期刊文献+

善恶观:可欲为善、公意为善 被引量:1

Goodness as the Desirable Selfishness and Goodness as the Public Opinion——A View of Goodness and Evilness
下载PDF
导出
摘要 善恶是人类价值的基本形态。扬善去恶是人格修养的基本准则。然而,究竟什么是善,什么是恶,我们认识得并不很清楚。一种常见的观点是把善恶视为一种固定不变的客观品质或属性,善即理性、利他之举,恶即欲望、自私之举。其实这是经不起事实考量的。另一种历史上流行的观点是用苦乐定善恶,认为善是给我们带来快乐的行为,恶是给我们造成痛苦的行为。其实这也经不起推敲。苦乐与其说是善恶的决定者,毋宁说是美丑的决定者。事实上,善恶是由包含私欲的社会公意决定的,满足者为善,背离者为恶。人类有超越历史和国家民族的社会公意,这就构成了善恶的普适性;不同的历史时期、不同的国度民族有不同的社会公意,这就决定了善恶的相对性。 It is well known that goodness and evilness are man's basic forms of value.While goodness is worthy of promotion,evilness deserves punishment,which is the essence of character accomplishment.But,what is the meaning for goodness and evilness? Maybe it is not very clear to everybody.A common view is considering goodness or evilness as one of man's unchangeable,objective characters.The former is reasonable,for the benefit of others;and the latter means appetency,showing selfness.Actually,it is a distortive interpretation.Another popular view in history is using bitterness or sweetness to replace goodness or evilness.While goodness brings about sweetness,evilness produces bitterness.That saying is also unbelievable.Bitterness or sweetness does not derive so much from goodness or evilness as from beauty or ugliness.As a matter of fact,goodness and evilness are determined by public opinions that comprise personal desires.Just as satisfying does goodness,dissatisfying produces evilness.Human beings have their public opinions of transcending national countries and histories,which make up the universality of goodness and evilness.And different histories or nations have different public opinions,which constitute the relativity of goodness and evilness.
作者 祁志祥
出处 《上海大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期71-78,共8页 Journal of Shanghai University(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 善恶 理欲 人我 苦乐 公意 相对性 goodness and evilness rational desire others and oneself bitterness and sweetness public opinion relativity
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1培根.培根论人生[M].张毅,译.上海:上海人民出版社,1983.
  • 2宾克莱.理想的冲突--西方社会中变化看的价值观念[M].北京:商务印书馆,1988:141.
  • 3包尔生.伦理学原理[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988:229.
  • 4周辅成.西方伦理学名著选辑:上卷[C].北京:商务印书馆,1987:95.
  • 5罗素.西方哲学史:上卷[M].北京:商务印书馆,1981:309.
  • 6北京大学哲学系美学教研室.西方美学家论美和美感[C].北京:商务印书馆,1982.
  • 7祁志祥,祁雪莺.美丑观:悦情为美、痛苦为丑[J].上海大学学报(社会科学版),2010,17(3):61-70. 被引量:2
  • 8爱因·兰德.客观主义的伦理学·自私的美德:利己主义的新概念[M].纽约:新美国世界文学文库,1964:17.
  • 9卢梭.社会契约论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1963.
  • 10黑格尔.小逻辑[M].北京:商务印书馆,1980..

二级参考文献17

  • 1彭锋.重提美学的阿基米德点[J].中国政法大学学报,2008(6):137-144. 被引量:3
  • 2笠原仲二.古代中国人的美意识[M].杨若薇,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1988.
  • 3朱立元.西方现代美学史[M].上海:上海文艺出版社,1996:907.
  • 4贡布里希.艺术的故事[M].上海:三联书店,1999:15.
  • 5梁启超.饮冰室文集:卷三十八[M].北京:中华书局,1936.
  • 6文艺美学丛书编委会.蔡元培美学文选[C].北京:北京大学出版社,1983.
  • 7包尔生.伦理学原理[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988:229.
  • 8劳伦斯.劳伦斯随笔集[M].北京:海天出版社,1993.
  • 9魏庆之.诗人玉屑:卷三十[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1978.
  • 10柏拉图.文艺对话集[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1963..

共引文献973

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部