期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

反强制性外交透析

Perspective of Anti-coercive Diplomacy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 反强制性外交是因应强制性外交而产生的一种方略,其目的是通过采取各种措施,阻止、转移或消除强制性外交带来的风险。研究反强制性外交的基本内涵、形成原因、主要策略和实施功效,既可以纠正这一领域过度分析强制国的偏差,又可以更清晰地展示受制国的主体性和能动性,全面认识这种动态关系的特征。 The anti-coercive diplomacy is a strategy emerging in response to coercive diplomacy with the purpose of preventing, shifting or eliminating risks caused by coercive diplomacy. Studying the connotations, cause, strategy and effects of the anti-coercive diplomacy will help this field correct the deviation for over-analysis the coercive country and will obviously demonstrate the subjectivity and initiative of the coerced country in order to get an overall understanding on characteristics of this dynamic relation.
作者 魏光启
机构地区 南京大学国际关系研究院
出处 《江南社会学院学报》 2011年第3期56-60,共5页 Journal of Jiangnan Social University
基金 安徽阜阳师范学院2010年人文社科项目"强制性外交研究"(项目编号:2010FSSK12)阶段性成果
关键词 强制性外交 反强制性外交 强制国 受制国 Coercive Diplomacy Anti-coercive Diplomacy Coercive Country Coerced Country
分类号 D80 [政治法律—外交学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Alexander L. George, David K. Hall and William E. Simons. The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy[ M]. Boulder, Colo : Westview Press , 1994 : 7 -10.
  • 2Peter V. Jakobsen, Nigel Clive. Western Use of Coercive Diplomacy after the Cold War: A Challenge for Theory and Practice[ M ]. New York : St. Martins Press, 1995 :11 - 17.
  • 3Robert J. Art, Patrick M. Cronin. The United States and Coercive Diplomacy [ M ]. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2003 : 7.
  • 4钱春泰.美国与强制外交理论[J].美国研究,2006,20(3):49-64. 被引量：13
  • 5[美]罗伯特·阿特.国际政治--常在概念和当代问题(第七版)[M].时殷弘,吴征宇译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007:188-192.

二级参考文献36

  • 1[美]詹姆斯·多尔蒂 小罗伯特·普法尔茨格拉夫著 阎学通 陈寒溪.《争论中的国际关系理论》[M].北京:世界知识出版社,2003年版.第631页.
  • 2Alexander L. George and William E. Simons,eds. , The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy 2nd edn. (Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1994),pp. 7-10.pp.8-9.p.54.pp.270-290.p.16.p.281.p.288.
  • 3Alexander L. George, ed. , Avoiding War: Problems of Crisis Management (Boulder, Colo:Westview Press, 1991), p. 380.
  • 4Gary Schaub, "Compellence: Resuscitating the Concept," Strategic Coercion: Concepts and Cases, ed. Lawrence Freedman (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), p. 38.p.329.pp.58-59.
  • 5Robert S. Ross, "The 1995-1996 Taiwan Strait Confrontation: Coercion, Credibility, and the Use of Force," International Security, Vol. 25, No. 2 (Fall 2000), p. 88.
  • 6Mark R. Amstutz, International Conflict and Cooperation: An Introduction to World Politics (Boston: McGraw-Hill College, 1999), pp. 210-211.
  • 7Gordon A. Craig and Alexander L. George, Force and Statecraft: Diplomatic Problems of Our Time, 3rd edn. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995), p. 196.
  • 8Charles W. Kegley and Gregory A. Raymond, From War to Peace: Fateful Decisions in International Politics (Peking University Press & Thomson Learning, 2003), p. 275.
  • 9Peter Viggo Jakobsen, Western Use of Coercive Diplomacy after the Cold War: A Challenge for Theory and Practice (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1998), pp. 100-101.pp.20-23.
  • 10Alexander L. George, "The Role of Force in Diplomacy: A Continuing Dilemma for U.S. Foreign Policy," The Use of Force after the Cold War, ed. H. W. Brands (College Station: Texas A & M University Press, 2000), p. 81.

共引文献12

江南社会学院学报
2011年 第3期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部