期刊文献+

论侵权责任抗辩事由的配置及其体系 被引量:3

On System and Distribution of Defence Reason of Tort Liability
下载PDF
导出
摘要 侵权责任的抗辩事由的体系应当从两个角度建立:从是否能够阻却责任成立的角度看,抗辩事由应当分为阻却责任成立的抗辩事由和责任成立后的减责或免责的抗辩事由;从侵权责任类型的角度看,应当分为过错责任的抗辩事由和无过错责任的抗辩事由。同时,我们应当吸收英美法系国家判例法中的抗辩事由"精细化"模式的合理因素,对每一类具体的侵权责任,根据其特殊性再考虑是否需要配置特殊的抗辩事由。在此基础上,构建侵权责任抗辩事由的体系。另外,抗辩事由的配置应考量如国家或社会政策价值取向等诸多因素,以保证抗辩事由的配置的科学性和实用性。 The system and distribution of defence reason of tort liability mainly are construted from two angles.From the view of liability foundation whether to be prevented,the defence reason of tort liability should be classified into the defence reason of the liability foundation and the defence reason of the liability reduction or liability exemption;from the view of fault,the defence reason of tort liability should be classified into the defence reason of fault liability and the defence reason of not fault liability.At the same time,we should study the fine legal mode of British and American tort law,the special defence reason is distributed for every type tort liability according to need.On the basis of above,the system of defense reason of tort liability are construted.In addition,the various factors as national and social policy and so should is considered to ensure that the distribution of defence reason of tort liability is scientific and practical when the defence reason of tort liability is distributed.
作者 梅龙生
出处 《河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期71-75,共5页 Journal of Henan Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 侵权责任 抗辩事由 配置 体系 tort liability defence reason distribution system
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献348

  • 1李可.类型思维及其法学方法论意义——以传统抽象思维作为参照[J].金陵法律评论,2003(2):105-118. 被引量:83
  • 2刘士国.类型化与民法解释[J].法学研究,2006,28(6):11-20. 被引量:87
  • 3[1]康德.法的形而上学原理--权利的科学 [M].沈叔平译. 北京:商务印书馆,1999.46.
  • 4[2]拉伦茨.法学方法论[M].陈爱娥译.台湾:五南图书出版公司,1997.391.
  • 5[5]R.Pound.An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law[M].New Haven:Yale University Press.1959.67.
  • 6[6]弗朗西斯·福山.信任--社会美德与创造与经济繁荣[M].彭志华译.海口:海南出版社,2001.5.
  • 7[8]卡尔·拉伦茨.德国民法通论:上册[M].王晓晔等译.北京:法律出版社,2003.58.
  • 8idem, "Objektivierung des Fahrl. ssigkeitsma.stabes im Schadensersalzrecht?", 196 Archly flit die civilistische Praxis (1996), 593 ff.
  • 9European Group on Tort Law (n 5), 75 ff.
  • 10Le Tournean (n 91), no. 6707.

共引文献213

同被引文献22

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部