期刊文献+

基于规范及实测风谱的苏通大桥抖振响应对比研究 被引量:4

Comparable study of the buffeting response of Sutong Bridge based on specification and measured wind power spectrum
下载PDF
导出
摘要 复核结构设计是桥梁结构健康监测系统的主要功能之一。以世界第一大跨斜拉桥——苏通大桥为工程背景,采用实测风谱对大桥设计阶段基于规范谱所进行的抖振分析进行验证。首先采用非线性最小二乘法对桥址区实测强风紊流功率谱密度函数进行拟合,获得实测谱曲线,并分别以该实测拟合谱和规范谱为目标谱分别模拟桥址区三维脉动风场。然后采用上述两种风场,基于ANSYS对苏通大桥进行非线性时域抖振响应分析。两种分析结果的对比表明:与实测谱相比,基于规范谱所得的主梁抖振响应情况不一,但主塔抖振响应均偏于保守;两种抖振响应的PSD曲线整体趋势基本一致。分析结果可为该桥的风致抖振性能评价提供研究信息,同时对其他类型结构的抗风设计具有重要的参考价值。 Verifying the structural design is one of the major objectives of Structural Health Monitoring System (SHMS) of bridges. Sutong Bridge ( SB), the longest cable-stayed bridge in the world is taken as an example, and the buffeting analysis results using the bridge design specifications is verified by using the measured wind turbulence power spectral density (PSD) function. The measured wind spectrum obtained from strong winds records of the SB site is fitted by using the nonlinear least-squares method, and the three-dimensional turbulence wind fields of the bridge site are simulated by using the measured and specification spectra, respectively. Then, nonlinear time-domain buffeting response analysis of SB is conducted using ANSYS. Comparison of the analysis results shows that, comparing with the one from using the measured spectrum, the buffeting response of the deck derived from the specification spectrum is variable, but the buffeting response of the main tower is inclined to be more conservative. The overall trends of the two types of buffeting response PSDs are basically similar.
出处 《土木工程学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第10期91-97,共7页 China Civil Engineering Journal
基金 国家杰出青年基金(50725828) 国家自然科学基金(50978056 50908046) 国家教育部博士点基金(200802861012) 东南大学高校基本科研业务费项目(3205001101 Seucx201106) 湖南大学风工程与桥梁工程湖南省重点实验室开放基金
关键词 斜拉桥 抖振性能 Kaimal谱 Panofsky谱 实测风谱 时域分析 结构健康监测 cable-stayed bridges buffeting performance Kaimal spectrum Panofsky spectrum measured wind spectrum time-domain analysis structural health monitoring
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1李惠,欧进萍.斜拉桥结构健康监测系统的设计与实现(I):系统设计[J].土木工程学报,2006,39(4):39-44. 被引量:67
  • 2Ko J M, Ni Y Q, Chan T H T. Feasibility of damage detection of Tsing Ma Bridge using vibration measurements [ C ]//Proceedings of SPIE. California, USA, 2000.
  • 3Hui M C, Larsen A, Xiang H F. Wind turbulence characteristics study at the Stonecutters Bridge site part I--mean wind and turbulence intensities [ J ]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2009,97 (1) :22-36.
  • 4李爱群,王浩,谢以顺.基于SHMS的润扬悬索桥桥址区强风特性[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2007,37(3):508-511. 被引量:23
  • 5Hua X G, Ni Y Q, Ko J M. Modeling of temperature- frequency correlation using combined principal component analysis and support vector regression technique [ J ]. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, 2007, 21 (2) : 122-135.
  • 6Xu Y L, Zhu L D. Buffeting response of long-span cablesupported bridges under skew winds. Part 2: case study [ J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2005,281 (3/4/5) : 675-697.
  • 7谢静.基于现场实测的大跨度斜拉桥非线性时域抖振响应分析[D].南京:东南大学,2010.
  • 8Deodatis G. Simulation of ergodic muhivaritae stochastic processes [ J ]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 1996,122(8) :778-787.
  • 9Simiu E, Scanlan R H. Wind effects on structures [ M ]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1996.
  • 10王浩,李爱群.斜风作用下大跨度桥梁抖振响应时域分析(I):分析方法[J].土木工程学报,2009,42(10):74-80. 被引量:10

二级参考文献28

  • 1杨咏漪,廖海黎,李永乐.基于ANSYS的斜拉桥抖振时域实用分析方法[J].空气动力学学报,2004,22(4):457-460. 被引量:10
  • 2陈艾荣,王毅.基于小波方法的随机脉动风模拟[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2005,33(4):427-431. 被引量:19
  • 3李立,郑忠双,廖锦翔,李亮.基于时频混合格式的桥梁抖振响应计算方法[J].中国公路学报,2005,18(3):70-74. 被引量:1
  • 4王浩,李爱群,缪长青.Finite element model updating and validating of Runyang Suspension Bridge based on SHMS[J].Journal of Southeast University(English Edition),2005,21(4):474-479. 被引量:7
  • 5Simiu E, Scanlan R H. Wind effects on structures [ M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1996.
  • 6Scanlan R H. The action of flexible bridges under wind, Part 2: buffeting theory [ J ]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1978, 60(2) :201-211.
  • 7Xu Y L, Sun D K, Ko J M, et al. Fully coupled buffeting analysis of Tsing Ma suspension bridge [ J ]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2000, 85 (1): 97-117.
  • 8Katsucbi H, Jones N P, Scanlan R H. Muhimode coupled flutter and buffeting analysis of the Akashi-kaikyo bridge [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1999, 125 (1): 60 -70.
  • 9Boonyapinyo V, Miyata T, Yamada H. Advanced aerodynamic analysis of suspension bridges by stat-space approach [ J ]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1999, 125(12):1357-1365.
  • 10Kovacs L, Svensson H S, Jordet E. Analytical aerodynamic investigation of cable-stayed Helgeland bridge [ J ]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1992, 118 ( 1 ) : 147-168.

共引文献96

同被引文献39

引证文献4

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部