期刊文献+

基于改进重要度绩效分析法的服务属性决策 被引量:2

Service Attribute Decision Making Based on Revised Importance Performance Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为充分把握顾客评估时的个性化差异及主观不确定性,采用多粒度多语义模糊数表达服务属性绩效值,通过转换函数将其转化为统一的决策信息;考虑到服务属性重要度之间的相互关系对决策结果的影响,采用网络层次分析法确定服务属性重要度,进而形成改进的重要度绩效分析法,以有效确定服务属性改进的优先度;同时,以水平定向钻机的维修服务为实例,验证了所提出的方法的可行性与有效性.结果表明:所提出的改进重要度绩效分析法的分析结果符合客观实际,能够更好地指导企业决策. In order to represent the individuation difference and subjective uncertainty in customer evaluation adequately,multi-granularity and multi-semantic fuzzy number which is translated into uniform decision information by conversion function was adopted to express service attribute's performance value.Considering the affection to decision result arisen from the connection relations between importance degree of service attribute,analytic network process was adopted to identify the service attribute importance degree;consequently a revised importance performance analysis came into being to determine the priority in service attribute's improvement effectively.A maintenance service of horizontal directional drilling machine was given to demonstrate the efficiency and feasibility of the revised method.The results show that the revised importance performance analysis is consistent with objective situation,which can be used to better guide business decisions.
出处 《上海交通大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第9期1281-1287,共7页 Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51075261) 上海市科技创新行动计划项目(09dz1124600 10dz1121600) 上海交通大学研究生创新能力培养专项基金项目
关键词 服务属性 重要度绩效分析 网络层次分析法 service attribute importance performance analysis(IPA) analytic network process
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Deng Weijaw. Fuzzy importanceperformance analysis for determining critical service attributes[J]. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 2008, 19 (2): 252270.
  • 2Ostrom A, Iacobucci D. Consumer tradeoffs and the evaluation of services[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1995, 59(1): 1728.
  • 3Danaher P J. Using conjoint analysis to determine the relative importance of service attributes measured in customer satisfaction surveys[J]. Journal of Retailing, 1997, 73(2): 235260.
  • 4Matzler K, Sauerwein E. The factor structure of customer satisfaction: An empirical test of the importance grid and the penaltyrewardcontrast analysis[J]. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 2002, 13(4): 314332.
  • 5Matzler K, Fuchs M, Schubert A K. Employee satisfaction: Does Kano’s model apply?[J]. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 2004, 15(9/10): 11791198.
  • 6Oh H. Revisiting importanceperformance analysis[J]. Tourism Management, 2001, 22(6):617627.
  • 7Matzler K, Bailom F, Hinterhuber, et al. The asymmetric relationship between attributelevel performance and overall customer satisfaction: A reconsideration of the importanceperformance analysis[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2004, 33(4): 271277.
  • 8张在房,褚学宁,程辉.基于模糊加权最小二乘的多粒度语言决策信息集成[J].上海交通大学学报,2009,43(9):1377-1382. 被引量:2
  • 9Herreraa F, HerreraViedmaa E, Martinez L. A fusion approach for managing multigranularity linguistic term sets in decision making[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1998, 114(1):4358.
  • 10杨明顺,林志航,陈琨.模糊质量功能配置中多粒度多语义语言信息的处理[J].信息与控制,2003,32(1):9-13. 被引量:4

二级参考文献13

  • 1姜艳萍,樊治平.基于不同粒度语言判断矩阵的群决策方法[J].系统工程学报,2006,21(3):249-253. 被引量:46
  • 2Buyukozkan G, Feyzioglu O, Ruan D. Fuzzy group decision-making to multiple preference formats in quality function deployment [J]. Computers in Industry, 2007, 58(5): 392-402.
  • 3Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Martinez L. A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision-making [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 114(1): 43-58.
  • 4Herrera F, Martinez L. A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranularity hierarchical linguistic contexts in multiexpert decision-making[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Part B, 2001, 31(2):227-234.
  • 5Sanchez P J, Perez L G, Mata F, et al. A multi- granular linguistic model to evaluate the suitability of installing an ERP system [J]. Mathware & Soft Com- puting, 2005, 12(2-3): 217-233.
  • 6Jiang Y P, Fan Z P, Ma J. A method for group decision making in multi-granularity linguistic assessment information[J]. Information Sciences, 2008, 178(4) : 1098-1109.
  • 7Chen L H, Weng M C. An evaluation approach to engineering design in QFD process using fuzzy goal programming models [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 172(]): 230-248.
  • 8Kreng V B, Wu C Y. Evaluation of knowledge portal development tools using a fuzzy AHP approach: the case of Taiwan Residents stone industry [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 176(3): 1795-1810.
  • 9Bordogna G, Fedrizzi M, Pasi G. A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators [J]. IEEE T Syst Man CY A, 1997, 27(1) :126-132.
  • 10Olcer A I, Odabagi A Y. A new fuzzy multiple attributive group decision making methodology and its application to propulsion/manoeuvring system selection problem [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 166(1): 93-114.

共引文献4

同被引文献23

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部