期刊文献+

下腰椎不同固定方式的生物力学对比研究 被引量:23

Biomechanics of different fixed patterns of low lumbar spine
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察下腰椎不同固定方式对腰椎稳定性的影响。方法新鲜成人尸体下腰椎标本6具,测定L4/5节段屈伸、左右侧屈、左右旋转6个方向ROM和刚度值的变化,按5组顺序依次测试:A组(正常下腰椎标本组);B组(单侧椎板关节突螺钉固定+椎间单枚Cage);C组(单侧椎弓根螺钉固定+椎间单枚Cage);D组(单侧椎弓根螺钉联合对侧椎板关节突螺钉固定+椎间单枚Cage);E组(双侧椎弓根螺钉固定+椎间单枚Cage)。结果与A组比较,B组各运动状态ROM有减少,而刚度明显增加,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);与B组比较,C组各运动方向ROM与刚度,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);与C组比较,D组各运动状态ROM有减少,而刚度增加,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);与E组比较,D组各运动方向ROM与刚度,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);与E组比较,C组各运动状态ROM有增加,而刚度减少,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论单侧椎板关节突螺钉固定并椎间融合器植骨方法提供了一定的稳定性,而单侧椎弓根螺钉联合对侧椎板关节突螺钉固定并椎间融合器植骨具有与双侧椎弓根螺钉固定相同的稳定性,临床上可根据病例的具体情况,如身高体质量指数、病变类型及病变节段稳定程度选择性地应用上述两种固定融合方法。 Objective To observe the effects of different fixed patterns on low lumbar spine stability. Methods The spine specimens from 6 fresh adult cadavers were divided into five groups: group A (normal low lumbar vertebrae specimen) ; group B (unilateral translaminar facet screw fixation and interbody fusion) ; group C (unilateral pedicle screw and interbody fusion) ; group D (unilateral pediele screw combined with contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation and interbody fusion) ; group E (bilateral pediele screw and interbody fusion ). A biomechanical test of compression in flexion, extension and lateral bending, as well as axial rotation, angular range of motion (Rom) and value of hardness was done. Results As compared with group A, ROM under every state of motion was decrease, and the stiffness was signifi- cantly increased in group B ( P 〈 0. 05 ). There was no significant difference in ROM and stiffness between groups B and C (P 〉 0. 05 ). As compared with group C, ROM was reduced and stiffness increased in group D ( P 〉0. 05 ). There was no significant difference in ROM and stiffness between groups D and E (P 〈 0. 05). As compared with group E, ROM was increased, and stiffness decreased significantly in group C ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion Unilateral laminar facet screw fixation with bone graft fusion cage meth- od provides a certain stability, and unilateral pedicle screw combined with contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation and interbody fusion provides the same stability as bilateral pedicle screw fixation. The two fixed patterns can be applied on the specific situations of the cases, as for baric index, pathclogical features and the stability of segmengtal lesions.
出处 《中华实验外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第10期1783-1785,共3页 Chinese Journal of Experimental Surgery
基金 浙江省卫生厅科研资助项目(2010KYB112)
关键词 下腰椎 螺钉 固定 椎间融合 稳定性 Low lumbar spine Screw Fixation Interbody fusion Stability
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献24

  • 1殷渠东,郑祖根,蔡建平.Pedicle screw fixation with translaminar facet joint screws for the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture[J].Chinese Journal of Traumatology,2004,7(6):354-357. 被引量:7
  • 2周跃,梅芳瑞,张峡,吴远清.保留脊柱后韧带复合结构多椎板切除术的生物力学研究[J].中华实验外科杂志,1994,11(5):267-267. 被引量:11
  • 3殷渠东,郑祖根,蔡建平,田小武.经椎板螺钉固定脊椎融合术治疗腰椎退变性不稳[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2005,20(11):737-739. 被引量:4
  • 4Foley KT,Holly LT,Schwender JD.Minimally invasive lumbar fusion.Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2003,28:S26-S35.
  • 5Beringer WF,Mobasser JP.Unilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.Neurosurgical Focus,2006,20:E4.
  • 6Suk KS,Lee HM,Kim NH,et al.Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spinal fusion.Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2000,25:1843-1847.
  • 7Wiltse LL,Bateman JG,Hutchinson RH,et al.The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine.J Bone Joint Surg Am,1968,50:919-926.
  • 8McKenna PJ,Freeman BJ,Mulholland RC,et al.A prospective,randomised controlled trial of femoral ring allograft versus atitanium cage in circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with minimum 2-year clinical results.Eur Spine J,2005,14:727-737.
  • 9Japanese Orthopaedic Association.Assessment of surgical treatment of low back pain.Jpn Orthop Assoc,1984,58:1183-1187.
  • 10Shah RR,Mohammed S,Saifuddin A,et al.Comparison of plain radiographs with CT scan to evaluate interbody fusion following the use of titanium interbody cages and transpedicular instrumentation.Eur Spine J,2003,12:378-385.

共引文献71

同被引文献237

引证文献23

二级引证文献152

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部