期刊文献+

微血管计数和侵入在肾细胞癌中的表达及意义 被引量:1

Expression and Significance of Microvessel Count and Microvascular Invasion in Renal Cell Carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨肾细胞癌(RCC)中微血管计数和微血管侵入情况与肾癌病理分期及术后发生转移的关系。方法采用Ⅷ因子和CD34两种标记染色方法检测88例RCC组织标本中微血管计数和微血管侵入情况,回顾性分析其与患者术后病理分期及是否发生转移的关系。患者随访4年以上,分为无复发转移组和复发转移组。结果用Ⅷ因子相关抗原标记下对RCC组织标本的微血管进行计数,术后4年无复发转移组和复发转移组中平均微血管数量分别为52.3和96.6,二者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。无复发转移组有微血管侵入者仅占总数42.3%,复发转移组中有微血管侵入者占76.5%(P<0.01);CD34标记下两者比例分别是47.1%和18.3%(P<0.05)。结论微血管计数和微血管侵入对预测RCC患者术后发生复发转移有参考意义,对于较易发生转移或复发的患者,术后应加强随访并考虑及早进行靶向治疗或其他辅助治疗。 Objective To investigate the relationship between tumor angiogenesis,microvascular invasion and the pathological staging,subsequent development of metastatic disease in patients who were undergone surgery for renal cell carcinoma(RCC).Methods Immunohistochemical method was used to detect Factor Ⅷ and CD34 which decorated endothelial cells in order to assess microvessel count and microvascular invasion and their relevance for developing metastatic disease in 88 cases of RCC.A retrospective analysis of the pathological staging and the development of metastatic disease was made.Patients was taken a follow-up visit of more than 4 years and divided into two groups:recidivation group and unrecidivation group.Results When Factor Ⅷ-related antigen staining was used,we found that the microvessel count correlated with the development of metastatic disease,with a mean count of 52.3 and 96.6 for patients who had non-developed and developed metastatic disease(P 0.01),respectively.We also found that microvascular invasion correlated with the development of metastatic disease.It was demonstrated that 76.5% of patients who developed metastatic disease versus 42.3% of patients with no evidence of metastasis with Factor Ⅷ staining(P 0.01) were positive,and 47.1% versus 18.3% with CD34 staining were positive,respectively(P 0.05).Conclusion Microvessel count and microvascular invasion in RCC might be a predictor of tumor aggression,for the patient who had easily got recidivation should have an enhanced follow-up visit,the targeted therapy or other adjuvant therapy should be taken into account early.
出处 《中国医科大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第9期794-796,共3页 Journal of China Medical University
基金 吉林省科技厅基金资助项目(20100736)
关键词 微血管计数 肾细胞癌 侵入 转移 microvessel count renal cell carcinoma microvascular invasion metastatic
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognoslie significance or morphologic parameters in renal cell eareinoma[J ]. Am J Surg Pathol, 1992, 6(2) : 655-660.
  • 2Slaton JW,Inoue K,Perrolte P,et al. Expression levels of genes that regulate metastasis and angiogenesis correlate with advanced pathological stage of renal cell carinoma [ J ]. Am J Pathol, 2001,158 ( 9 ) : 735-743.
  • 3Lang H, Lindner V, Saussine C, et al. Microscopic venous invasion : a prognostic factor in renat cell carcinoma[J ]. Eur Urol, 2000,38( 6 ): 600-605.
  • 4Hollingwnrth HC, Kohn EC, Steinberg SM, et al. Tumor angiogencsis in advanced stage nvarian carinoma[J ]. Am J Pathol, 1995, 147( 5 ) : 33-41.
  • 5Bochner BH, Cote R J, Weidner N, et al. Angiogenesis in bladder cancer:relationship between micrnvessel density and tumor prognosis [ J ]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1995,87 (4) : 1603-1612.
  • 6Campbeel SC. Advances in angiogenesis research:relevance to urological oncology[ J ]. J Urol, 1997,158( 11 ) : 1663-1674.
  • 7deKernion JB, BetTy D. The diagnosis and treatment of renal cell carcinoma[J]. Cancer, 1980,45( 7 Suppl ) : 1947-1956.
  • 8Sevni M, Kirkali Z, Yorukoglu K,et al. Prognostic significance of microvaseular invasion in loealized renal cell carcinoma [J].Eur Urol. 2000,38(6) :728-733.
  • 9Takebayashi Y, Natugoe S, Baba M, et al. Angiogenesis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Oncol Rep, 1998,5( 2 ) :401-404.
  • 10Yoshino S Kato M Okada K. Prognostic significance of microvessel count in low stage renal cell earcinoma[J]. Int J Urol, 1995,2( 3 ): 156-160.

同被引文献14

  • 1马建辉.肾细胞癌诊断治疗指南[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006: 37-38.
  • 2Tokuda N, Naito S, Matsuzaki O, et al. Collecting duct (Bellini duct) renal cell carcinoma: a nationwide survey in Japan[J]. J Urol, 2006, 176(1): 40-43.
  • 3Karakiewicz P I, Trinh Q D, Rioux-Leclercq N, et al.Collecting duct renal cell carcinoma: a matched analysis of 41 cases[J]. Eur Urol, 2007, 52(4):1140-1145.
  • 4Yousef G M, Ejeckam G C, Best L M, et al. Collecting duct carcinoma associated with oncocytoma[J]. Int Braz J Urol, 2005, 31 (5): 465-467.
  • 5Matei D V, Rocco B, Varela R, et al. Synchronous collecting duct carcinoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature[J]. Anticancer Res, 2005, 25 (1B): 579-586.
  • 6Ansari J, Fatima A, Chaudhri S, et al. Sorafenib induces therapeutic response in a patient with metastatic collecting duct carcinoma of kidney[J]. Onkologie, 2009, 32(1-2):44-46.
  • 7Miyake H, Haraguchi T, Takenaka A, et al. Metastatic collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney responded to sunitinib[J]. Int J Clin Oncol, 2011,16(2):153-155.
  • 8Bagrodia A, Gold R, Handorf C, et al. Salvage paclitaxel chemotherapy for metastatic collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney[J]. Can J Urol, 2008, 15(6):4425-4427.
  • 9Vázquez-Lavista L G, Uribe-Uribe N, Gabilondo-Navarro F.Collecting duct renal cell carcinoma: two different clinical stages, two different clinical outcomes[J]. Urol Int, 2008, 81(1):116-118.
  • 10Pepek J M, Johnstone P A, Jani A B. Influence of demographic factors on outcome of collecting duct carcinoma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database analysis[J].Clin Genitourin Cancer, 2009, 7(2): E24-27.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部