期刊文献+

喉全切除后食管音助发声器发音的客观声学分析 被引量:5

The Objective Acoustic Analysis of Oesophageal Voice by Speech Aid Appliance After Total Laryngectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过客观声学分析了解喉全切除术后食管音助发声器发音的发音质量。方法应用上海泰亿格公司的Dr.speed嗓音声学分析软件对7例食管音助发声器发音的患者(食管音助发声器发音组)及5例气管食管音患者(气管食管音组)的基频、基频微扰、振幅微扰、谐噪比、声强及最大发声时间进行检测,并与12名正常男性(对照组)进行比较。结果食管音助发声器发音组、气管食管音组的基频、基频微扰、振幅微扰、谐噪比,最大发声时间与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01),三组间声强比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),食管音助发声器发音组最大发声时间比气管食管音组长(P<0.05),其余指标与气管食管音组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论食管音助发声器发音的声音的声强可达77.40 dB、最大发声时间可达10.77秒,基本能够满足日常交流的需要。 Objective To objectively evaluate the acoustic quality of esophageal voice after total laryngectomy by speech aid appliance. Methods Twelve volunteers were included as traeheoesophageal pronunciation group; a total of 7 cases were included as group of oesophageal voice by speech aid appliance,and 12 cases of normal male were used as control group. Results Patients with oesophageal voice by speech aid appliance, fundamental frequency,jitter, shimmer and signal--to--noise ratio, the maximal phonation time and intensity of the vowel/a/ were measured. The acoustics ampling in oesophageal voice by speech aid appliance group and in traeheo--oesophageal speech group were lower than that of in nomal voice group, there were statistical significance(P〈0.05 or P〈0.01 ). There was no statistically significant difference between two groups (P〉0.05). Conclusion The oesophageal voice by speech aid appliance was more fluent,providirg the basic commnunication needs for the patients.
出处 《听力学及言语疾病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第5期419-421,共3页 Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology
基金 国家自然科学基金委员会资助项目(30973296)
关键词 喉全切除术 言语 声学分析 食管音 助发声器 Tatol laryngectomy Speech Acoustic analysis Oesophageal voice Speech aid appliance
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1高建中,马瑞霞,胡竞敏,杨培.喉全切除经鼻食管上段置管发声器[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2006,41(5):387-388. 被引量:2
  • 2高建中,马瑞霞,刘怀涛,杨培,郭宏庆,高小平,邵辉,保国华.食管音气流注入位置筛选与新发声方式的研究[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2005,19(21):981-984. 被引量:6
  • 3金国威,杨彩虹,徐开旭,徐增瑞,李少诚,陈杰,张建新,张作礼.气管食管裂隙状瘘发音重建术的声学分析[J].中华耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2003,38(3):225-228. 被引量:8
  • 4Debruyne F, Delaeve P,wouters J, et al. Acoustic analysis of traeheo--oeophageal versus oeophageal speech[J]. J--Larygngol and Otology, 1994,108 : 325.
  • 5Dinicola ML, Fiorella DA, Spinelli R. Fiorella,Analisi acustica della voce in soggetti sottoposti a laringectomia parziale sopracricoidea. Valutazione e revisione critica[J]. Acta Otorhino Laryngolital, 2006,26 : 59.
  • 6De Krom G. Consistency and reliability of voice quality ratings for different types of speech fragments[J]. J Speech Hear Res, 1994:37:985.
  • 7Comut G. Etude clinique de la voixdans lecadre dubilan phoniatrique. Oto Rhino - Laryngol, 1991,20753AI0, pp. 8.

二级参考文献17

  • 1卫旭东,金国威,李少诚,张建新,陈杰,王军.气管食管裂隙状发声孔发声机制研究[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2004,18(6):336-338. 被引量:3
  • 2高建中,马瑞霞,刘怀涛,杨培,郭宏庆,高小平,邵辉,保国华.食管音气流注入位置筛选与新发声方式的研究[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2005,19(21):981-984. 被引量:6
  • 3解光 杨仁中 彭元恩.全喉切除病人的食道音训练[J].现代康复,2002,4:995-995.
  • 4Baugh R F,Lewin J S,Bake S R. Preoperative assessment of tracheoesophageal speech. Laryngoscope, 1987,97:461-466.
  • 5Taub S. Air bypass voice prosthesis for vocal rehabilitation of laryngectomees.Ann J Otolaryngol,1975,84:45-48.
  • 6Blom E D,Singer M I, Hamaker R C. An improved esophageal insufflation test.Arch Otolaryngol,1985,111:211-212.
  • 7Bastian R, Muzaffar K. Endoscopic laser cricopharyngeal myotomy to salvage tracheoesophageal voice arter total laryngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2001,127:691-693.
  • 8Wittich DJ Jr, Davis RK. Laryngectomee nose-blowing.Laryngoscope, 1983 ,93 : 953.
  • 9金国威 郭晓力 张作礼 等.全喉切除后声门重建15例报告[J].天津医药,1990,18:487-488.
  • 10Debruyue F, Delaere P, Wouters J, et al. Acoustic analysis of tracheooesophageal versus oesophageal speech. J Laryngol Otol, 1994,108:325 -328.

共引文献13

同被引文献39

引证文献5

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部