行业协会治理与企业应对反倾销的博弈分析

A Game Analysis of the Trade Association's Governance and China's Firms Dealing with the Anti-dumping

由于应对反倾销的公共物品属性,单个企业从个体理性的角度出发却导致对每个个体次优选择的结果,陷入"公地悲剧",不符合集体理性。文章通过博弈分析得出作为非营利性的、增进同业利益的行业协会参与治理企业出口定价和在遭遇国外反倾销指控的条件下,协调涉案企业应诉和分摊应诉费用对提高中国企业应对反倾销的成效有着非常重要的意义,然后通过收集数据实证分析行业协会参与治理可以大大提高中国企业应对反倾销的积极性,在此基础上对中国行业协会改革提出建议。

Because dealing with the anti - dumping belongs to a kind of public goods, the fact that a single firm deals with anti -dumping from the individual rationality has led to the sub -optimal result, and they are trapped into the tragedy of the commons, which does not meet the collective rationality. By the game analysis, we get the conclusion that in China the trade association as a non - profit organization promotes the trades＇ interests par- ticipates in the governance of export pricing , helps our firms deal with the foreign anti - dumping charges and shares the litigation costs, which can help them improve the effectiveness of dealing with anti -dumping, then by empirical analysis we prove the conclusion, on this basis, the opinions are proposed.