期刊文献+

急性脑梗死不同方式动脉溶栓治疗的临床研究 被引量:14

Individualized intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute cerebral infarction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨急性脑梗死患者不同方式机械性动脉溶栓治疗的方法、时间窗、溶栓药物剂量。方法选择海口市人民医院急性发病12h内的脑梗死患者60例,采用不同方式机械性动脉溶栓治疗(术中联合采用介入接触溶栓+导丝机械疏通、球囊机械扩张、支架拉栓和联合血管内支架成形术等),通过脑血管造影判断其血管丌通情况并对其治疗疗效(依据神经功能缺损评分)进行评估。结果60例急性脑梗死患者中血管完全再通率为55%(33/60).部分再通率为38.3%(23/60),未开通率为6.7%(4/60);临床治愈38例(63.3%),显著好转10例(16.7%),有效9例(15%),无变化3例(5%),死亡0例。结论经不同方式机械性动脉溶栓是急性脑梗死的一种安全有效的治疗方法。建立急救绿色通道和规范其治疗措施,能较好的提高急性脑梗死患者救治成功率,降低死亡率和致残率。 Objective To investigate the method, time window, dosage ofthrombolytic drug used in different intra-arterial thrombolytic therapies of patients with acute cerebral infarction Methods Sixty patients with acute cerebral infarction within 12 h were chosen in our study; they were treated by different intra-arterial thrombolytic therapies. The therapeutic effect (recanalization) were evaluated through cerebral angiography. Results The complete recanalization rate was 55% (33/60), partial recanalization rate 38.3% (23/60) and non-efficiency 6.7% (4/60). Thirty-eight patients (63.3%) were clinically cured, 10 (16.7%) obviously improved, 9 (15%) partially improved and 3 (5%) invalid; no death was noted. Conclusion Treatment of acute cerebral infarction by different intra-arterial thrombolytic therapies is safe and effective. The cure rate will be improved and the death rate and disability rate will be decreased by setting up first aid system and standard therapeutic measurements.
出处 《中华神经医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第9期892-895,共4页 Chinese Journal of Neuromedicine
基金 基金项目:海南省卫生厅科学研究课题(琼卫2010-78):海南省卫生厅重点医学科研立项课题(琼卫2010重点-07)
关键词 急性脑梗死 动脉内溶栓 疗效 Acute cerebral infarction Intra-arterial thrombolysis Therapeutic effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1脑卒中患者临床神经功能缺损程度评分标准(1995)[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):381-383. 被引量:15722
  • 2van Wijngaarden JD, Dirks M, Huijsman R, et al. Hospital rates of thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: the influence of organizational culture[J]. Stroke, 2009, 40(10): 3390-3392.
  • 3Evenson KR, Foraker RE, Morris DL, et al. A comprehensive review of prehospital and in-hospital delay times in acute stroke care[J]. Int J Stroke, 2009, 4(3): 187-199.
  • 4Yoon W, Park MS, Cho KH. Low-dose intra-arterial urokinase and aggressive mechanical clot disruption for acute ischemic stroke atter failure of intravenous thrombolysis [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2010, 31(1): 161-164.
  • 5Josephson SA, Saver JL, Smith WS, et al. Comparison of mechanical embolectomy and intraarterial thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke within the MCA: MERCI and Multi MERCI compared to PROACT II[J]. Neurocrit Care, 2009, 10(1): 43-49.
  • 6Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke [J]. N Engl J Med, 2008, 359(13): 1317-1329.
  • 7Sankaranarayanan R, Msairi A, Davis GK. Stroke complicating cardiac catheterization preventable and treatable complication[J]. J Invasive Cardiol, 2007, 19(1): 40-45.
  • 8胡汉楚,许康,陈小奇.rt-PA联合必存静脉溶栓治疗急性期脑梗死42例[J].实用医学杂志,2011,27(9):1668-1670. 被引量:22
  • 9陈秋红,陈辉.重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂静脉溶栓治疗急性脑梗死19例[J].实用医学杂志,2009,25(5):775-777. 被引量:17
  • 10Sugg RM, Noscr EA, Shaltoni HM, ct al. Intra-artcrial rctcplase compared to urokinasc for thrombolytic recanalization in acute ischcmic stroke[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2006, 27(4): 769-773.

二级参考文献32

共引文献15805

同被引文献129

引证文献14

二级引证文献127

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部