期刊文献+

如何在司法改革中兼顾公平、正义与成本——以律师收费制度为视角 被引量:1

How to Balance Equality,Justice and Cost in Judicial Reform:From the Perspective of the Legal Fee System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 司法的总体目标是实现公平与正义,然而,在我国有限的司法资源条件下,司法制度设计不得不考虑公平与正义的成本。司法成本过高会成为司法可及性的障碍。如何平衡公平、正义与成本,于是成为了制度设计的重点和难点之一。从律师收费制度的视角,应用法经济学的方法,通过建立诉讼的动态博弈模型,定量比较和分析了我国当前的各种律师收费制度对公平、正义和司法成本的影响;并通过数据模拟,探讨了律师收费制度设计中应注意解决和避免的问题,这为司法制度的设计提供了分析思路。结论也进一步修正了前期理论研究成果,从而解决了律师收费研究中理论推理与实证结论不一致的问题。 To achieve equality and justice is the main objective of China's judicial reform.However,due to the scarcity of judicial resources in China,the cost of achieving equality and justice must be considered when designing the judicial system.Thus,how to balance equality,justice and judicial costs has become one of the most complicated questions.Analysis of the legal fee system provides a unique perspective for this question.In this paper,we use the method of law and economics to analyze this question.Through setting up a dynamic game model for litigation,we compare the effects of different legal fee systems on equality,justice and the social cost.Through data simulation,our theoretical findings are interpreted intuitively.The paper also scrutinizes institutional factors in system designing,which provides useful implications for the judicial reform.In addition,our research findings have amended the inconsistence of results between theoretical reasoning and empirical evidence.
作者 乔岳
出处 《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期8-17,共10页 Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 法经济学 司法改革 律师收费 诉讼 动态博弈 law and economics judicial reform legal fee litigation dynamic game
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Eric Helland & Alexander Tabarrok, "Contingency fees, settlement delay, and low-quality litigation: Empirical evidence from two data- base. ", Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Vol 19, No. 2 (Oct 2003) , 517-542.
  • 2Richard Posner, Economic Analysis of Law, New York: Aspen Law and Business', 1998.
  • 3Hugh Gravelle & Michael Waterson, "No win, no fee: Some economics of contingent legal fees", The Economic Journal, Vol 103, No. 103 (Sept 1993), 1205-1220.
  • 4Joe Halpern & Stuart Turnbull, "Legal fees contracts and alternative cost rules: An economic analysis", International Review of Law and E- conomics, Vol 3, No. 1 (June 1983 ), 3-26.
  • 5廖永安,刘方勇.潜在的冲突与对立:诉讼费用制度与周边制度关系考[J].中国法学,2006(2):133-145. 被引量:13
  • 6Ivan P' ng, "Strategic behaviour in suit, settlement, and trial", Bell Journal of Economics, Vol 14, No. 2 ( Autumn 1983 ) , 539 -550.
  • 7Herbert Kritzer, The Justice Broker: Lawyers and Ordinary Litigation, Oxford University Press, 1990.
  • 8郁光华.《法律与公共政策问题研究--郁光华法律和经济论文选》,北京:中国社会科学出版社,2004年,第111-115页.
  • 9Mitchell Polinsky & Daniel Rubinfeld (2003), "Aligning the interests of lawyers and clients", American Law and Economic Review, Vol 5, No. 1 (2003), 165-185.
  • 10范愉.小额诉讼程序研究[J].中国社会科学,2001(3):141-153. 被引量:191

二级参考文献44

共引文献237

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部