期刊文献+

澳大利亚ISLPR框架下职业英语能力测试模式及开发与启示 被引量:1

The Study of EOP Ability Assessment Mode under the Frame of ISLPR in Australia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 职业英语课程的发展需要建立专门的测试体系,目的在于评价学生在特定岗位中运用英语完成特定工作任务的能力,而现有的通用英语的测试模式无法全面评价学生的职业英语能力。澳大利亚ISLPR语言能力量表及其测试是基于交际能力理论基础上的测试体系,并为语言能力测试提供了专门用途模式,它所具备的真实性和职业性符合职业英语能力测试的要求。本文通过研究ISLPR的设计原理和具体的测试设计,为构建适合职业英语课程的测试模式提供可行的措施和方法。 A specific assessment should be established with the development of EOP course, whose purpose is to evaluate the learner's language ability during specific work process, because the testing ways in existence couldn't meet this kind of need. The ISLPR and its testing in Australia are based on the theory of communicative ability,which provide testing mode for special purpose. Most important of all, the authenticity and occupational preference in the testing accord with the requirement of the EOP ability assessment. The focus of this paper is on the design principle and procedure in ISLPR,which can give some useful tips for the assessment mode in EOP course.
作者 韦鸿发
出处 《高教论坛》 2011年第11期126-129,共4页 higher education forum
关键词 职业英语 国际第二语言能力量表(ISLPR) 测试模式 EOP (English for Occupational Purpose) ISLPR (International Second Language Proficiency Ratings) assessment mode
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Names and Brief Summaries of ISLPR Levels. http://www. islpr, org/ScaleLevels, html. (EB/OL3 . 2011 - 06 -27.
  • 2孔文,张守进,李清华.发展中的语言行为测试——国外研究综述[J].现代外语,2007,30(2):200-208. 被引量:15
  • 3MCNAMARA, T, F. Measuring Second Language Performance [M]. London: Longman, 1996.
  • 4SKEHAN,P. A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning [M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1998.

二级参考文献36

  • 1吴红云,刘润清.写作元认知结构方程模型研究[J].现代外语,2004,27(4):370-377. 被引量:92
  • 2刘建达.话语填充测试方法的多层面Rasch模型分析[J].现代外语,2005,28(2):157-169. 被引量:46
  • 3韩宝成.结构方程模型及其在语言测试中的应用[J].现代外语,2006,29(1):78-86. 被引量:34
  • 4McNamara, T. F. & T. Lumley. 1997. The effect of interlocutor and assessment mode variables in overseas assessments of speaking skills in occupational settings[J]. Language Testing 14, 2 : 140-56.
  • 5McNamara, T. F. 1997. Interaction in second language performance assessment: Whose performance? [J]. Applied Linguistics 18, 4: 446-66.
  • 6Messick, S. 1994. The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments[J]. Educational Researcher 23, 2 : 13-23.
  • 7Messick, S. 1995. Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment[J]. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 14, 4: 5-8.
  • 8Myford, C. M. & E measuring rater measurement Measurement 4, W. Wolfe. 2003. Detecting and effects using many-facet Rasch [J]. Journal of Applied 4 : 386-422.
  • 9Norris, J. M., J. D. Brown, T. Hudsonand & J.Yoshioka. 1998. Designing Second Language Performance Assessments[M]. Honolulu : University of Hawaii at Manoa.
  • 10Purpura, J. E. 1998. Investigating the effects of strategy use and second language test performance with high-and low-ability groups: A structural equation modeling approach [J]. Language Testing 15, 3: 333-79.

共引文献14

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部