期刊文献+

生物膜定量分析仪对不同细菌早期生物膜形成能力的比较研究 被引量:3

Comparison of early formation of biofilm in different bacterial strains by biofilm quantitative analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过生物膜定量分析仪来观察铜绿假单胞菌(Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1),变形链球菌(Streptococcus mutans UA159)以及大肠埃希菌(Escherichia coli MG1655)生物膜形成能力的不同,并以各菌株的吸光度值A600为参考,对3种菌株早期生物膜形成能力进行比较。方法通过向生物膜培养悬液中加入与细菌直径相近的磁性小珠,利用这些小珠在磁场中受到生物膜的位移约束力的原理,采用生物膜定量分析仪,定量比较3种菌株在生物膜形成上的差别。结果实验发现铜绿假单胞菌PAO1和大肠埃希菌MG1655的细菌增长速度基本相同,但铜绿假单胞菌PAO1的生物膜形成明显快于大肠埃希菌MG1655。大肠埃希菌MG1655和变形链球菌UA159的生物膜形成速度基本相同,但大肠埃希菌MG1655的细菌增长速度明显高于变形链球菌UA159。结论不同细菌有各自的生物膜形成模式。生物膜定量分析仪作为一种高效简便的检测手段,可用于生物膜早期形成的动态分析。 Objective To compare the biofilm early formation ability of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1,Streptococcus mutans UA159 and Escherichia coli MG1655 through a biofilm quantitative analysis named BioFilm Ring Test.Method Based on th eimmobilization of magnetic beads by adherent cells,an assay was developed for the kinetic quantification of biofilm formation in this study.Result There were no significant difference between Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and Escherichia coli MG1655 in bacterial growth rate.But the biofilm formation speed of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 was much quicker than that of Escherichia coli MG1655.There were no significant difference between Escherichia coli MG1655 and Streptococcus mutans UA159 in biofilm formation speed.But the bacterial growth rate of Escherichia coli MG1655 was much higher than that of Streptococcus mutans UA159.Conclusion Each bacterial strain has its own special pattern of biofilm formation.The BioFilm Ring Test may be used as a rapid,reproducible and easy-handling method to study the kinetics of bacterial biofilm early formation.
出处 《中国微生态学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2011年第9期850-852,856,共4页 Chinese Journal of Microecology
基金 国家自然科学基金(81070826 30872886 30400497) 上海市青年科技启明星计划(09QA1403700)资助项目 上海市科学技术委员会资助(08DZ2271100) 上海市重点学科建设项目(S30206)
关键词 生物膜定量分析 变形链球菌 大肠埃希菌 铜绿假单胞菌 生物膜 Biofilm quantitative analysis Streptococccus mutans Escherichia coli Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献70

  • 1Miller MB, Bassler BL Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol, 2001, 55: 165-199.
  • 2Schauder S, Shokat K, Surette MG, et al. The LuxS family of bacterial autoinducers: biosynthesis of a novel quorum-sensing signal molecule. Mol Microbiol, 2001, 41(2) : 463-476.
  • 3Surette MG, Miller MB, Bassler BL. Quorum sensing in Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and Vibrio harveyi: a new family of genes responsible for autoinducer production. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1999, 96(4) :1639-1644.
  • 4Fong KP, Chung WO, Lamont R J, et al. Intra- and interspeeies regulation of gene expression by Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans LuxS. Infect Immun, 2001, 69 ( 12 ) :7625-7634.
  • 5Frias J, Olle E, Alsina M. Periodontal pathogens produce quorum sensing signal molecules. Infect Immun, 2001, 69 (5) : 3431- 3434.
  • 6Socransky SS, Haffajee AD. Dental biofilms: difficult therapeutic targets. Periodontol 2000, 2002, 28 : 12-55.
  • 7Marsh PD. Are dental diseases examples of ecological catastrophes? Microbiology, 2003, 149( Pt 2) : 279-294.
  • 8Chavant P, Gaillard-Martinie B, Talon R, et al. A new device for rapid evaluation of biofilm formation potential by bacteria. J Microbiol Methods, 2007, 68(3) :605-612.
  • 9Wen ZT, Burne RA. Functional genomics approach to identifying genes required for biofilm development by Streptococcus mutans. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2002,68 ( 3 ) : 1196 -1203.
  • 10Merritt J, Qi F, Goodman SD, et al. Mutation of luxS affects biofilm formation in Streptococcus mutans. Infect Immun, 2003, 71 (4) :1972-1979.

共引文献65

同被引文献17

  • 1Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms : a common cause of persistent infections [ J ]. Science, 1999,284 ( 5418 ) : 1318- 1322.
  • 2Lasa I. Towards the identification of the common features of bacterial biofilm development [ J ]. Int Mierobiol, 2006,9 ( 1 ) : 21-28.
  • 3Potera C. Forging a link between biofilm and disease [ J ]. Science, 1999,283 (5409) : 1837.
  • 4Hequet A, Humblot V, Berjeaud JM, et al. Optimized wafting of antimi- crobial peptides on stainless steel surface and biofilm resistance tests [ J ]. Colloids and Surfaces B : Biointerfaces,2011,84 (2) :301-309.
  • 5Peters LB, Wesselink PR, Moorer WR. Penetration of bacteria in bovine root dentine in vitro[ J]. Int Endod J ,2000,33( 1 ) :28-36.
  • 6Gotz F. Staphylococcus and biofilms [ J ]. Mol Microbial, 2002,43 (6) : 1367-1378.
  • 7Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms [ J ]. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2002,15 ( 2 ) : 167- 193.
  • 8Chicurel M. Bacterial biofilms and infections-Slimebusters [ J ]. Na- ture, 2001,408 ( 6810 ) :284 -286.
  • 9李青.生理盐水替代酒精皮试消毒的效果观察[J].华北煤炭医学院学报,2010,12(3):343-344. 被引量:6
  • 10陈开森,黄小林,丁露,谷晋.不同时间段临床分离MRSA生物膜形成能力的探讨[J].实验与检验医学,2011,29(1):37-38. 被引量:2

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部