期刊文献+

论类型逻辑语法对蒙太古语法的继承与发展 被引量:2

Type-Logical Grammar:the Inheritance and Development of Montague Grammar
下载PDF
导出
摘要 蒙太古语法和类型逻辑语法的内部构造和运行方式大致相同,类型逻辑语法最重要的发展在于更严格地贯彻了组合性原则,原因是它采用的范畴语法达到了兰贝克演算的生成能力,高阶内涵逻辑增加了多形态并列组合器等手段。对名词短语的处理凸显了二者的异同。 The most significant measure of the evolvement from Montague grammar to type-logical grammar is a more thorough application of the principle of compositionality.It is realized through the employment of Lambek calculus on the one hand and through such devices as polymorphic coordination combinators on the other.Their similarities and dissimilarities are highlighted through the treatment of noun phrases.
作者 王欣
出处 《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期146-150,共5页 Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 蒙太古语法 类型逻辑语法 组合性原则 兰贝克演算 多形态并列组合器 Montague grammar type-logical grammar principle of compositionality Lambek calculus polymorphic coordination combinator
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Montague, R. , "The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English", in J. Hintikka, J. Moravesik, and P. Suppes (eds.) Ap- proaches to Natural L nauge, Dordreeht : Reidel, 1973, pp. 221-242.
  • 2Carpenter, B. , Type-Logical Semantics, Cambridge: the MIT press, 1997.
  • 3邹崇理.《逻辑、语言和信息--逻辑语法研究》,北京:人民出版社,2002年.
  • 4邹崇理.《范畴类型逻辑》,北京:中国社会科学出版社,2008年.
  • 5张秋成.《类型逻辑语法研究》,北京:中国人民大学出版社.
  • 6Bach, E. , Informal Lectures on Formal Semantics, SUNY series in linguistics, Albany, N. Y. : State University of New York Press, 1989, p. 48.
  • 7Carpenter, B. , Type-Logical Semantics, p. 437.
  • 8Dowty, D., Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979, p. 11.
  • 9Partee, B. , "Noun phrase interpretation and type - shifting principles", in P. Portner and B. Partee ( eds. ) Formal Semantics : the Essential Readings, Blackwell, 2002, pp. 357-381.
  • 10Dowty, D. , "Compositionality as an empirical problem", p. 65.

同被引文献13

  • 1方立.《蒙太古语义学导论》评介[J].外语教学与研究,1986,18(3):12-24. 被引量:5
  • 2姚亚平.“是”字詞性辨[J].南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),1981,12(4):82-91. 被引量:4
  • 3李健.谈由“是”构成的判断句的基本形式及其逻辑意义[J].东疆学刊,1987,4(4):61-64. 被引量:3
  • 4冯志伟.范畴语法[J].语言文字应用,2001(3):100-110. 被引量:10
  • 5Morris M. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2007 :22.
  • 6GamutL T F. Logic,Language,and Meaning [ M]. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press, 1991:140.
  • 7Dowty D. Compositionality as an Empirical Problem [ M]//Barker C,Jacobson P. Direct Compositionality. Oxford : Ox-ford University Press,2007:23 - 101.
  • 8Montague R. English as a Formal Language [ M] //Thoma-son R H. Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of RichardMontague. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974: 108 -221.
  • 9Dowty D, Wall R,Peters S. Introduction to Montague Se-mantics [M]. Dordrecht:Reidel,1981 : 154.
  • 10Church A. A Formulation of a Simple Theory of Types [ J].Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1940 (5) :56 -68.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部