期刊文献+

突发交通事件信息影响下交通网络行为微观计量分析 被引量:1

Microscopic quantitative analysis of traffic network behavior under influence of unexpected event related information
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究了突发交通事件下地面道路可变情报板(SVMS)同时提供高架和地面道路行程时间条件下的驾驶员择路行为.采用意向行为调查获取择路行为数据,运用微观计量经济学中的离散选择分析方法对影响路径选择的因素进行了多变量分析,建立了描述择路概率的二元Logit模型.研究发现,SVMS信息对择路决策有显著影响,影响大小与驾驶员属性、信息内容及地面道路属性有关;驾龄越长、年龄越大的男性驾驶员,接收SVMS信息后选择地面道路的可能性更大;经常使用高架、认为高架可变情报板对其择路决策很有用的驾驶员,选择地面道路的可能性更小;高架延误越大、地面道路信号灯路口越少、延误原因为事故时,选择地面道路可能性更大.研究成果为交通突发事件下交通诱导策略优化提供理论依据和政策启示. Route choice corresponding to shorter street and urban freeway travel time displayed by street variable message signs (SVMS) was investigated. Stated preference survey was conducted to collect behavioral data, and a binary Logit model was established to identify the factors influencing drivers' route choice decisions. The results show that, SVMS has significant impact on route choice and the impact depends on driver attribute, street characteristics, and SVMS messages. Specifically, older male drivers with longer years of driving experience are more likely to choose local streets in response to freeway delay information indicated by SVMS frequent freeway users, having high acceptance of freeway VMS, are less likely to choose local streets ; longer freeway delay as well as freeway incident-induced delay and fewer signalized intersections on local streets serve as positive factors for choosing local streets. The study aims to give theoretical and policy implications for better design of unexpected events oriented traffic guidance strategy.
作者 干宏程
出处 《上海理工大学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2011年第4期345-349,共5页 Journal of University of Shanghai For Science and Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51008195) 上海市重点学科建设资助项目(S30504) 上海市教育委员会科研创新项目(09YZ205)
关键词 择路行为 地面道路可变情报板 离散选择分析 意向调查 高架快速路延误 二元 LOGIT模型 route choice street variable message signs discrete choice analysis stated preference survey freeway delay binary Logit models,
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1ABDEL-ATY M, ABDALLA P E F. Modeling drivers diversion from normal routes under ATIS using gener- alized estimating equations and binomial probit link function[J]. Transportation, 2004,31(3) : 327 - 348.
  • 2JOU RC,LAM S H,WENG M C,et al. Real time traffic information and ITS impacts on route switching be- havior of expressway drivers [J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2004,38 (2) : 187 - 223.
  • 3SRINIVASAN K K,MAHMASSANI H S. Analyzing het- erogeneity and unobserved structural effects in routes witching behavior under ATIS: A dynamic kernel logit formulation [J]. Transportation Research, Part B, 2003,37(9) :793 - 814.
  • 4EMMERINK R H M, NIJKAMP P, RIETVELD P, et al. Variable message signs and radio traffic informa- tion: An integrated empirical analysis of drivers' route choice behavior [J]. Transportation Research, Part A, 1996,30(2) : 135 - 153.
  • 5BEN-AKIVA M,DE PALMA A, KAYSI I. Dynamic network models and driver information systems [J]. Transportation Research, Part A, 1991,25(5) : 251 - 266.
  • 6BONSALL P. The influence of route guidance advice on route choice in urban networks [J]. Transporta- tion, 1992,19 : 1 - 23.
  • 7CHATTERJEE K,HOUNSELL N B, FIRMIN P E, et al. Driver response to variable message sign informa- tion in London [J]. Transportation Research, Part C, 2002,10(2) : 149 - 169.
  • 8WARDMAN M, BONSALL P W, SHIRES J D. Driver response to variable message signs: A stated prefer- ence investigation [J]. Transportation Research, Part C,1997,5(6):389 - 405.
  • 9BONSALL P, FIRMIN P,ANDERSON M,et al. Valida- ting the results of a route choice simulator [J]. Trans- portation Research, Part C,1997,5(6) :371 - 387.
  • 10LAI Ka-hun, WONG Wing-gun. SP approach toward driver comprehension of message formats on VMS[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2000,126 (3) :221 - 227.

