摘要
西方科学哲学坚信任何一种科学知识都是从具体经验向"普遍概括"所做的一种"语义提升",只有通过各种方法彰显出与之相应的"经验蕴含",其科学的合法性基础才得以捍卫。其实,这早已被证明是一种貌似科学的偏见,它不能负载思想,焉能实现担当,非但不能护持,反而走向终结。语言学转向的种种努力将哲学引向了唯科学主义理路,狭隘的经验主义立场和"统一科学语言"的天真设想,将哲学转变为简单的技术操作和纯粹的句法分析,使之丧失了思想的多样性与丰富性,逐步沦为技术霸权的特殊注解,严重阻碍哲学思想发展的多元取向。
The western philosophy of science believes any kind of scientific knowledge is a "semantic ascending" from concrete experience to "universal summary".Its scientific legitimacy foundation is able to be defended only through various methods to reveal a corresponding "experience contain".In fact,it has proved to be a seemingly scientific bias.It can not load thoughts,not to mention their realization.It is supposed to go the end instead of defend.All the efforts of linguistic turn lead philosophy to scientism.The narrow empiricism position and the naive idea of "unified scientific language" turn philosophy into simple technology operation and pure syntactic analysis,make it lose the diversity and abundance of thoughts,and are seriously hampering the diversification of philosophical development path.
出处
《天中学刊》
2011年第5期20-24,共5页
Journal of Tianzhong
基金
河南省高校人文社科研究中心资助课题(RX10-12)
关键词
科学哲学
经验论立场
语言学转向
scientific philosophy
empiricism stance
linguistic turn