期刊文献+

多元化企业经营系统脆性控制模型及最优策略 被引量:5

Brittle control model and optimal strategy for diversified company
下载PDF
导出
摘要 脆性的激发是导致企业全局性失败或经营困境的关键所在,脆性风险控制则是提高经营系统安全性的重要保障.在企业经营系统脆性风险扩散路径分析的基础上,建立了具有状态依赖的基本风险控制模型和考虑业务增长率与衰减率的改进控制模型,并评估和比较了免疫策略、隔离策略和综合控制3种方案的效果.同时,还进一步讨论了改进控制模型周期解的存在性以及周期控制方案下的最优策略问题.结果表明,不同的控制策略对脆性风险控制而言都能够得到相同的结果,但在相同的目标下,综合控制策略的总成本最小,而免疫策略和隔离策略总成本的大小则依赖于初始条件和临界参数;当任何一次控制方案都不能达到目标时,最佳选择就是采取周期性的综合控制策略. The excitation of brittleness is the key to overall managerial difficulties,and brittle risk control is the important leverage to improve the security of management system.Based on the path analysis of brittle risk spread in firm's business system,the basic state-dependent model and modified control model considering growth rate and decline rate of business are put forward,and the effect of three strategies such as immunization,isolation and integrated control is evaluated and compared.In addition,the existence of periodic solutions of improved model and optimal cycle control strategy are discussed.The results show that different control strategies can provide the same results in terms of risk control.Under the same objective,the total cost of integrated control strategy is the lowest,while the total cost of immunization strategy and isolation strategy depends on the initial conditions and critical parameters.Moreover,the best option is to implement a cyclical comprehensive control strategy when none of the strategies can achieve the goal.
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第9期1-12,共12页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
基金 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划资助项目(NECT-04-0485) 教育部人文社会科学研究资助项目(09YJC630217)
关键词 多元化战略 脆性风险 控制模型 最优策略 diversification strategy brittle risk control model optimal strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1王正位,朱武祥.市场非有效与公司投机及过度融资[J].管理科学学报,2010,13(2):50-57. 被引量:8
  • 2姜付秀.我国上市公司多元化经营的决定因素研究[J].管理世界,2006,22(5):128-135. 被引量:123
  • 3Li Y C, Mi H H. Empirical research on relationship between corporate diversification and performance-from 1031 Chinese listed companies [ J ]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2008, 17 (s) : 89 -93.
  • 4Wiersema M F, Bowen H P. Corporate diversification : The impact of foreign competition, industry globalization, and product diversification [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, 29 (2) : 115 - 132.
  • 5Chang S C, Wang C F. The effect of product diversification strategies on the relationship between international diversification and firm performance[J]. Journal of World Business, 2007, 42(1) : 61 -79.
  • 6Barnes E, Hardie B G. The diversification Puzzle: Revisiting the value impact of diversification for UK firms[ J]. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2006, 33(9) : 1508 -1534.
  • 7Arocena P. Cost and quality gains from diversification and vertical integration in the electricity industry: A DEA approach [J]. Energy Economics, 2008, 30(1): 39 -58.
  • 8Flipovic D, Kupper M. Optimal capital and risk transfers for group diversification [ J]. Mathematical Finance, 2008, 18 (1) : 55 -76.
  • 9Beckmann M J. Diversification versus concentration: A note on the allocation of effort among risky research projects [ J ]. Pacific Economic Review, 2000, 5 (3) : 291 -298.
  • 10Anderson R C, Reeb D M. Founding-family ownership, corporate diversification, and firm leverage [ J ]. Journal of Law & Economics, 2003, 46(2): 653-680.

二级参考文献71

共引文献150

同被引文献69

引证文献5

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部