二级参考文献27

  • 1黄海军.城市交通网络动态建模与交通行为研究[J].管理学报,2005,2(1):18-22. 被引量:13
  • 2干宏程,孙立军,陈建阳.提供交通信息条件下的途中改道行为研究[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2006,34(11):1484-1488. 被引量:24
  • 3GAN Hongcheng,SUN Lijun,CHEN Jianyang,et al.Advanced traveler information system for metropolitan expressways in Shanghai,China[J].Journal of Transportation Research Board,2006(1944):35.
  • 4Chatterjee K,Hounsell N B,Firmin P E,et al.Driver response to variable message sign information in London[J].Transportation Research:Part C,2002,10(2):149.
  • 5Wardman M,Bonsall P W,Shires J D.Driver response to variable message signs:a stated preference investigation[J].Transportation Research:Part C,1997,5(6):389.
  • 6Bonsall Peter,Firmin Paul,Anderson Monica,et al.Validating the results of a route choice simulator[J].Transportation Research:Part C,1997,5(6):371.
  • 7Emmerink Richard H M,Nijkamp Peter,Rietveld Piet,et al.Variable message signs and radio traffic information:an integrated empirical analysis of drivers' route choice behavior[J].Transportation Research:Part A,1996,30(2):135.
  • 8LAI Kahun,WONG Winggun.SP approach toward driver comprehension of message formats on VMS[J].Journal of Transportation Engineering,2000,126(3):221.
  • 9Ortuzar J de D,Willumsen Luis G.Modeling transport[M].3rd ed.New York:John Wiley & Sons,1994.
  • 10Abdel-Aty M, Abdalla P E F. Modeling drivers diversion from normal routes under ATIS using generalized estimating equations and binomial probit link function[J]. Transportation, 2004, 31 ( 3 ) : 327- 348.

共引文献65

同被引文献13

  • 1DILUM D, TAKAYUKI M. Household travel behavior in developing countries: nested Logit model of vehicle ownership, mode choice, and trip chaining[ J]. Transportation Res Record, 2002, 1805 : 45-52.
  • 2ALDER T, BEN-AKIVA M. A theoretical and empirical model of trip chaining behavior[ J]. Transportation Res B, 1979, 13 (3) : 243-257.
  • 3HE NSHER D A, REYES A J. Trip chaining as a barrier to the propensity to use public transport [ J]. Transportation, 2000, 27: 341-361.
  • 4YE X, PENDYALA R M, GOTTARDI G. An exploration of the relationship between mode ehoice and complexity of trip chaining patterns[ J]. Transportation Res B, 2007, 41: 96-113.
  • 5SCHMOCKER J D, SU F, NORLAND R B, et al. An analysis of trip chaining among older London resident[J]. Transportation, 2010, 37 : 105- 123.
  • 6TSENG Y Y, KNOCKAET J, VERHOEF E T. A revealed-preference study of behavioral impacts of real-time traffic information[ J]. Transporta- tion Res C, 2013, 30: 196-209.
  • 7FRANK L, BRADLEY M, KAVAGE S, et al. Urban form, travel time and cost relationship with tour complexity and mode choice[J]. Transpor- tation, 2008, 35(1 ): 37-45.
  • 8PRIMERANO F, TAYLOR M A P, PITAKSRINGKAM L, et al. Defining and understanding trip chaining behaviour[ J]. Transportation, 2008, 35:55-72.
  • 9GRAHAM C, ALEXA D. Exploring the trip chaining behaviour of public transport users in Melbourne[ J]. Transport Policy, 2011, 18 ( 1 ): 204- 210.
  • 10杨敏,陈学武,王炜,万涛.通勤出行简单链和复杂链的选择行为研究[J].武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版),2008,32(2):191-194. 被引量:22

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部