期刊文献+

保护层分析中独立保护层的识别研究 被引量:19

Study on Identification of Independent Protection Layers in Layer of Protection Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为阐述保护层分析(LOPA)中独立保护层(IPL)的识别规则,以及这些规则在实际应用中要注意的问题,以生产聚氯乙烯(PVC)的间歇聚合反应为例,对8个不同的LOPA场景进行分析,给出不同场景的IPL和要求时的失效概率(PFD),以及建议增加的IPL。分析结果表明,在进行IPL的识别时,应重点确认IPL的有效性和独立性。在评估IPL有效性时,应关注具有共同元件的IPL,IPL的行动能力、人员行动有效性及IPL的PFD等。在评估独立性时,应确保IPL独立于初始事件和同一场景中的其他IPL的任何构成元件。通过分析,发现PVC工艺中安全阀(PSV)设计、安全仪表功能(SIF)设计和人员行动等IPL中存在的问题,并提出相应的建议。 In order to investigate the rules which are used to identify the IPL in LOPA and the problems that should be paid attention to when these rules were applied,this paper analyzed eight different LOPA scenarios in a batch polymerization of polyvinyl chloride(PVC) production.The IPLs and their PFD of different scenarios were provided.The IPLs that should be added were suggested too.The results show that the effectiveness and independence of IPL should be confirmed when identify the IPL.The IPL with common components,the IPL's action ability,the effectiveness of human action and IPL's PFD should be focused when assessing the effectiveness of IPL.When the independence of IPL is assessed,the IPL independent of the initiating event and the components of any other IPL already claimed for the same scenario should be assured.The problems which exist in pressure safety valve(PSV),safety instrumented function(SIF) system design and human action IPLs were discovered,and corresponding solutions were proposed.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第7期74-78,共5页 China Safety Science Journal
关键词 保护层分析(LOPA) 独立保护层(IPL) 场景 有效性 独立性 要求时失效概率(PFD) layer of protection analysis(LOPA) independent protection layer(IPL) scenario effectiveness independence probability of failure on demand(PFD)
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Dowell A M. Layer of protection analysis for determining safety integrity level[J]. ISA Transactions, 1998,37(3) :155 - 165.
  • 2Wei C Y, Rogers W J, Mannan M S. Layer of proction analysis for reactive chemical risk assessment[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials ,2008,159( 1 ) : 19 - 24.
  • 3Gowland R. The accidental risk assessment methodology for industries (ARAMIS)/layer of protection analysis (LOPA) methodology: A step forward towards convergent practices in risk assessment?[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2006,130(3) :307 - 310.
  • 4CCPS. Layer of Protection Analysis-Simplified Process Risk Assessment[M]. New York: Wiley,2001.
  • 5Summers A E. Introduction to layers of proction analysis[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials ,2003,104(1-3): 163 -168.
  • 6周荣义,李石林,刘何清.HAZOP分析中LOPA的应用研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2010,20(7):76-81. 被引量:74
  • 7管杰,廖海燕.保护层分析(LOPA)在炼化生产中的应用[J].安全、健康和环境,2010,10(1):36-38. 被引量:32
  • 8魏华.安全设计的保护层分析在600kt/a甲醇项目中的应用[J].石油化工自动化,2008,44(6):24-27. 被引量:6
  • 9白永忠,李奇,姜巍巍,吴重光.过程工业计算机辅助安全防护层分析技术进展[J].中国安全科学学报,2008,18(12):154-160. 被引量:11
  • 10CCPS. Guidelines for Pressure Relief and Effluent Handling Systems[M]. New York:Wiley, 1998.

二级参考文献26

共引文献103

同被引文献98

  • 1张文祥.从人、物、环境着手控制安全隐患[J].电力安全技术,2004,6(4). 被引量:4
  • 2魏东,赵大林,薛岗,田亮.油罐火灾燃烧速度的动态变化特性[J].消防技术与产品信息,2005,18(1):33-37. 被引量:3
  • 3丁新国,赵云胜.危险源与危险源分类的研究[J].安全与环境工程,2005,12(3):87-90. 被引量:33
  • 4卢卫,王延平.保护层分析方法[J].安全、健康和环境,2006,6(4):32-34. 被引量:23
  • 5国家安全生产监督管理局.安全评价[M].3版.北京:煤炭工业出版社,2005:494-497.
  • 6新编危险物品安全手册编委会.新编危险物品安全手册[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2001.396.
  • 7Crowl A D, Louvar F.J. Chemical process safety : fundamentals with applications (3rd) [ M ]. New York : Prentice Hall,2011.
  • 8CCPS. Layer of protection analysis-simplified process risk assessment [ M ]. New York : American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Center for Chemical Process Safety,2001.
  • 9Bridges B W, Clark T. Key issues with implementing LOPA (layer of protection ananlysis)-perspective from one of the originators of LOPA [ A ]. 5^th Global congress on process safety [ C ]. Tampa, Florida: 2009.
  • 10Dowell A M. Is it really an independent protection layer [A]. 6^th Global congress on process safety[C]. San Antonio, Texas: 2010.

引证文献19

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部