印度对华反倾销行为的驱动因素分析被引量：13

Factors Influencing Behavior of India’s Antidumping to China

导出

摘要本文结合印度经济转型背景,分析了其对华反倾销的总体特征和可能影响其裁决结果的政治经济因素。Logit模型检验结果发现,宏观经济因素在其裁决结果形成过程中表现出无关性,这有别于对发达国家的经验研究结论。印度对华反倾销的驱动因素在于产业层面:进口渗透的威胁和产业业绩下降往往会导致肯定裁决结果的出现;相比强势厂商,集中度较低、易受损害的弱势厂商受到更多照顾;具有战略意义的化工产业,无论在转型前后都得到了反倾销当局的特殊照顾;中国入世的制度因素并未对印度对华反倾销行为形成遏制。 India＇ s antidumping to China is a phenomenon we must pay attention to. Based on traditional political and economic literatures on trade protection and antidumping, this paper studies the overall features of India＇ s antidumping to China and potentially important political and economic factors. The result of Logit model indicates macroeconomic factor irrelative to behavior of India＇ s antidumping to China. Instead, driving factors lie in industry level. Less concentrated appealing enterprises and strategic chemistry industry have had more positive outcome. China＇ s access to WTO doesn＇ t play a strong role in restricting India＇ s antidumping.

作者王晰

机构地区湖南农业大学商学院

出处《国际贸易问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第10期69-80,共12页 Journal of International Trade

基金教育部人文社科项目“国际反倾销的政治经济学研究”(09YJC790081) 湖南省社科重点项目(2010ZDB51) 湖南农业大学国际贸易重点学科项目资助

关键词印度对华反倾销政治经济分析 India Antidumping to China Political and economic analysis

分类号 F752.62 [经济管理—国际贸易]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献12

1Nelson, Douglas., (1988) "Endogenous Tariff Theory: A Critical Survay," international Organlzatlbn 32 (August) : 796-837.
2Milner, Helen., (1988) "Resisting Protectionist Temptation: Industry and the Making of Trade Policy in France and United States," lnternationa! Orgamzation 41, 4 (Autumn) : 639-65.
3Hathaway, Oona., (1998) "Positive Feedback: The Impact of Trade Liberation on Industry Demand for Protection," International Orgamkation 52, 3 (Summer) :575-612.
4Prusa, T.J., (2001) "On Spread and Impact of Antidumping," Canadian Journal of Economics 34.3: 591-611.
5Niels, Gunna and Francois, Joseph F., (2004) Political Influence in a New Antidumping Regime: Evidence from Mexico (Manuscript) .
6Bhagwati J., Departure, (2001) "From Multilateralism:Regionalism and Aggressive Unilateralism," Journal of Economics 100, Dec.
7Niels, Gunna and Kate, Adriaan, T, (2004) Antidumping Protection in a liberalizing County." Mexico" s Antidumplng Policy and Practice, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
8Feinberg, R.M., (1989) "Exchange Rates and Unfair Tradem," Review of Economics and Statla-ics VOL 71:704-707.
9Knetter, M.M.and Prusa,T. J., (2003) "Macroeconomic Factors and Antidumping Filings: Evidence from Four Countries," Journal of International Economics VOL 61:1-17.
10Nandana Baruah, (2007) "An Analysis of Factors Influencing the Anti-dumping Behaviour in India," Thc World Economy 1, 467-497.