期刊文献+

术中超声检查在急诊胆囊切除术中预防胆总管残余结石的临床价值 被引量:1

Value of intra-operative ultrasonography in prevention of retained calculus in common bile duct before emergency cholecysctomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨急诊胆囊切除术患者手术前可疑胆总管结石术中超声检查的临床价值。方法对本院2006年12月~2010年10月32例术前可疑胆总管结石的急诊胆囊切除术患者行术中超声检查,对其结果进行分析。结果32例经术中超声检查,发现胆总管结石20例,均经手术胆总管切开探测证实。超声检查阴性者,均未行胆总管切开探测,术后1例出现疑似胆总管残余结石表现,经保守治疗而与愈。结论对急诊胆囊切除术患者手术前可疑胆总管结石者,行术中超声检查,有助于提高胆总管切开探测阳性率,减少不必要的胆总管切开探测。 Objective To evaluate the value of intra-operative ultrasonography for suspected choledocholithiasis before emergency cholecysctomy.Methods From December 2006 to October 2010,32 symptomatic gallstones patients underwent intra-operative ultrasonography for suspected choledocholithiasis before emergency cholecysctomy.The results were analyzed.Results Of the 32 symptomatic gallstones patients,occult common bile duct stone(CBDS) was found in 20 patients.The results were proved by exploratory choledochostomy.Those in whom no signs of occult CBDS were found did not undergo exploratory choledochostomy.One had symptoms and signs of retained calculus in common bile duct after the operation,but recovered after non-operative therapy.Conclusion For suspected choledocholithiasis before emergency cholecysctomy,intra-operative ultrasonography can increase the positive rate of exploratory choledochostomy,and avoid unnecessary exploratory choledochostomy.
出处 《淮海医药》 CAS 2011年第6期487-488,共2页 Journal of Huaihai Medicine
关键词 胆囊切除术 超声检查 结石 胆道外科手术 Cholecysctomy Ultrasonography Calculi Biliary tract surgical procedures
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献16

  • 1Okada M, Fukada J,Toya K, et al. The value of drip infusion cholangiography using multidetector-row helical CT in patients with choledocholithiasis[J]. Eur Radiol, 2005,15(10):2140-2145.
  • 2Williams EJ, Green J, Beckingham I, et al. Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS) [J]. Gut, 2008, 57(7): 1004-1021.
  • 3Topal B, Van de Moortel M, Fieuws S, et al. The value of MRCP in predieling CBD stones in patients with gallstone disease [J]. Br J Surg, 2003,90(1):42-47.
  • 4Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P, et al. Are we meeting the slandards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangie-pancreatograph practice[ J ]. Gul, 2007,56(6):821-829.
  • 5Mehta SN, Reinhold C, Barkun AN. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N AM,1997,7(2) :247.
  • 6Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Clin Radiol,2000,55 (1) :25.
  • 7Liu TH, Consorti ET, Kawashima A, et al. Patient evaluation and management with selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatagraphy before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg,2001,234( 1 ) :33.
  • 8Tanaka M,Sada M,Eguchi T,et al. Comparison of routine and selective endoscopic retrograde cholandiography before cholecystectomy.World J Surg,1996,20(3) :267.
  • 9Boraschi P, Neri E, Braccini G, et al. Choledocolithiasis: diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography. Three-year experience.Magn Reson Imaging,1999,7(9) :1245.
  • 10Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Gapps GW,et al. Half-fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects. Radiology,1998,207( 1 ) :21.

共引文献36

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部