期刊文献+

用于辩证分析的多Agent辩论对话系统MAS-Arguing的设计与实现 被引量:2

Design and Implementation of Multi-agent Argumentation Dialogues System MAS-arguing for Dialectic Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 多方对话博弈是当前多Agent辩论技术研究的难点.本文基于辩论理论的辩证语义,提出一种用于多方论据博弈的辩证分析模型DAM-MAG,并设计和实现了基于该模型的多Agent辩论对话系统MAS-Arguing,证明了DAM-MAG模型在技术上的可行性.为了多方对话博弈易于实现,MAS-Arguing引入辩论擂台管理Agent,负责协调和监控多个辩论Agent之间的角色转换和论据博弈.本文主要从体系结构、通信语言、多方对话协议和承诺规则等方面说明了MAS-Arguing系统的设计与实现. A multi-party dialogue games is an intractable problem in the present study of multi-agent argumentation.This paper proposes a Dialectic Analysis Model for Multilateral Argument Games which is called DAM-MAG,based on the dialectic semantics of argumentation theory.A multi-Agent argumentation dialogues system,called MAS-Arguing,has been designed and implemented based on this DAM-MAG,which testifies the feasibility of DAM-MAG in technology.In order to realize the multi-party dialogue games easily,Argumentation Arena Manager Agent is introduced into MAS-Arguing,which is in charge of coordinating and monitoring the role′s transforming and argument games among the Argumentative Agents.From the aspects of architecture,communication language,multi-party dialogue protocols,and commitment rules,the design and implementation of MAS-Arguing are illustrated in this paper.
出处 《小型微型计算机系统》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第10期2109-2113,共5页 Journal of Chinese Computer Systems
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70971134 90716015)资助
关键词 辩论 对话博弈 多AGENT系统 辩证语义 辩证分析模型 argumentation dialogue game multi-agent systems dialectic semantics dialectical analysis model
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Jakobovits H, Vcrmeir D. Dialectic semantics for argumentation frameworks[C]. In: Proc. 7th [ICAI, 1999: 53-62.
  • 2Dung P M. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in non-monotonic reasoning, logic programming, and N-per- son games[ J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1995,77 ( 1 ) :321-357.
  • 3Cayrol C, Doutre S, Mengin J. On decision problems related to pre- ferred semantics a of argumentation frameworks[J]. Logic Corn- put,2003,13(3) :377-403.
  • 4Vreeswijk G.Prakken H: Credulous mid skeptical argument games for preferred semantics[ C]. In: Proceedings of/ELIA'2000, The 7th European Workshop on Logic for Artificial Intelligence, Berlin, 2000:224-238.
  • 5Bench-Capon T J M, Dunne P E. Argumentation in artificial intelli- gence[ J]. Artificial Intelligence,2007,171 ( 1 ) : 114-159.
  • 6Peter McBurney, Simon Parsons. Dialogue games for agent argu- mentation[C]. In Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, Rah- wan I,Simari G R,Springer-Verlag Media,2009:261-280.
  • 7Dunne P E, Bench-Capon T J M. Two party immediate response disputes: properties and efficiency [ J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2003,149( 1 ) :221-250.
  • 8Yao Li, Zhang Wei-ming. InteUigent and cooperative information systems technology [ M ]. Beijing: Publish House of Electronics Industry, 2002.
  • 9JADE. Java agent development framework [ EB/OL ]. http ://jade. tilab, com.2007.
  • 10FIPA. Agent communication language(FIPA 97, Version 1.0 Part 2) [ EB/OL]. http://www, fipa. org/, Geneva, Switzerland, 1997.

同被引文献17

  • 1Greco M S. Argumentation in dispute mediation:a reasonable way to handle conflict[M].Amsterdam,Philadelphia:John Benjamins Pub.Company,2011.
  • 2Alexy R. A theory of legal argumentation:the theory of rational discourse as theory of legal justification[M].Oxford England;New York:Oxford University Press,2010.
  • 3Toulmin S E. The Uses of Argument[M].The Edinburgh Building,Cambridge,United Kingdom:Cambridge University Press,2003.
  • 4Baroni P,Caminada M,Giacomin M. An introduction to argumentation semantics[J].{H}KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING REVIEW,2011,(4):365-410.
  • 5Bryant D,Krause P J,Vreeswijk G A W. Argue tuProlog:A lightweight argumentation engine for agent applications[J].Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications,2006.27.
  • 6Rahwan I,Banihashemi B. Arguments in OWL:A progress report[J].Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications,2008.297.
  • 7Munoz A,Botía J A. ASBO:Argumentation system based on ontologies[A].Berlin Heiddberg:Springer,2008.191-205.
  • 8Prakken H. An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments[J].Argument and Computation,2010,(2):93-124.
  • 9Vreeswijk G A W. Abstract argumentation systems[J].{H}Artificial Intelligence,1997,(1):225-279.
  • 10Martlnez D C,Garcla A J,Simari G R. Modelling well-structured argumentation lines[A].2007.465-470.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部