从《晨报副刊》看抵制日货之争

Disputes of Boycotting Japanese Goods from the "Morning Supplement"

1923年,由于日本政府拒绝归还租期届满的旅顺、大连以及6月份日本士兵在长沙制造了"六一惨案",国内掀起了一股"抵制日货"的高潮,与此同时,以《晨报副刊》为首的四大副刊从学理上展开了关于是否应该抵制日货的大讨论,这些学理的上的讨论主要集中在抵制日货是否是抵制日本侵略最有效的方法,抵制日货是否可能,抵制日货所造成的后果会怎样。从他们的争论中可以看出抵制日货之争实质是两种主义之争,是对国家态度之争。

In 1923,as the Japanese Government＇s refusal to return the lease to expire Port Arthur and Dalian as well as the Japanese soldiers created ＂6.1 tragedy＂ in Changsha then a national boycotting Japanese goods cone to a climax.At the same time,＂Morning Supplement＂ should have a discussion in this thing： whether to boycott Japanese goods to resist Japanese aggression and the most effective way to boycott,what is the consequences of boycotting Japanese goods,In fact,we can see a dispute of two kinds of doctrine and their national attitudes to the facts over it.