期刊文献+

文拉法辛与氟西汀治疗成人抑郁症疗效和安全性的系统评价 被引量:3

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:系统评价文拉法辛与氟西汀治疗成人抑郁症的疗效与安全性。方法:通过计算机检索及手工检索,全面收集关于文拉法辛与氟西汀治疗抑郁症的随机对照试验(RCT)。计算机检索PubMed、MEDLINE、EMbase、ScienceDirect全文数据库、Cochrane Library、Springer全文数据库、中国知网全文数据库(CNKI)、中国维普全文数据库(VIP)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBMdisc)、万方全文数据库。对最终纳入的RCT按照Cochrane协作网系统评价的方法,严格评价纳入研究质量,对同质性研究采用Revman5.0软件进行统计分析。结果:纳入11个随机对照试验(包括9篇英文+2篇中文),分析结果显示:1治疗1周和2周文拉法辛组的有效性均显著高于氟西汀组[1周:RR=1.67,95%CI(1.02,2.72),P=0.04;2周:RR=1.35,95%CI(1.03,1.78),P=0.03];2治疗第6、8周后文拉法辛组与氟西汀组的有效性差异均无统计学意义[6周:RR=1.12,95%CI(1.00,1.26),P=0.05;8周:RR=1.08,95%CI(1.00,1.06),P=0.05];3在各组疗程结束后的最终治愈率,文拉法辛组与氟西汀组的治愈率性差异有统计学意义[RR=1.40,95%CI(1.17,1.66),P=0.0002]。4不良反应:文拉法辛组的恶心、口干和便秘的发生率均高于氟西汀组,差异有统计学意义。结论:文拉法辛抗抑郁症疗效优于氟西汀,两者长期治疗疗效果相当,但文拉法辛起效快于氟西汀。在不良反应中,文拉法辛更易引起恶心、口干、便秘,其余不良反应两组差异无统计学意义。
出处 《中国农村卫生事业管理》 2011年第9期977-979,共3页 Chinese Rural Health Service Administration
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Holden C. Global survey examines impact of depression[J]. science, 2000,288 (5463) : 39-40.
  • 2Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression [J]. Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1960,23 : 56-62.
  • 3Higgins JPT,Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5. 0. 2. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009. Available at: www. Cochrane -- handbook, org.
  • 4David V. Placebo- controlled inpatient comparison of venlafaxine and fluoxetine for the treatment of major depression with melancholic features [J ]. International Clinical Psychopharmacology, 2009,24 (2) : 61-85.
  • 5Jorge Costae Silva, M. D. Randomized Double- Blind Comparison of Venlafaxine and Fluoxetine in Outpatients With Major Depression [J ]. Clin Psychiatry, 1998,59 ( 7 ) : 352-357.
  • 6M. Tzanakaki. Increased remission rates with venlafaxine compared with fluoxetine in hospitalized with major depression and melancholia [J].International Clinical Psychopharmacology, 2000,15 : 29-34.
  • 7Peter H. Once-- Daily Venlafaxine Extended Release (XR) Compared With Fluoxetine in Outpatients With Depression and Anxiety[J]. Clin Psychiatry, 1999, 60(1) : 22-28.
  • 8Michel Dierick, A Double- Blind Comparison of Venlafaxine and Fluoxetine for Treatment of Major Depression in Outpatients [J]. Neuro -- Psychopharmacol and Biol. Psychiat, 1996,20: 57-71.
  • 9Richard L. A double -- blind, randomized, placebo -- controlled trial of once--daily venlafaxine extended release (XR) and uoxetine for the treatment of depression [J].Affective Disorders, 1999,56 : 171-181.
  • 10Charles B. Nemero. A double -- blind, placebo -- controlled comparison of venlafaxine and ? uoxetine treatment in depressed outpatients [J]. Psychiatric Research 2007, 41: 351-359.

二级参考文献31

  • 1袁勇贵,张石宁.文拉法辛对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗无效的抑郁症患者的疗效[J].中华精神科杂志,2005,38(1):27-29. 被引量:37
  • 2张明园.精神科量表评定手册[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1993.34.
  • 3Stahl SM. Selecting an antidepressant by using mechanism of action to enhance efficacy and avoid side effects. J Clin Psychiatry, 1998,59(suppl 18):23.
  • 4Ellen F, Robert E P, Robin B J, et al. Conceptualization and rationale for consensus definitions of terms in major depressive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 1991,48(10):851.
  • 5The World Health Report 2004. Annex Table 3 Burden of disease in DALYs by cause, sex and mortality stratum in WHO regions, estimate for 2002.
  • 6Andrew A N and Emma C W. Evolution of remission as the new standard in the treatment of depression. J Clin Psychiatry, 1999,60(suppl 2):7.
  • 7Duman RS, Heninger GR and Nestler EJ. A mlecular and cellular theory of depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 1997,54 (7):597.
  • 8Michael E T. Remission rates during treatment with venlafaxine or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitros. Br J Psychiatry, 2001, 178(99):234.
  • 9David V S. Venlafaxine entended release (XR) in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. J Clin Psychiatry, 1999,60 (Suppl) :23.
  • 10卫生部疾病控制司 中国疾病预防控制中心精神卫生中心 中华医学会精神病学分会.中国抑郁障碍防治指南(试行)[Z].北京,2003.27-54.

共引文献18

同被引文献16

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部