期刊文献+

投标人平行串谋与最优公开保留价博弈分析 被引量:6

Game Analysis of Bidders' Parallel Collusion and the Optimal Public Reserve Price
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文将投标人平行串谋问题与招标人公开保留价定价策略相结合,研究了第二价格密封招标方式下投标串谋联盟的串谋报价及利润分配机制,分析了串谋联盟的存在对非串谋联盟中成员的投标策略和期望利润的影响,揭示了串谋联盟成员人数与串谋联盟总收益之间的关系,探讨了招标人公开保留价定价策略、串谋联盟成员人数与招标公开保留价之间的关系,指出了招标人应通过降低公开保留价的方式来防止或减少投标人平行串谋行为的发生。 From this point of bidders' parallel collusion, this paper studies the second - price sealed bidding optimal public pricing strategy. First, this paper gives the bidding price and the profit distribution mechanism of the conspiracy alliance. Second, this paper analyzes how the presence of conspiracy alliance affects the bidding strategies and the expected profit, and reveals the relationship between the number of collusion and the total revenue. Finally, this paper obtains the relationship between the number of collusion members and the optimal public reserve price, and points out that the tenders should prevent collusion by reducing the public reserve price.
出处 《经济与管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第10期77-85,共9页 Research on Economics and Management
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目"我国碳排放总量确定 指标分配 实现路径机制综合研究"(项目编号10AJY002) 北京市高等学校人才强教深化计划高层次人才资助项目"经济问题博弈分析与动态模拟研究"(项目编号PHR20100513) 北京市优秀博士学位论文指导教师人文社科项目"博弈论应用 定量分析及经济仿真研究"(项目编号YB20091003801)
关键词 招投标 平行串谋 最优公开保留价 博弈论 Bidding Parallel Collusion Optimal Public Reserve Price Game Theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1孙涵芳.Intel 16 位单片机[M].北京:北京航空航天大学出版社,2002..
  • 2张红岩,张文杰.招标采购中串谋预防方法的博弈分析[J].物流技术,2007,26(4):22-24. 被引量:6
  • 3Porter R H, Zona J D. Detection of Bid -rigging in Procurement Auctions [ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, 1993,101 (3) :518 -538.
  • 4Baldwin L H, Marshall R C, Richard J F. Bidder Collusion at Forest Serviee Timber Sales [ J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1997,105 (4) :657 -699.
  • 5Pesendorfer M. A Study of Collusion in First - price Auctions [ J ]. Review of Economic Studies ,2000,67 (3) :381 -411.
  • 6Doree A G. Collusion in the Dutch Construction Industry:An Industrial Organization Perspective [ J ]. Building Research and Information, 2004, 32(2) :146 - 156.
  • 7Klemperer P. Auctions: Theory and Practice[ M ]. Princeton University Press ,2004.
  • 8Stigler G J. Professor Stigler Revisited : Comment[ J]. Journal of Business, 1964 ( 37 ) :414.
  • 9Robinson M S. Collusion and the Choice of Auction[ J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 1985,16( 1 ) :141 -145.
  • 10Graham D A, Marshall R C. Collusive Bidder Behavior at Single - object Second - price and English Auctions [ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, 1987,95(6) :1217 - 1239.

二级参考文献23

  • 1埃尔玛·沃夫斯岱特.高级微观经济学-产业组织理论、拍卖和激励理论[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2003..
  • 2Tirole J.Hierarchies,Bureaucracies,on the role of collusion in organizations[J].Journal of Law,Economics and organization,1986,(2).
  • 3William Vickrey. Counter- speculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders [ J]. Journal of Finance, 1961.
  • 4R. B. Myerson. Optimal auction design [ J]. Mathematics of Operations Research, 1981.
  • 5J.G. Riley, W. F. Sarauelson, Optimal auction [ J]. American Economic Review, 1981.
  • 6Vickrey, William. Counterspeculation auctions and competitive sealed tenders[J] .The Journal of finance, 1961,16:8 - 37.
  • 7Roger B Myerson. Optimal Auction Design [ J ]. Mathematics of Operations Research, February 1981,6 ( 1 ) : 58 - 73.
  • 8John G, Riley, William F Samuelson. Optimal Auction [ J ]. The American Economic Review, June 1981,71 (3) : 381 - 392.
  • 9Martin Pesendorfer. A study of collusion in first-price auctions[J].Review of Economic Studies, 2000,67 : 381 - 411.
  • 10Porter RH, Zona J D. Detection of bid rigging in procurement auction [J] .Journal of Political Economy 1993, 101 (3) :518 - 538.

共引文献25

同被引文献36

  • 1鲁耀斌,张金隆,黎志成.拍卖过程中最优保留值设置的研究[J].管理工程学报,1999,13(1):47-48. 被引量:8
  • 2王平平.拍卖机制中最优保留价比较分析[J].科技和产业,2004,4(12):20-22. 被引量:10
  • 3徐雅卿,魏轶华,胡奇英.逆向拍卖保留价建模及数值分析[J].西安电子科技大学学报,2007,34(3):468-471. 被引量:5
  • 4王文举 杨颖梅.密封招标最优报价博弈分析.数量经济研究,2010,1.
  • 5Ariely D. and Simonson I. , 2003, Buying, Bidding, Playing, or Competing? Value Assessment and Decision Dynamics in Online Auctions [-J:, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13 (1:2), 113:123.
  • 6Haubl G. , Peter T. L. , PopRowsRi Leszczyc, Z003, Wlzmrnum l:rzces anct Vrocluct Vatuatzons zn Auctions [J].Marketing Science Institute Report, 3 (03:117), 115:141.
  • 7Kahneman Danie I and Amos Tversky, 1979, Prospect Theory An Analysis of Decision Under Risk [J]. Econometrica, 2 (47), 263:292.
  • 8Kamins, Michael A. , Xavier Dr6ze and Valerie S Folkes, 2004, A Field Study of the Effects of Minimum and Reserve Prices on Internet Auctions [J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 4 (30), 622:628.
  • 9Khoroshilov Y. and Dodonova A. , 2004, Anchoring and Transaction Utility. Evidence from On- line Auctions [J]. Applied Economics Letters, 11, 307:310.
  • 10Matthew Rabin, 2002, A Perspective on Psychology and Economics EJ:, European Economic Re- view, 46 (4:5), 657:685.

引证文献6

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部