛,2003,10(5):347-349. 被引量:23

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部