期刊文献+

Comparison of the Diagnostic Ability of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured using Time Domain and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma 被引量:11

Comparison of the Diagnostic Ability of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured using Time Domain and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Purpose:To evaluate and compare the diagnostic ability of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements using time domain (Stratus) and spectral domain (Cirrus HD) optical coherence tomography(OCT).in preperimetric and early primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods:A total of 62 eyes from 62 normal subjects,47 eyes from 47 early perimetric damage POAG patients and 30 eyes from 30 preperimetric glaucoma patients were chosen in the study.All the subjects underwent peripapillary RNFL thickness measurements using Stratus OCT and Cirrus HD-OCT on the same day by a single trained operator.The RNFL thickness measured by Stratus OCT and Cirrus HD-OCT was statistically compared using paired t-tests.The relationship between RNFL thickness measured by two OCT instruments was evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficient.Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AROC) were calculated and compared. Results:RNFL thickness measured using Stratus OCT was generally thicker than that using Cirrus HD-OCT(P<0.05). A highly significant correlation between the two OCT instruments measurements was found in four quadrants and average RNFL thickness measurements (P<0.001). The average RNFL thickness of Cirrus HD-OCT had significantly(P=0.006) higher diagnostic ability (AROC=0.951) than that of Stratus OCT(AROC=0.881) in preperimetric glaucoma. There were no significant differences between the AROCs for other RNFL thickness parameters from Cirrus HD-OCT and Stratus OCT in preperimetric and early glaucoma(P>0.05). Conclusion: Significant differences and an excellent correlation were noted in terms of RNFL thickness measurements using Stratus OCT and Cirrus HD-OCT. Cirrus HD-OCT presented higher diagnostic ability for preperimetric glaucoma. Purpose: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic ability of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements using time domain (Stratus) and spectral domain (Cirrus HD) optical coherence tomography (OCT) in preperimetric and early primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods: A total of 62 eyes from 62 normal subjects, 47 eyes from 47 early perimetric damage POAG patients and 30 eyes from 30 preperimetric glaucoma patients were chosen in the study. All the subjects underwent peripapillary RNFL thickness measurements using Stratus OCT and Cirrus HDOCT on the same day by a single trained operator. The RNFL thickness measured by Stratus OCT and Cirrus HD-OCT was statistically compared using paired t-tests. The relationship between RNFL thickness measured by two OCT instruments was evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AROC) were calculated and compared. Results: RNFL thickness measured using Stratus OCT was generally thicker than that using Cirrus HD-OCT(P〈0.05). A highly significant correlation between the two OCT instruments measurements was found in four quadrants and average RNFL thickness measurements (P〈0.001). The average RNFL thickness of Cirrus HD-OCT had significantly (P=0.006) higher diagnostic ability (AROC=0.951) than that of Stratus OCT(AROC=0.881 ) in preperimetric glaucoma. There were no significant differences between the AROCs for other RNFL thickness parameters from Cirrus HD-OCT and Stratus OCT in preperimetric and early glaucoma(P〉0.05). Conclusion: Significant differences and an excellent correlation were noted in terms of RNFL thickness measurements using Stratus OCT and Cirrus HD-OCT. Cirrus HD-OCT presented higher diagnostic ability for preperimetric glaucoma. ( Eye Science 2011 ; 26:132-137 )
机构地区 Shenzhen Eye Hospital
出处 《Eye Science》 CAS 2011年第3期132-137,142,共7页 眼科学报(英文版)
关键词 厚度测量 诊断能力 扫描测量 光学相干 断层扫描 青光眼 纤维层 视网膜 optical coherence tomography retinal nerve fiber layer glaucoma
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Blumenthal EZ, Williams JM, Weinreb RN, et al. Re- producibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements by use of optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107: 2278-2782.
  • 2Budenz DL, Fredette M J, Feuer W J, et al. Repro- ducibility of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber thickness measurements with stratus OCT in glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2008 ; 115 : 661-666.
  • 3Nagata A, Higashide T, Ohkubo S, et al. In vivo quan- titative evaluation of the rat retinal nerve fiber layer with optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009; 50: 2809-2815.
  • 4Schuman JS, Pedut-Kloizman T, Pakter H, et al. Opti- cal coherence tomography and histologic measurements of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous monkey eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007; 48: 3645-3654.
  • 5Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using op- tical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005; 139 : 44-55.
  • 6Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma: a study on optical coherence tomography guided progression analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51 : 217-222.
  • 7Bennett TJ, Barry CJ. Ophthalmic imaging today: an ophthalmic photographer's viewpoint - a review. Clin Ex- periment Ophthalmol. 2009; 37: 2-13.
  • 8Knight OJ, Chang RT, Feuer WJ, et al. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer measurements using time domain and spectral domain optical coherent tomography. Oph- thalmology. 2009 ; 116 : 1271-7.
  • 9Vizzeri G, Weinreb RN, Gonzalez-Garcia AO, et al. A- greement between spectral-domain and time-domain OCT for measuring RNFL thickness. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 ; 93 : 775-81.
  • 10Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical co- herence tomography: a variability and diagnostic perfor- mance study. Ophthalmology. 2009 ; 116 : 1257-63.

同被引文献8

引证文献11

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部