期刊文献+

食管胃结合部腺癌 被引量:4

Adenocarcinoma of esophago-gastric junction
原文传递
导出
摘要 近年来食管胃结合部癌肿发病率明显上升,欧美国家年增长率达5%~10%,逐渐引起人们的重视。1987年德国学者Siewert提出“食管胃结合部腺癌”的概念,定义为食管胃结合部上下5cm区域内的腺癌,分为3型。亚洲以Ⅱ型和Ⅲ型多见,5年生存率没有差别;西方国家则3种类型比例相当。其中Ⅰ型预后最好,Ⅲ型最差。目前认为这是一种不同于食管癌和胃癌的特殊类型癌肿,其手术径路、术式和淋巴结清扫范围均未完全达成共识,也还缺少独立的TNM分期系统。本文就食管胃结合部腺癌的诊疗现状作一综述。 The incidence of gastroesophageal junction cancers is rapidly increasing, the Year' s upwards rate being more than 5%- 10%. Siewert in 1987 proposed a definition for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastrie junction (AEG), as a adenocarcinoma within 5 cm of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), and divided AEG in to three types. The majority of patients with AEG in Asian countries have type Ⅱ and Ⅲ cancers, and no obvious differences have been reported in 5-year survival rates between patients with different types of AEG. In contrast, in western countries, the distribution of each type of AEG is nearly equal,patients with AEG type Ⅰ cancer have the best prognosis, whereas the overall survival of patients with type Ⅲ cancer is the worst. Now people presume that the AEG is a special type of carcinoma which is not same as carcinoma of esophagus and stomach. The surgical routes and operative methods and the extent of lymph node dissection of AEG are still not completely clear, and AEG lacks also a independent TNM system for itself. We will gummarize the actuality of diagnosis and therapy of AEG.
作者 陈刚
出处 《国际外科学杂志》 2011年第9期621-624,共4页 International Journal of Surgery
关键词 食管胃结合部 腺癌 Siewert分型 手术方式 Esophagogastric junction Adenocarcinoma Siewert classification Operation methods
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Yuasa N, Miyake H, Yamada T, et al. Clinicopathologic compari- son of siewert type II and III adenoearcinomas of the gastroesopha- gem Junction[J]. World J Surg, 2006, 30(3) : 364-371.
  • 2Dolan K, Sutton R, Walker SJ, et al. New classification of esoph- ageal and gastric carcinomas derived from changing patterns in epi- demiology[J]. Br J Cancer, 1999, 80(516) : 834-842.
  • 3Siewert JR, Holscher AH, Becker K, et al. Cardia cancer: at- tempt at a therapeutically relevant classification [ J ]. Chirurg, 1987, 58(1): 25-32.
  • 4Chalasani N, Wo JM , Hunter JG , et al. Significance of intestinal metaplasia in different areas of esophagus including esophagogastric junction[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 1997, 42(3) : 603-607.
  • 5Eric Van Cutsema ,Cornelius Van de Velde, Amand Roth, et al. Expert opinion on management of gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarciuoma on behalf of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer( EORTC)- gastrointestinal eane- er group[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2008, 44(2) : 182-194.
  • 6Bird-Lieberman El, Fitzgerald RC. Oesophageal and gastro-oeso- phageal junction tumours [ J ]. Medicine, 2007,35 (4) : 199-203.
  • 7Andrew P, Barbour NP, Rizk G, et al. Ultrasound Predicts Out- comes for Patients with Adenocarcinoma of the Gastroesophageal Junction[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2007, 205(4): 593-601.
  • 8Kelly S, Harris KM, Berry E, et al. A systematic review of the staging performance of endoscopic ultrasound in gastro- oesophageal carcinoma[J]. Gut, 2001,49(4) : 534-539.
  • 9Wallace MB, Nietert PJ, Earle C, et al. An analysis of multiple staging management strategies for carcinoma of the esophagus: computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasound, positron emission tomography, and thoracoscopy/laparoscopy[ J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2002, 74(4): 1026-1032.
  • 10Sauvanet A, Mariette C ,Thomas P, et al. Mortality and morbidity after resection for adenecarcinoma of the gastreesophageal junction: predictive factors[J].J Am Coll Surg, 2005, 201 (2) : 253-262.

二级参考文献4

  • 1Greene FL, Compton CC, Fritz AG, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Atlas. New York: Springer, 2006.77-88,
  • 2Ishwaran H, Kogalur UB. Random survival forests for R. R News, 2007, 7(2):22-31.
  • 3Siewert JR, Stein HJ. Classification of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. Br J Surg, 1998, 85(11) :1457-1459.
  • 4Spechler SJ, Dixon MF, Genta R, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction. In: Hamilton SR, Altonen LA, eds. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Digestive System · WHO Classification of Tumours. Volume 2. Lyon: IARC Press, 2000. 31-36.

共引文献116

同被引文献47

  • 1吴健民.对肿瘤标志物的再认识[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(1):11-13. 被引量:116
  • 2Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics,2002 [J]. CA CancerJ Clin,2005,55(2):74 108.
  • 3Tew WP,Kelsen DP, Ilson DH. Targeted therapies for esopha- geal cancer [J]. Oncologist, 2005,10(8) : 59-60.35 39.
  • 4Dohmoto K, Hojo S, Fujita J, et al. Mechanisms of the release of CYFRA21-1 in human lung cancer cell lines [J]. Lung Cancer, 2000,30(1) ~55-63.
  • 5Sheard MA, Vojtesek B, Simickova M, et al. Release of cytokera- tin-18 and -19 fragments (TPS and CYFRA 21-1) into the extra- cellular space during apoptosis [J]. J Cell Bioehem,2002,85(4) : 670 677.
  • 6Wakatsuki M, Suzuki Y, Nakamoto S, et al. Clinical usefulness of CYFRA 21-1 for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in radia tiontherapy [J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2007,22(5)~715 719.
  • 7Yi Y, Li B, Wang Z, et al. CYFRA21-1 and CEA are useful markers for predicting the sensitivity to chemoradiotherapy of e- sophageal squamous cell carcinoma [J]. Biomarkers, 2009, 14 (7) =480 485.
  • 8Nakamura T,Ide H,Eguchi R, et al. CYFRA 21-1 as a tumor marker for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus[J]. Dis E- sophagus,1998,11(1)~:35 39.
  • 9Nozoe T,Rikimaru T,Mori E,et al. Increase in both CEA and CA19 9 in sera is an independent prognostic indicator in colorec tal carcinomaEJ]. J Surg Oncol, 2006,94(2) 132-137.
  • 10ParkBW,OhJW,KimJH,et al. PreoperativeCA15 3 and CEA serum levels as predictor for breast cancer outcomesEJ~. Ann Oncol,2008,19(4) ,675-681.

引证文献4

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部