期刊文献+

认知语言学视阈下的转喻研究 被引量:2

On the Study of Metonymy from Cognitive Linguistics Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 认知语言学为转喻的研究提供了一个全新的视角。转喻不仅仅是一种语言层面上的修辞手段,更是一种概念现象和认知过程。近年来转喻的界定、分类、转喻与隐喻的相互关系以及转喻与语言结构的关系成为该领域的研究热点。对其简要的梳理对我们明确未来的研究方向意义重大。 Cognitive Linguistics provides a new perspective for the study of metonymy.Metonymy is not just a figure of speech;it is also viewed as a conceptual phenomenon and a cognitive process.In recent years the definition and classification of metonymy,the relationship between metonymy and metaphor and the relationship between metonymy and grammatical structure have become the hot issues in the field of metonymy studies.A brief outline of the recent studies will be of great significance to the future research orientation.
作者 解芳 崔林
出处 《辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 2011年第5期105-108,共4页 Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 认知语言学 转喻 分类 转喻与隐喻的相互关系 语法转喻 cognitive linguistics metonymy classification the relationship between metonymy and metaphor grammatical metonymy
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphors We Live by [M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  • 2Taylor J R. Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistie Theory [M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.
  • 3Langacker R W. Reference-point Constructions [J]. Cognitive Linguistics 1993(4) : 1-38.
  • 4Croft W, The Role of Domains in the Interpretation of Metaphors and Metonymies [J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1993 (4) : 335-370.
  • 5Radden G, Kovecses Z. Towards a Theory of Metonymy[M]// Klaus-Uwe Panther, Radden G, Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam:John Benjamins, 1999 : 17-59.
  • 6Ruiz de Mendoza. The Role of Mappings and Domains in Understanding Metonymy[M]//Barcelona A Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. Berlin /New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000: 109-132.
  • 7Jakobson R. The Metaphoric and Metonymie Poles[M]//Ren'e Dirven, Ralf Porings. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, 2002: 41-47. Berlin &. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 8曾庆敏.从认知角度看隐喻和转喻的功能差异[J].西南政法大学学报,2005,7(5):131-134. 被引量:10
  • 9Fauconnier G. Generalized Integration Networks[M]//Vyvyan Evans, St, ephanie Pourcel. New Directions in Cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2009:147-160.
  • 10Panther K, Thornburg L. A Cognitive Approach to Infereneing in Conversation[J]. Journal of Pragmatics,1998(30) :755-69.

二级参考文献7

  • 1刘正光.论转喻与隐喻的连续体关系[J].现代外语,2002,25(1):61-70. 被引量:111
  • 2[2]Aristotle. Rhetoric and Poetics [ M ]. New York: The Modern Library. 1954.25.
  • 3[3][7]Ullmann, S. Semantics: An Introduction to the Science of Meaning [ M ]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 1962. 215.223.
  • 4[5]Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live by[ M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1980.4.
  • 5[8]Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor[ M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1989. 103.
  • 6Geoffrey Nunberg. The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: Polysemy[J] 1979,Linguistics and Philosophy(2):143~184
  • 7董成如.转喻的认知解释[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2004,27(2):6-9. 被引量:125

共引文献30

同被引文献15

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部