期刊文献+

大卫·刘易斯论因果性

David Lewis on Causation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现代哲学对于因果概念的讨论受惠于休谟,休谟关于因果概念有不同的定义。他除了从相继性、接近性和恒常联系三个特点定义因果关系,还从某种反事实条件关系描述了因果概念。大卫·刘易斯从事件之间的反事实依赖关系对因果性进行了细致分析,体现了剖析因果性概念的新视角,同时也充分表明大卫.刘易斯的模态实在论立场和反事实条件句逻辑在其系统哲学建构中的解释力。 The study of "causation" in modem philosophy owns a great deal to David Hume, who defined causation in two different ways. Causes and effects are defined from their contiguity, regular succession and constant conjtmetion, while in the other definition causation is analyzed in virtue of kind of counterfactuals, David Lewis noticed the latter and defined causation in terms of causal dependence among events, which in turn in terms of the counterfaetual dependence between two families of possible propositions. This eounterfaetual analysis indicates a new perspeetive on causation besides the regularity analyses. Moreover it is based on his modal realism and eounterfactual logic, which play a fundamental role in the construction of his systematic philosophy.
作者 张文琴
出处 《内蒙古大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期56-60,共5页 Journal of Inner Mongolia University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 大卫·刘易斯 反事实条件句 因果关系 反事实依赖关系 David K. Lewis counterfactuals causation counterfactual dependence
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1休谟.人性论[M].关文运译.北京:商务印书馆,1997.
  • 2万德勒.哲学中的语言学[M].陈嘉映译.北京:华夏出版社,2002.
  • 3休谟.人类理智研究[M].吕大吉译.北京:商务印书馆,1999.
  • 4David K. Lewis. Counterfactuals [ M ]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1973.
  • 5Frank Jackson, Graham Priest. Lewisian Themes : the Philosophy of David K. Lewis [ C ]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004.
  • 6David K. Lewis. On the Plurality of Worlds [ M ]. Oxford: Basil BlackweU, 1986.
  • 7David K. lewis. Philosophical Papers (Vol II) [ M ]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.
  • 8A· W· Burks. The logic of causal proposition[J]. Mind, 1951, (60).
  • 9David K. Lewis. Philosophical Papers(Vol I) [ M ]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,1983.
  • 10J. S. Mill, A System of Logic, Long- marts, 1941.

二级参考文献15

  • 1张家龙.可能世界是什么?[J].哲学动态,2002(8):12-17. 被引量:19
  • 2刘易斯.《论可能世界》,王永生译,陈波,韩林合主编.《逻辑与语言—分析哲学经典文选》,东方出版社,2005.
  • 3See P.V. Inwagen, Plantinga on Trans - World Identity, In James Tomberlin and Peter van Inwagen, eds. ,Alvin Plantinga, Dordrecht :Reidel, 1985, p. 119.
  • 4M. Jubien,Problem with Possible Worlds, In D. F. Austin, ed. , Philosophical Analysis, Dordrecht : Kluwer, 1988, p. 305.
  • 5T. Richards, The Worlds of David Lewis, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 53(1975) , pp. 105 - 18.
  • 6D. K. Lewis, On the Plurality of Worlds, Basil BlackweU, 1986, p. 108.
  • 7B. Skyrms, Possible Worlds, Physics and Metaphysics, Philosophical Studies, 30 (1976), pp. 326.
  • 8D. Lewis, Counterfactual, Cambridge, Mass., 1973, p. 84, p. 87, p. 87.
  • 9J. Melia. A Note on Lewis's Ontology, Analysis, (52) 1992, pp. 191 - 192.
  • 10W. Lycan, The Trouble with Possible Worlds, in Michael. J. Loux ( ed. ) , The Possible and the Actual: Readings in the Metaphysics of Modality, Cornell University Press , 1979 , p. 287, p. 290.

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部